Sage, read Mark's reply.  After 9-11 it was thought prudent to protect
the second person in line to the presidency by having them fly non-
stop on a military jet.



On Aug 7, 10:19 am, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                  Richard,
>
>                        My point is not who flies on them but the "
> hypocrisy " of the democratic run congress  in this matter relative to
> their objection to Corporate types using their jets for business. It
> is a well known fact that Nancy Pelosi is one of those who takes
> advantage of these jets for herself and family members, but not one
> liberal two faced democrat says boo !  At $600,000,000 a piece in this
> economy it is waste. In that respect both you and Mark get an " F
> " !
>
> *************************************************************************** 
> ***************************************************
>
> On Aug 7, 12:52 pm, RICHARD BROWN <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The Annointed One gets an "A" for the right response.  This was an end-
> > run around the transparency rules concerning earmarks.  This was done
> > under the "operating costs" provisions so no one gets to see who asked
> > for it.  But they are simply jets for high-ranking government
> > employees or military commanders to get around without flying on
> > commercial flights.
>
> > On Aug 7, 9:34 am, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >                 Mark,
>
> > >                   Who's got the final say?  The majority democrat
> > > hypocrites vis a vis the same committee who railed against the Auto
> > > officials jets.
>
> > > ***************************************************************************
> > >  ****************************
>
> > > On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Yes, i saw it... I am still waiting to hear which congressmen stood up
> > > > against this. the video does not refute the ownership and mission as i
> > > > stated...
>
> > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >                 Mark,
>
> > > > >                   If you view the video the Pentagon only requested
> > > > > one jet and the Pelosi crowd forced on three @ $600,000,000 each. The
> > > > > Pentagon does not need that many and has extra post costs of upkeep ,
> > > > > people to staff the jets etc. Lets get it right the authorization came
> > > > > from someone at the top in congress!  Peculiar especially when they
> > > > > publicly humiliated the Auto officials for having corporate jets. Just
> > > > > another two faced double standard on the part of the liberal
> > > > > socialists and their ilk.
>
> > > > > ***************************************************************************
> > > > >  ­*********************************************
>
> > > > > On Aug 7, 11:49 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Lets try to at least get it correct.... these jets are world flight
> > > > > > capable. they are US Air Force property and are available to ANYONE 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > Government to include the joint chiefs, Congress, cabinet members, 
> > > > > > etc
> > > > > > for missions that require non-stop flights.
>
> > > > > > They are not reserved for the congress alone, nor are they a 
> > > > > > departure
> > > > > > from equipment type not already in service.
>
> > > > > > now to get real....what a load of pork that neither democrat or
> > > > > > republican voted against.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 7, 9:43 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/08/05/pelosi_town_hall_pr.
> > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >          [image: CNN.com] <http://www.cnn.com>
> > > > > > > >  Powered by        * Please note, the sender's email address 
> > > > > > > > has not
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > verified.            Bella Pelosi Riding High!
>
> > > > > > > >                   Click the following to access the sent link:
> > > > >     Congressional
> > > > > > > > jets<
> > > > >http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&;...>
> > > > > > > > *                   [image: SAVE THIS link]<
> > > > >http://www.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=sav...>
> > > > > [image:
> > > > > > > > FORWARD THIS link]<
> > > > >http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&e...>
> > > > > > > >             Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to 
> > > > > > > > email
> > > > > content
> > > > > > > > from any Web site. Click here<
> > > > >http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserBu...>for
> > > > > more information.
>
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > >http://victory.cnn.com/click.ng/Origin=cnn&PagePos=1&Section=cnnclick...>
> > > > > > > >         *This article can also be accessed if you copy and 
> > > > > > > > paste the
> > > > > > > > entire address below into your web browser.
>
> > > > >http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2009/08/05/ldt.sylvester.co...
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > Mark M. Kahle,  ,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to