Zeb, Bullshit. Let me quote you; "Rather that addressing wjether the President should spend his precious time getting more involved in the Olympic Games or familarizing himself with a war we're engaged in....."
I was "proved wrong" about exactly what? On Oct 1, 1:32 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't say you did. And nice try at trying to change the subject > again when you are proved wrong. > > On Sep 30, 2:06 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Zeb, > > > Bull-fucking-shit. NO where did I say the President should not spend > > time on the war issues. > > > On Sep 30, 12:20 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You question word meaning because you are obsessed with minutia and > > > because it avoids debating the subject at hand. Rather than addressing > > > whether the President should spend his precious time getting more > > > involved with the Olympic games or familiarizing himself with a war we > > > are engaged in, you question the meaning of the word "intimately." How > > > very Clintonian of you. How very evasive. > > > > On Sep 30, 12:07 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > Ok amigo. I'll take your answer to the rather specifc question(s) I > > > > posed as duuuuuh......... > > > > I WILL question every word, every phrase as pleases me. I know exactly > > > > what you are trying to do, you're just not very good at it. > > > > > On Sep 29, 10:57 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The way you "question" the meaning of words is useless and merely > > > > > evasive. Saying "it depends on how you define intimately" is as > > > > > evasive as "it depends on how you define 'is'." > > > > > > On Sep 29, 6:04 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > The wording DEFINES the issue. Two leaders can be taking the exact > > > > > > same actions. One observer can describe the actions of one as > > > > > > "obsessive micro-managing", another can describe the exact same > > > > > > actions taken by the other man as "skillful over-sight or managing" > > > > > > or > > > > > > some other term that carries a positive connotation. > > > > > > > You've never read any Edward Bernays writings, total unaware of > > > > > > marketing, labeling, branding, public relations or advertising? > > > > > > Politicians refer to it a "spinning". > > > > > > > Words are important. Your fucking right I'm going to questions words > > > > > > and ther definitions. > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 4:47 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > How long do you think you can avoid the issue at hand by > > > > > > > questioning > > > > > > > the definition of every other word? > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 4:18 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > > > Guess that all depends on how you might wish to define > > > > > > > > "intimately, > > > > > > > > now wouldn't it? > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Its probably better for the President to be intimately > > > > > > > > > involved with > > > > > > > > > the war in Afghanistan than it is for him to dally with the > > > > > > > > > Olympics > > > > > > > > > or appearances on Leno and Letterman. > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 28, 8:02 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > jgg, > > > > > > > > > > > Good. A President is NOT micro-managing the on-site CO and > > > > > > > > > > letting him > > > > > > > > > > do his job. This is how it should be. President Obama does > > > > > > > > > > not have a > > > > > > > > > > military background, remember? > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 28, 5:06 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > in 70 days... So much for giving the commander a direct > > > > > > > > > > > uncensored > > > > > > > > > > > access to the President... Seems to me, a leader would > > > > > > > > > > > want to > > > > > > > > > > > direct communication with such a key commander in > > > > > > > > > > > Afghanistan... > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/back-story/2009/sep/28/us-comm... > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> "I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, > > > > > > > > > > > >>> once on a VTC [video teleconference]," Gen. Stanley > > > > > > > > > > > >>> McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a > > > > > > > > > > > >>> television interview that aired Sunday. > > > > > > > > > > > > "You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?" Mr. Martin > > > > > > > > > > > followed up. > > > > > > > > > > > > "That is correct," the general replied.- Hide quoted text > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
