From: *Travis*
Date: Sat, Jul 11, 2009
Subject:  Obama Frees Iranian Terror Masters





 Of course, they are Muslims, like Obama.


B



http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjY0MjkwOWVkYTNlYzE2ZjM1N2E5M2M0MTdiYTI3MzM
=



July 11, 2009, 7:00 a.m.

Obama Frees Iranian Terror Masters
The release of the Irbil Five is a continuation of a shameful policy.

By Andrew C. McCarthy

There are a few things you need to know about President Obama’s shameful
release<http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/07/us_releases_iranian.php>on
Thursday of the “Irbil Five” — Quds Force commanders from Iran’s
Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) who were coordinating terrorist attacks in
Iraq that have killed hundreds — yes, *hundreds *— of American soldiers and
Marines.

First, of the 4,322 Americans killed in combat in Iraq since 2003, 10
percent of them (i.e., more than 400) have been murdered by a single type of
weapon alone, a weapon that is supplied by Iran for the singular purpose of
murdering Americans. As Steve Schippert
explains<http://tank.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzAzNzVlM2E3YmFlMTJhMWIyOWQ0NmNiMmMyZDQ4OTQ=>at
*NRO*’s military blog, the Tank, the weapon is “the EFP (Explosively Formed
Penetrator)<http://threatswatch.org/rapidrecon/2006/12/iranian-ieds-mvp-of-global/>,
designed by Iran’s IRGC specifically to penetrate the
armor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosively_formed_penetrator>of
the M1 Abrams main battle tank and, consequently, everything else
deployed in the field.” Understand: This does not mean Iran has killed only
400 Americans in Iraq. The number killed and wounded at the mullahs’
direction is far higher than that — likely *multiples *of that — when
factoring in the IRGC’s other tactics, such as the mustering of
Hezbollah-style Shiite terror cells.

Second, President Bush and our armed forces steadfastly refused demands by
Iran and Iraq’s Maliki government for the release of the Irbil Five because
Iran was continuing to coordinate terrorist operations against American
forces in Iraq (and to aid Taliban operations against American forces in
Afghanistan). Freeing the Quds operatives obviously would return the most
effective, dedicated terrorist trainers to their grisly business.

Third, Obama’s decision to release the five terror-masters comes while the
Iranian regime (a) is still conducting operations against Americans in Iraq,
even as we are in the process of withdrawing, and (b) is clearly working to
replicate its Lebanon model in Iraq: establishing a Shiite terror network,
loyal to Iran, as added pressure on the pliant Maliki to understand who is
boss once the Americans leave. As the *New York Times* reports, Gen. Ray
Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, put it this way less than two
weeks ago:

Iran is still supporting, funding, training surrogates who operate inside of
Iraq — flat out. . . . They have not stopped. And I don’t think they will
stop. I think they will continue to do that because they are also concerned,
in my opinion, [about] where Iraq is headed. They want to try to gain
influence here, and they will continue to do that. I think many of the
attacks in Baghdad are from individuals that have been, in fact, funded or
trained by the Iranians.

Fourth, President Obama’s release of the Quds terrorists is a natural
continuation of his administration’s stunningly irresponsible policy of
bartering terrorist prisoners for hostages. As I detailed
here<http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODFkYTU2MjBmMTE5MDUzZTEzZWMyMTE5ZWZjNWI4Mjg=>on
June 24, Obama has already released a leader of the Iran-backed Asaib
al-Haq terror network in Iraq, a jihadist who is among those responsible for
the 2007 murders of five American troops in Karbala. While the release was
ludicrously portrayed as an effort to further “Iraqi reconciliation” (as if
that would be a valid reason to spring a terrorist who had killed
Americans), it was in actuality a naïve attempt to secure the reciprocal
release of five British hostages — and a predictably disastrous one: The
terror network released only the corpses of two of the hostages, threatening
to kill the remaining three (and who knows whether they still are alive?)
unless other terror leaders were released.

Michael Ledeen has
reported<http://pajamasmedia.com/michaelledeen/2009/07/08/the-9th-of-july/>that
the release of the Irbil Five is part of the price Iran has demanded
for its release in May of the freelance journalist Roxana Saberi. Again,
that’s only *part* of* *the price: Iran also has demanded the release of
hundreds of its other terror facilitators in our custody. Expect to see
Obama accommodate this demand, too, in the weeks ahead.

Finally, when it comes to Iran, it has become increasingly apparent that
President Obama wants the
mullahs<http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTM0NTQ2OTdlZTNjNTJjYjgxNzFkN2JkOGE3YTgxZjM=>to
win<http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTY3OGNlNmFiNDgzM2ExZWU3MDBmZThlYTRhNDUwODk=>.
What you need to know is that Barack Obama is a wolf in “pragmatist”
clothing: Beneath the easy smile and above-it-all manner — the “neutral”
doing his best to weigh competing claims — is a radical leftist wedded to a
Manichean vision that depicts American imperialism as the primary evil in
the world.

You may not have wanted to addle your brain over his tutelage in Hawaii by
the Communist Frank Marshall Davis, nor his tracing of Davis’s career steps
to Chicago, where he seamlessly eased into the orbit of Arafat apologist
Rashid Khalidi, anti-American terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn,
and Maoist “educator” Michael Klonsky — all while imbibing 20 years’ worth
of Jeremiah Wright’s Marxist “black liberation theology.” But this
neo-Communist well from which Obama drew holds that the world order is a
maze of injustice, racism, and repression. Its unified theory for navigating
the maze is: “United States = culprit.” Its default position is that tyrants
are preferable as long as they are anti-American, and that while terrorist
methods may be regrettable, their root cause is always American provocation
— that is, the terrorists have a point.

In Iran, it is no longer enough for a rickety regime, whose anti-American
vitriol is its only vital sign, to rig the “democratic” process. This time,
blatant electoral fraud was also required to mulct victory for the mullahs’
candidate. The chicanery ignited a popular revolt. But the brutal regime
guessed right: The new American president would be supportive. So
sympathetic is Obama to the mullahs’ grievances — so hostile to what he,
like the regime, sees as America’s arrogant militarism — that he could be
depended on to go as far as politics allowed to help the regime ride out the
storm.

And so he has. Right now, politics will allow quite a lot: With unemployment
creeping toward 10 percent, the auto industry nationalized, the stimulus
revealed as history’s biggest redistribution racket (so far), and Democrats
bent on heaping ruinous carbon taxes and socialized medicine atop an economy
already crushed by tens of trillions in unfunded welfare-state liabilities,
Iran is barely on anyone’s radar screen.

So Obama is pouring it on while his trusty media idles. When they are not
looking the other way from the carnage in Iran’s streets, they are dutifully
reporting — as the AP
did<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gK1dWI5NIluLyrqUBumrC0W23FjgD99ARFJ80>—
that the Irbil Five are mere “diplomats.” Obama frees a terrorist with
the
blood of American troops on his hands, and the press yawns. Senators Jeff
Sessions and Jon Kyl press for
answers<http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Mzc5NGIxMmM3M2QzZWNjOGY3NTYxNWJhM2I5ZTMzYjk=>about
the release of the terrorist and Obama’s abandonment of a decades-old
American policy against trading terrorists for hostages, and the silence is
deafening.

Except in Tehran, where the mullahs are hearing exactly what they’ve banked
on hearing.






__._,_.

__,_._,___

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to