OK, I will play along. Let's forget the fact that your rebuttal has nothing to do with the illegal hit squads, nothing like a little debate drift to try to ignore the actual facts.
The trials have already begun, Bush had 7 years, how many trials did the Bush Administration have? What other policies? Please tell me how Obama is not only following Bush but going beyond the pale. On Jul 15, 11:00 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > If we were so wrong why is it that The One is copying all the Bush > policies and pushing them even further. I think you people are the ones > who were wrong. Everything that Bambi was criticizing Bush for has now > become the policies he is following even to the point where he is trying > to figure out how to have the trials by the military just as Bush was > trying to and Bambi's followers were taking him to court to fight > against. But then now they are good policies because Bambi is doing > them. The sheer hypocrisy of the Dems is beyond belief. > > VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > Dick, you Bush Apologists have been wrong about > > everything you defended Bush for. You fools > > have lost all credibility with the American public. > > > Or haven't you been paying attention to the last 2 elections? > > > On Jul 15, 10:39 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> BULL!!!!! > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > >>> This program was outside of all the agencies you just > >>> mentioned. > > >>> I guess you don't remember the Office Of Special Plans. > > >>> Cheney could not find Intel to support the invasion of Iraq > >>> in the regular Intelligence Agencies > > >>> So Cheney's solution was to create a New Intelligence Agency > >>> to evaluate the raw intelligence from all the agencies, and submit > >>> this > >>> Intel stripped of the negative N.I.E. but Cheney still state the Intel > >>> was > >>> conclusive intel from the designated Agencies. > > >>> So for me to believe that Cheney would not have hit squads because it > >>> was illegal or because agencies would not do it is being willfully > >>> ignorant to existing facts. > > >>> Cheney found a way to torture prisoners, some to death. > >>> Cheney found a way to spy on US citizens, IN THE US. > >>> Cheney found a way to out a CIA operative, > > >>> So what is one illegal or treasonous act. > > >>> On Jul 15, 8:42 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> They didn't "hide killing al Queda leaders." The proposal was NEVER > >>>> INITIATED. The Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI consider many > >>>> possible scenarios. They don't go to Congress and say "Hey, one of our > >>>> guys thought of pouring tons of laundry detergent into the Red Sea" > >>>> every time someone proposes something. They do tell Congress when they > >>>> decide to move forward with a plan. Get it? > > >>>> On Jul 15, 8:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Are you sure? Because I find no reason to > >>>>> hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > >>>>> Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > >>>>> Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches. > > >>>>> On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their supporters. > > >>>>>> On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al qaeda > >>>>>>> hit team illegal? > > >>>>>>> A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign > >>>>>>> countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda? > > >>>>>>> Just a thought..... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
