Zeb, Because Zeb will keep this up forever if you let him. If you or I were to post the site he would simply claim it was "false", that's why I wanted him to look it up himself.
On Oct 12, 9:28 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > What makes me think that? The nobelprize.org website. > > And I quote; > > Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize: Every year, the Norwegian Nobel > Committee sends out thousands of letters inviting qualified people to > submit their nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize. The names of the > nominees and other information about the nominations cannot be > revealed until 50 years later. > > As to why they want them concealed -- I have no idea. You'll need to > take that up with them. > > So when you told Hollywood they were all listed at "the Nobel web > site", which site were you referring to? > > Hollywood, > > You and I must have different definitions of what "back and forth > discussion" is. I asked Zeb a simple, single question. I'd still like > to know who was on that list he was referring to. > > On Oct 12, 4:58 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >As far as I know, their identities are supposed to remain > > > concealed for 50 years, > > > What makes you think that? And why in the world would they want the > > names of nominees concealed? > > > On Oct 12, 12:18 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Zeb, > > > > Can you please provide a link to any site that lists the 2009 > > > nominees? As far as I know, their identities are supposed to remain > > > concealed for 50 years, so am interested in knowing how you got the > > > names and their qualifications. > > > > I agree that there has to be someone who has actually done something > > > to promote peace in the world and is more qualified than Obama, but > > > unless you can name names and qualifications it's difficult to get > > > beyond conceptual disagreement. > > > > On Oct 11, 11:38 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >Who else was nominated and why do you think they were more worthy > > > > > Go to the Nobel web site, lazy ass. They're all listed there. Why > > > > they're more qualified should be obvious, even to you. > > > > > On Oct 9, 6:31 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > Who else was nominated and why do you think they were more worthy of > > > > > the award? But, then again, it really doesnt matter as you are not on > > > > > the committee. Tough break. > > > > > > On Oct 9, 1:21 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > All of the reasons you cited are horse shit. The Nobel Committee > > > > > > nominated Obama for this prize 10 days after his inauguration when > > > > > > he > > > > > > had done even less than he has done to date. In fact he had done > > > > > > NOTHING at that point. This prize is an embarrassment because it was > > > > > > given by a bunch of hysterical Bush hating libroids in Norway to the > > > > > > detriment of all those who were nominated and truly deserving. It is > > > > > > sad to see people entrusted with with the prestige of the Nobel > > > > > > destroying its credibility for their own political obsessions. > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 11:22 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > frankg, > > > > > > > > It's a simple matter of personal opinion as to whether or not > > > > > > > money/ > > > > > > > time was wasted in the President's attempt to help the U.S. get > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > Olympics. I made no reference to people that expressed a > > > > > > > difference of > > > > > > > opinion in a sane manner. I mentioned only the nut-jobs. Any > > > > > > > "slap on > > > > > > > the face" of the U.S was removed by the honor of a Noble Prize to > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > sitting U.S. President. > > > > > > > > The AP article made the reasons for the award quite clear. > > > > > > > 1. The Presidents initiatives to reduce nuclear weapons. > > > > > > > 2. His efforts to ease dangerous tensions with the Muslim world. > > > > > > > 3. His stress of diplomacy & cooperation rather than unilateralism > > > > > > > 4. He's been in office 9 months and has managed not to start a > > > > > > > single > > > > > > > war (OK, I added that one myself). > > > > > > > > Actually I personally do not consider his award as significant as > > > > > > > Jimmy Carter's. After all the peace accord he brokered between > > > > > > > Egypt > > > > > > > and Israel is STILL holding. Still, to be dismissive of the AWARD > > > > > > > itself just because it was awarded to someone you don't like is > > > > > > > silly. > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 9:52 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hollywood, > > > > > > > > > I'm not following the point you're trying to make. > > > > > > > > > A week ago people were complaining that Obama was wasting > > > > > > > > time/money > > > > > > > > traveling to Denmark to make a push for the Olympics. They also > > > > > > > > felt > > > > > > > > that it was an even greater slap in the face of Chicago/US that > > > > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > would make a personal plea and then get cut so early in the > > > > > > > > voting. So > > > > > > > > people questioned his motive, the waste of time & money, and the > > > > > > > > impact his being snubbed would have on him and the US. > > > > > > > > > How does this in any way relate to people now objecting that > > > > > > > > Obama be > > > > > > > > awarded a Nobel Peace Prize (a prize, btw, that is typically > > > > > > > > awarded > > > > > > > > to people who have actually achieved something) when he's not > > > > > > > > yet > > > > > > > > accomplished a thing? > > > > > > > > > I just don't get the connection between the two events... > > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 10:23 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > > > > Wait a minute there lad. Less than a week ago the world was > > > > > > > > > practically coming to an end because the U.S. did not get the > > > > > > > > > Olympics > > > > > > > > > and it was all the "fault" of President Obama. > > > > > > > > > Didn't you read the comments here? The WORLD was using the > > > > > > > > > President > > > > > > > > > as "a urinal", it was damaging to OUR prestige, one dumbass > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > suggested it just might be the "last straw" of indignities > > > > > > > > > heaped upon > > > > > > > > > our nation and their might be a military coup because of it. > > > > > > > > > > BUT NOW the freakin' NOBEL PEACE PRIZE is trivial & > > > > > > > > > unimportant????? > > > > > > > > > WTF? LMFAO!! > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 8:43 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Noting that the 4-H Club Blue Ribbon has really gained no > > > > > > > > > > additional > > > > > > > > > > luster over the decades, the International Committee on > > > > > > > > > > Prize Prestige > > > > > > > > > > added that it has lost no luster either. The flagging > > > > > > > > > > Nobel, on the > > > > > > > > > > other hand, began a steep descent when an apparently > > > > > > > > > > hysterical > > > > > > > > > > committee awarded the Peace Nobel to an unrepentant > > > > > > > > > > terrorist and an > > > > > > > > > > ineffectual ex-President Peanut decades ago. Subsequently, > > > > > > > > > > Nobel > > > > > > > > > > "Peace" prizes have been awarded to people for making > > > > > > > > > > inaccurate > > > > > > > > > > movies about the weather and now for being a man with black > > > > > > > > > > skin. > > > > > > > > > > Representatives from the 4-H Club, nonetheless, are > > > > > > > > > > celebrating their > > > > > > > > > > assent in prestige and are said to be considering a Blue > > > > > > > > > > Ribbon for > > > > > > > > > > "Peace" themselves.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
