Mrs, Rabbit, Lucky thing for the country you hold no elected position of responsibility for the country as a whole, ain't it?
On Jun 29, 12:01 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > btw, my position will always be me and mine first and foremost....it's > the mama in me, can't help it. > > :o) > > On Jun 29, 12:37 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mrs, Rabbit, > > > Once again, your position is only you and your life to be important, > > that principles and legal prededents are not. OK, if that's the way > > you want to play it. > > Methinks you are pretending to be a lot more dull-witted than you > > actually are. > > > On Jun 29, 11:15 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OMG Hollywood, here we go chasing tails again.....sigh. > > > > Regardless of what you *hear* or read, as Dick mentioned, they have > > > and will continue to do these acts. Not that Obama will admit it, but > > > he stays up late at night reading your post....yeah, he's on to you. > > > Better get a wireless cards, but then again, they have GPS....oh well, > > > looks like your screwed! j/k > > > > I understand your point Hollywood, really I do. But I do not do > > > anything that would warrant me to live such a secrect life. Like I > > > said, if Obama, yo mama, Bush or even Rush the band wanted to listen > > > to each and every phone call in and out of here, then so be it. I > > > have nothing to hide, so there is no reason to *protect family > > > members* from ease dropping. Besides, we only pay for the USE of the > > > lines/airwaves....they do not belong to us, we rent them. Mama always > > > said to never say anything you would be ashamed of or regret and if > > > any member of my family is using MY service to break the law, then > > > they need to be caught, period. What do you think Obama would do with > > > the information about my kids latest boyfriend saga? Or my Dads > > > latest lawn report? Zip, nodda dang thang! > > > > Ok, I've humored you, feel better now? :D > > > > On Jun 29, 11:13 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mrs. Rabbit, > > > > > Ok, you asked for it. > > > > > YOU have nothing to hide? So, your personal little life is the only > > > > consideration here? The Constituion and Bill of Rights is not > > > > important? You don't believe in a basic right of privacy.? All the > > > > govt. has to do is mutter, "well, it's for your own good" and you will > > > > go down on bended knee and submit to anything you're told to submit > > > > to? > > > > Yes, THEY tell you that they are only listening for hints of terrorist > > > > and/or criminal activity. But just who is it that gets to define just > > > > what a "suspected terrorist or criminal is"? How are you going to stop > > > > the govt. from using ANY information they might aquire with such > > > > "taps", in ANY matter they choose? > > > > A "suspected terrorist" is anyone the govt. says is one. You would > > > > hand the govt. the tools to supress any one they want to? > > > > > "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy > > > > from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a > > > > precedent that will reach to himself." THOMAS PAINE > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period. I have nothing to hide and > > > > > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains > > > > > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then > > > > > so be it. If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose > > > > > it? > > > > > > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Mrs. Rabbit, > > > > > > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I > > > > > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think > > > > > > about it a bit more. > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred! > > > > > > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping? What are you afraid of? If > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter? As many > > > > > > > phones > > > > > > > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to > > > > > > > listen > > > > > > > to them all anyways. It's the people who are sending up red > > > > > > > flags, > > > > > > > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor. > > > > > > > > BTW, which branch of the military were you in? > > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and > > > > > > > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard? > > > > > > > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with > > > > > > > > the GOP > > > > > > > > agenda?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
