Sugarshack, Where are the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that still remain unaccounted for?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:45 PM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]>wrote: > > Yeah, everyone else is wrong but you and the other dumb asses > got it correct, just like you all believed the entire litany from > WMD's to 'there is no problem with the economy'. > > LMFAO, keep eating the chocolate pudding and smiling. > > On Jul 30, 7:39 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > You really are a Moonbat Sean, > > > > Factcheck was caught in a blatant lie, and you attempt to postulate and > > continue the lie. > > > > To date, no one, except some Hawaii public servant, (and we assume > President > > Obama) has seen President Obama's vaulted birth certificate. > > > > =================== > > > > *Andy Martin humiliates the mainstream media, again* > > CNN is defrauded by Annenberg/FactCheck.org lieshttp:// > www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm > > > > 2008-10-29 03:50:23 - *Why do the mainstream media lie to the American > > people about Barack Obama's birth > > certificate<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>? > > And why does Obama lie? Andy Martin exposes FactCheck.org's lies.* > > > > Andy Martin's new bombshell embarrasses mainstream media, again > > Why is Barack Obama hiding access to his original birth certificate? > > > > ANDY MARTIN > > Executive Editor > > ContrarianCommentary.com > > > > 'Factually Correct, Not > > Politically Correct' > > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: > > > > Internet <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#> powerhouse Andy > Martin > > exposes CNN and as a victim of lies posted by Factcheck.org > > > > Andy says mainstream media are dupes (no surprise there) of Barack > Obama's > > LIES > > > > How can Factcheck.org lie to the American people? Easy, they are in > Barack > > Obamas' back pocket > > > > "Debunk this column," says Andy Martin, issuing a challenge to CNN and > every > > other mainstream media > > > > Why does ContrarianCommentary.com get it right all the time, and the > > mainstream media get it wrong? > > > > (NEW YORK)(October 28, 2008) CNN and mainstream media have been deceived > by > > Barack Obama, again. If he will lie to his media megaphones, it is no > > surprise Obama is lying to the American people. Factcheck.org is another > > Obama "front" that is publishing > > <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>self-serving lies about the > > candidate. > > > > Here are the facts; here is the truth. Debunk this! We challenge any > > mainstream media to prove this column wrong. > > > > CNN recently did a report on my anti-Obama activity. > > > > www.youtube.com/v/mxrDlugBj4o > > > > In the course of the report, CNN relied on a web site known as > > "Factcheck.org," which should be really known as "ObamaLies.org" > > > > www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html > > > > In this column we definitively expose Factcheck.org as an Obama > propaganda > > front and-since CNN's report about me was generally fair-poke fun at CNN > for > > having been suckered by Obama's hired liars. John Roberts, come in > please. > > > > Is it any wonder that the American people are disgusted with the > mainstream > > media? When will Grandpa McCain and Sister Sarah wake up and start > attacking > > the biggest liar in American political history, Barack Frank Marshall > Davis > > Obama? McCain's failure to confront Obama, and to wage effective war > against > > Obama's blitzkrieg of lies, has denied the American people a competent, > > focused election campaign. > > > > Here are the facts: > > > > 1. Factcheck.org says they have "seen, touched, examined and photographed > > the original birth certificate." Wrong. They claim "We have posted > > high-resolution photographs of the document as 'supporting documents' to > > this article." Wrong again. > > > > 2. Barack Obama was born in 1961. At that time, birth > > records<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>(Hawai'i calls them > > a "Certificate of Live Birth" or "COLB") were maintained > > in either handwritten or typewritten form. Honolulu appears to have used > > typewriters. Some people have referred to the original certificate held > by a > > local authority as a "vault" certificate. I have literally walked into > the > > City Clerk's vault in my hometown, and seen a bound book with my > handwritten > > birth certificate in it. That is a "vault" certificate, or, more > > particularly, an original copy maintained in the vault of a public > official. > > > > 3. Someone else has posted what they claim is a copy of their COLB, > issued > > some years later but still apparently based on a > > photocopy<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>of the original. > > Look at this apparent 1963 template: > > snarkybytes.com/?p=521 > > > > We have been promised another COLB from the same period and we are > awaiting > > receipt. > > > > Does the 1963 version look anything like Obama's computerized COLB? Of > > course not. > > > > 4. The FactCheck.org "document" is not a "copy" of an "original" 1961 > > typewritten COLB. Rather, the Obamagoths handed Factcheck.org a copy of a > > current, computer <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>-printed > COLB > > that was generated from a database, instead of from a 1961 typewritten > > original. Factcheck.org's "Joe Miller" falsely claims to be holding "The > > Obama birth certificate." What he is actually holding is a > > computer-generated document containing some of the original information. > > > > 5. Factcheck.org also posts the back of the document, dated July 6, 2007 > > (issued long