<
http://www.uticaod.com/guest/x592697116/Guest-view-Ballistic-microstamping-law-as-it-relates-to-pistols-huge-waste-of-money
>

The ballistic microstamping law as it relates to
pistols (semi-automatic handguns) is a huge waste of money.

Some pertinent points need to be made to help
non-gun owners understand the existing gun laws
throughout the nation so they will hopefully
realize I and many other law-abiding gun owners feel this way.

Forty-four states do not require any type of
license to purchase or own a handgun. Thirty-one
states do not have any prohibition on public open
carry of a handgun. By law, all gun owners in New
York state must carry concealed in any public
format. (Concealed means out of sight; the gun must be covered up).

The application process takes three to four
months. The applicant undergoes an extensive
background check that includes mental health,
domestic and a criminal history check. All of
this must be completed before a license to carry a handgun is issued.

New York is one of only three states that has a
gun registry specific to both the owner and the
gun. Every handgun I own has to be registered to
me via my pistol license. If I sell that gun,
there is a record of who purchased it from me; 47
states do not have this requirement.

So what is microstamping? It is the ability to
have the make, caliber and serial number
microstamped on the back of the cartridge (what
most people call the bullet) by the firing pin of
any semi-automatic handgun sold in New York — not
revolvers. The firing pin is about the size of
the tip of a ballpoint pen, so this gives you
some idea of how small the microstamp is.

The political theory behind this is that any
cartridge case (the cartridge case is what is
ejected to the ground when any semi-automatic gun
is fired) found on the ground at a crime scene
can now be traced back to the owner. Sounds
fantastic doesn’t it? So why the opposition? How
will this affect legal gun owners and criminals?

It will have a great impact on legal gun owners,
but virtually no impact whatsoever on criminals.
New York would be the only state microstamping
semi-automatic handguns (revolvers cannot be
microstamped), and the manufacturers of these
guns would simply no longer wish to do business
in New York because it would be cost prohibitive
to change their whole system for the sake of
selling semi-automatic guns here. Last year, gun
sales to new pistol license holders in Oneida
County alone accounted for taxable sales of approximately $225,000.

This number does not include the thousands of
existing license holders that also purchased
handguns last year, nor does it include the taxes
associated with Internet sales of handguns from
or to New York by licensed gun dealers.

The number of pistol license holders in Oneida
County alone is nearing 24,000, with more than
1,152,435 statewide. These gun owners make up a
large percentage of yearly taxable sales.

Secondly, the firing pin of any semi-automatic
handgun can be changed by purchasing a pin from
one of the 49 states that would not be
microstamping guns or by simply purchasing a
pre-existing firing pin in New York that has not been micro stamped.

Representatives from both Glock Manufacturing and
Remington Arms have stated that even if all
states required microstamping, the ability to
remove this technology from the handgun could be
done in seconds with a small file by filing the
head of the firing pin, rendering this expensive,
currently nonexistent and quite intrusive technology obsolete.

Criminals are not purchasing guns legally in New York. They can’t.

So even if they are using a gun that they
purchased illegally or stole that has a
microstamped capability and they fail to change
or file the head of the firing pin, the gun will
still be traced to the original owner, not them.

Finally, 90 percent-plus of crimes committed with
a handgun in New York are committed by people who
possessed a gun that was never registered here
but brought in illegally because of lax gun laws in other states.

Pistol license holders are not killing people. In
my 10 years in the pistol license office, there
has been one pistol license holder that committed
murder with a handgun: Jiverly Wong of Binghamton was the first.
With the vast majority of pistol license holders
being middle-class working men and women, what is
the political logic of more anti-business,
anti-rights, anti-gun laws that will lead to a
reduction in sales tax and, quite frankly, do not work?

What is bizarre is that New York has already
tried this with its current ballistic testing law
that requires all new guns sold in this state to
be ballistic tested. Any gun sold new must be
fired, and the lead (the actual projectile that
exits the gun when fired) and casing has its own
unique fingerprint and is sent to the state police in Albany.

The theory behind this legislation when it was
passed was that if we find the lead and casing in
or near the body of the victim, we can catch the killer.

Tens of thousands of handguns have been tested to
the tune of millions of state tax dollars per
year. Killers caught? Zero! The law is so bad the
state of Maryland repealed it shortly after it was passed.
It has been said over and over again that
microstamping will not work. It is another example of bad legislation.

Politicians better hope the pistol license
holders in Oneida County and throughout the
state, the bulk of whom are middle-class
taxpaying citizens, do not unite as one voting block.

These law-abiding citizens are sick and tired of
legislation that has no effect on criminals, but
is one more attempt to prohibit their legal, responsible right to bear arms.

Daniel P. Sullivan is assistant pistol license officer for Oneida County.

__._,_

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to