You mean like your hysterical, CHILDISH rants about Cheney? No thanks Beaver.
On Jul 16, 5:21 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe you should try INTELLIGENT rebuttals that contain > a modicum of facts and truth. > > On Jul 16, 11:12 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why do you work yourself up into idiotic boobery? Maybe you should > > stick to one sentence posts. > > > On Jul 15, 10:34 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > This program was outside of all the agencies you just > > > mentioned. > > > > I guess you don't remember the Office Of Special Plans. > > > > Cheney could not find Intel to support the invasion of Iraq > > > in the regular Intelligence Agencies > > > > So Cheney's solution was to create a New Intelligence Agency > > > to evaluate the raw intelligence from all the agencies, and submit > > > this > > > Intel stripped of the negative N.I.E. but Cheney still state the Intel > > > was > > > conclusive intel from the designated Agencies. > > > > So for me to believe that Cheney would not have hit squads because it > > > was illegal or because agencies would not do it is being willfully > > > ignorant to existing facts. > > > > Cheney found a way to torture prisoners, some to death. > > > Cheney found a way to spy on US citizens, IN THE US. > > > Cheney found a way to out a CIA operative, > > > > So what is one illegal or treasonous act. > > > > On Jul 15, 8:42 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > They didn't "hide killing al Queda leaders." The proposal was NEVER > > > > INITIATED. The Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI consider many > > > > possible scenarios. They don't go to Congress and say "Hey, one of our > > > > guys thought of pouring tons of laundry detergent into the Red Sea" > > > > every time someone proposes something. They do tell Congress when they > > > > decide to move forward with a plan. Get it? > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to > > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the > > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman. > > > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches. > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their supporters. > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al qaeda > > > > > > > hit team illegal? > > > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign > > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda? > > > > > > > > Just a thought..... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
