When I lived in DC, we referred to the WaPo as the WaPoop.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:09 AM, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> And if Obama allows ANY administration offical to dine with a
> Washington Post employee he will void any claim to Lobbyist reform...
> Obama should publicly condemn this... And it is one further nail in
> the Old Medias Objectivity credibility...
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html
>
> >>> For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and
> association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those
> powerful few" — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the
> paper’s own reporters and editors.
>
> The astonishing offer is detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a
> health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the
> lobbyist said he feels it’s a conflict for the paper to charge for
> access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial
> staff."
>
> The offer — which essentially turns a news organization into a
> facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters — is a new sign
> of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at
> a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.
>
> And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The
> Washington Post for its ethical practices.
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html#ixzz0K6wtV6Hp&D
>
> >
>


-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to