before it was posted over a year later). On the back you can > > clearly read, even on the Internet< > http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>, > > "True copy ("of abstract of the record on ("file in The Hawaii State > > Department of Health." Go the Factcheck.org site and see if I am lying. > > > > 6. Thus, the document Factcheck.org purports to be a copy of an > "original," > > is nothing of the sort. Rather the document is a "copy of an abstract" of > > the record. I suspect that the "abstract of the record" means they held > > double records, the original COLB's and possibly a ledger-style book > > "abstracting" the same information. (In legal terms, an abstract usually > > implies something other than the original, usually a compendium compiled > > from an original, as in an abstract of title for real property.) > > > > 7. I don't want to blame ordinary American for being fooled by > Factcheck.org > > and the lying Obamagoths. Joe the Plumber is not expected to have legal > > skill. But, given all of the hubbub and hullabaloo over the Obama birth > > record wouldn't you expect more from CNN, or even from Factcheck.org? Why > > are they fooled so easily? Or were they not "fooled" at all, and merely > > willing dupes in a massive public fraud orchestrated by Barack Obama and > the > > Obama gang? > > > > 8. Clearly, Barack Obama has contempt for the American people. He has > lied, > > lied and lied about the location of and contents of his original, > > typewritten COLB. And he has persuaded CNN and Factcheck.org to lie for > him, > > falsely portraying a "copy of an abstract" as a copy of an original > > typewritten 1961 document. For shame. > > > > 9. Now you know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the trust > about > > Barack Obama's birth certificate charade. I defy anyone to prove me > wrong, > > including the jerks that write for the Chicago Sun-Times. Once again, the > > mainstream media have egg (or worse) on their faces. They have been > caught > > lying to their audiences. > > > > 10. My last question: where are John McCain and Sarah Palin in this > > veritable forest of forgery being foisted on the voting public by the > > Obamagoths? Isn't it time they started to fight back against Obama's > river > > of lies? > > > > 11. Obama loves to play lawyer games and use lawyer-like evasion with > media > > and the public. Is the piece of > > paper<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>posted at > > Factcheck.org a "legal" document? Yes it is. Today we accept all > > kinds of computerized facsimiles or printouts as legal documents. But, > > remember, there were no computers in 1961. What the Factcheck.org > document > > obviously is not is a copy of the 1961 typewritten original. What is most > > galling is that every one of us has a "birth certificate." Many of us > born a > > few years back know that the original documents were either handwritten > (my > > case) or typewritten. But a computerized "copy of an abstract" is not a > copy > > of the original handwritten or typewritten document filed with the local > > authority when we were born. Obama is lying, Factcheck.org is lying and > they > > have lied to the American people. That is an American tragedy. > > > > --- > > We are pursuing a lawsuit in Honolulu to force disclosure of Obama's > > original, typewritten 1961 COLB. If you would like to contribute to the > > costs of this effort, you can contribute at: > > CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com< > http://committeeofonemilliontodefeatbarackobama.com/> > > > > Here is our letter to the judge concerning scheduling the next hearing: > > > > CONTRARIANCOMMENTARY.COM <http://contrariancommentary.com/> > > New York-London-Washington-Chicago-San Francisco-Palm > > Beach<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#> > > > > Headquarters mail: > > Post Office Box 1851 > > New York, NY 10150-1851 > > Tel.(866) 706-2639 > > Fax <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>(866) 707-2639 > > Web: ContrarianCommentary.com > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > Andy Martin, J. D. > > Professor of Law (Adj.) > > Executive Editor > > > > October 28, 2008 > > > > Hon. Bert I. Ayabe > > Circuit Court > > 777 Punchbowl Street > > Honolulu, HI 96813-5093 > > > > and > > > > Hon. Mark Bennett > > Attorney General > > 425 Queen Street > > Honolulu, HI 96813 > > via fax <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>(808) 586-1239 > > > > Re: Martin v. Lingle Circuit Court No. 08-1-2147-10-BIA > > > > Dear Judge Ayabe > > and General Bennett: > > > > I spoke with the court's judicial assistant on Monday, and today I am > > FedExing the original Order to Show Cause back to the court so I can > obtain > > a new date. > > > > The court has indicated it will not hear me by > > phone<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>on November 7th, so I > > must purchase > > airline tickets <http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#> and clear > > several days to make a personal trip to > > Honolulu<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>. > > That is a complicated process, particularly given the approaching holiday > > season. > > > > If I am assigned a new hearing date on October 29th (Wednesday), I can > > arrange to appear in person at a hearing in Honolulu on November > 11th-14th > > (later in the week, Thursday or Friday, is better for me). I am also > > available November 18-21. > > > > This lawsuit raises important issues of statutory > > construction<http://www.pr-inside.com/print885564.htm#>of Hawai'i law, > > as well as significant public interest and constitutional > > questions. I have ... > > > > read more ยป > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
