Zeb, Guess that all depends on how you might wish to define "intimately, now wouldn't it?
On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > Its probably better for the President to be intimately involved with > the war in Afghanistan than it is for him to dally with the Olympics > or appearances on Leno and Letterman. > > On Sep 28, 8:02 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > jgg, > > > Good. A President is NOT micro-managing the on-site CO and letting him > > do his job. This is how it should be. President Obama does not have a > > military background, remember? > > > On Sep 28, 5:06 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > in 70 days... So much for giving the commander a direct uncensored > > > access to the President... Seems to me, a leader would want to > > > direct communication with such a key commander in Afghanistan... > > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/back-story/2009/sep/28/us-comm... > > > > >>> "I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once on a VTC > > > >>> [video teleconference]," Gen. Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter > > > >>> David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday. > > > > "You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?" Mr. Martin followed up. > > > > "That is correct," the general replied.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
