Th e issue here is that folks in power (at the WP and in the
administration) thought it was a good idea

On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, Frederick The Moderate <[email protected]>
wrote:
> UNREAL. Did they think no one would find out about this? idiots.
>
> On Jul 2, 7:09 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > And if Obama allows ANY administration offical to dine with a
> > Washington Post employee he will void any claim to Lobbyist reform...
> > Obama should publicly condemn this... And it is one further nail in
> > the Old Medias Objectivity credibility...
>
> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html
>
> > >>> For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and 
> > >>> association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to 
> > >>> "those powerful few" — Obama administration officials, members of 
> > >>> Congress, and the paper’s own reporters and editors.
>
> > The astonishing offer is detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a
> > health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the
> > lobbyist said he feels it’s a conflict for the paper to charge for
> > access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial
> > staff."
>
> > The offer — which essentially turns a news organization into a
> > facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters — is a new sign
> > of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at
> > a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.
>
> > And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The
> > Washington Post for its ethical practices.
>
> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html#ixzz0K6wtV6Hp&D
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to