No, Frank, what I am suggesting is that by keeping this man in prison
Scotland, was in a position of making this man a martyr which would
only make more pain for everyone.


On Aug 24, 3:10 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Diogenes,
>
> Are yoFu suggesting that Scotland was wise to let this guy out so as to
> avoid pissing terrorists off?  Not exactly a very smart policy for
> dealing with terrorists. It wouldn't have been saber rattling; it
> would have been serving out a sentence.
>
> It's not a question of his death in prison providing some peace, but
> rather, his release causing more pain and anguish for the victims
> families. None of the victims or their families was given a chance to
> be together when the victims died so why is he afforded this act of
> compassion? He showed no compassion or remorse, but now the families
> are supposed to accept compassion for him?  He was supposed to serve
> out his life in prison and the families thought they had closed this
> chapter in their lives. You think his receiving a hero's welcome, with
> all the celebration that went on, hasn't reopened old wounds?  You
> think that's fair?
>
> On Aug 24, 1:57 pm, Diogenes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Keith,
>
> > For a sincere belief that this will fall upon deaf ears (so to speak)
> > I will attempt to explain why I said what I have said. I for one
> > believe that life offers choices you can choose to make a difference
> > and move on or make choice to stay mired in the morass of your own
> > making. Neither of which is always right. Secondly, once a choice is
> > made you are confronted with either doing something useful are not.
> > Little is gained by rattling a saber at an already angry enemy. If
> > Scotland had not let this man go home it well may have made its self a
> > target and held a man to which the Islamist would have venerated as a
> > martyr, and we have made enough of them. Nothing would be gained in
> > seening this man die in prision which would have made peace for the
> > families who have lost relatives. So it is my belief that Scotland
> > made a better choice then you have proposed.
>
> > On Aug 23, 11:09 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, Studio,
>
> > > Apparently you are once again correct.  The comment from Qaddafi thanking
> > > his "Good Friend"  Prime Minister Brown, raises a number of questions, 
> > > that
> > > still remain unanswered.
>
> > > Diogenes,
>
> > > Again, you just totally baffle me with your thought processes.....
>
> > > If this homicidal murderer had been released on a stretcher, shackled, and
> > > placed under house arrest to die with his family, then maybe it wouldn't
> > > have been such a hard pill to swallow.  Instead, the man climbs aboard a 
> > > 737
> > > in hospital garb, barely able to make it up the steps of the plane, and
> > > WALA:  He arrives in Tripoli in a business suit to a Hero's welcome,
> > > confetti flying, and miraculously, he is able to scale down the stairs,
> > > gallivant across the tarmac, and swap sugar with Qaddafi himself.
>
> > > The following was shared by Dick Thompson, but I thought it was an
> > > interesting analogy:
>
> > > ===================
>
> > > When Italy let the Achille Lauro terrorists go free - terrorists who had
> > > only killed a handful of people, Ronald Reagan dispatched the U.S. Navy to
> > > intercept the airplane flying them home, over international waters, forced
> > > the plane down, and brought them to justice.
>
> > > At 5:30 P.M. on Thursday, October 10, President Reagan was aboard Air 
> > > Force
> > > One, returning to Washington, D.C. from a speaking engagement in the 
> > > Chicago
> > > area, when word reached him that the terrorists were getting away. He
> > > authorized the carrier USS Saratoga, patrolling the Adriatic Sea, to put
> > > seven F-14 Tomcats into the air. Their orders: divert the Egyptian 
> > > aircraft
> > > to a NATO base at Sigonella, Sicily. The appearance of the Tomcats 
> > > unnerved
> > > the EgyptAir pilot, who compliantly altered course for Sicily. He had no 
> > > way
> > > of knowing that the American "top guns" had orders to refrain from 
> > > shooting
> > > down the 737 without direct instructions from the president.
>
> > > Initially the Italians were not disposed to cooperate, scrambling their 
> > > own
> > > warplanes to prevent a landing at Sigonella, but after a call from Reagan,
> > > Italy's Prime Minister Bettino Craxi gave permission to land. The American
> > > plan was to load the Palestinians onto a U.S. military aircraft and
> > > transport them to the States. But when American troops encircled the 737
> > > they found themselves surrounded in turn by Italian soldiers. Italy had
> > > decided that since the Achille Lauro was an Italian vessel, the hijackers
> > > should be tried in Italian courts. The terrorists faced charges of
> > > premeditated murder, kidnapping and hijacking. When Reagan called Craxi 
> > > this
> > > time, the Italian leader wouldn't budge -- Abul Abbas and his cronies 
> > > would
> > > remain in Italian hands. After Arafat threatened *uncontrollable 
> > > reactions"
> > > if the Italians turned Abbas over to the Americans, Italy refused a U.S.
> > > request to extradite the terrorist leader. Abbas was soon freed. In 1986 
> > > the
> > > four hijackers were convicted and sentenced to long prison terms,
>
> > > The American public emphatically approved of the bold mid-flight
> > > interception of the Achille Lauro terrorists. Egypt's President Hosni
> > > Mubarak decorated the 737 pilot and demanded an apology from the United
> > > States. Reagan vowed he would never apologize.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to