So how do you explain the fact that the cut off for the nominations
was two weeks after his inauguration?  That's what makes it
insignificant.

On Oct 9, 8:22 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> frankg,
>
> It's a simple matter of personal opinion as to whether or not money/
> time was wasted in the President's attempt to help the U.S. get the
> Olympics. I made no reference to people that expressed a difference of
> opinion in a sane manner. I mentioned only the nut-jobs. Any "slap on
> the face" of the U.S was removed by the honor of a Noble Prize to a
> sitting U.S. President.
>
> The AP article made the reasons for the award quite clear.
> 1. The Presidents initiatives to reduce nuclear weapons.
> 2. His efforts to ease dangerous tensions with the Muslim world.
> 3. His stress of diplomacy & cooperation rather than unilateralism
> 4. He's been in office 9 months and has managed not to start a single
> war (OK, I added that one myself).
>
> Actually I personally do not consider his award as significant as
> Jimmy Carter's. After all the peace accord he brokered between Egypt
> and Israel is STILL holding. Still, to be dismissive of the AWARD
> itself just because it was awarded to someone you don't like is silly.
>
> On Oct 9, 9:52 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hollywood,
>
> > I'm not following the point you're trying to make.
>
> > A week ago people were complaining that Obama was wasting time/money
> > traveling to Denmark to make a push for the Olympics. They also felt
> > that it was an even greater slap in the face of Chicago/US that Obama
> > would make a personal plea and then get cut so early in the voting. So
> > people questioned his motive, the waste of time & money, and the
> > impact his being snubbed would have on him and the US.
>
> > How does this in any way relate to people now objecting that Obama be
> > awarded a Nobel Peace Prize (a prize, btw, that is typically awarded
> > to people who have actually achieved something) when he's not yet
> > accomplished a thing?
>
> > I just don't get the connection between the two events...
>
> > On Oct 9, 10:23 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Zeb,
>
> > > Wait a minute there lad. Less than a week ago the world was
> > > practically coming to an end because the U.S. did not get the Olympics
> > > and it was all the "fault" of President Obama.
> > > Didn't you read the comments here? The WORLD was using the President
> > > as "a urinal", it was damaging to OUR prestige, one dumbass even
> > > suggested it just might be the "last straw" of indignities heaped upon
> > > our nation and their might be a military coup because of it.
>
> > > BUT NOW the freakin' NOBEL PEACE PRIZE is trivial & unimportant?????
> > > WTF? LMFAO!!
>
> > > On Oct 9, 8:43 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Noting that the 4-H Club Blue Ribbon has really gained no additional
> > > > luster over the decades, the International Committee on Prize Prestige
> > > > added that it has lost no luster either. The flagging Nobel, on the
> > > > other hand, began a steep descent when an apparently hysterical
> > > > committee awarded the Peace Nobel to an unrepentant terrorist and an
> > > > ineffectual ex-President Peanut decades ago. Subsequently, Nobel
> > > > "Peace" prizes have been awarded to people for making inaccurate
> > > > movies about the weather and now for being a man with black skin.
> > > > Representatives from the 4-H Club, nonetheless, are celebrating their
> > > > assent in prestige and are said to be considering a Blue Ribbon for
> > > > "Peace" themselves.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to