Seems to me that the reporter should also be held responsible.  If the reporter misquoted the person they were interviewing is this not an error on their part and should they not also have responsibility in this case.  I would think the reporter should expect the interviewee to record the interview since the reporter is probably going to quote the person in the story.  Since the interview was recorded and the reporter did in fact misquote the interviewee, then I think the reporter should also have to pay a price for not doing her job.


Spokesman for Attorney General Brown resigns

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

Attorney General Jerry Brown's communications director, Scott Gerber, submitted his resignation Monday after admitting last week that he had secretly taped conversations with reporters.

In the letter to Chief Deputy Attorney General James Humes, Gerber said he was resigning "with a heavy heart" but emphasized that "neither the Attorney General nor any other attorneys from our office were aware that I was recording interviews without permission."

The questionable, perhaps illegal, behavior came to light after Gerber told the San Francisco Chronicle that one of its reporters had misquoted Humes based on Gerber's recording of the conversation between Humes and political writer Carla Marinucci.

Gerber had been placed on administrative leave after the Chronicle wrote about the incident Friday.

Recording private conversations without consent is illegal under California law.

The episode quickly emerged as an embarrassment for Brown, who is the sole Democratic hopeful in next year's governor's race.

Brown has yet to declare his candidacy. Gerber did not handle communications for Brown's political campaigns.

"I want to apologize to (Humes) and Attorney General Brown for failing to live up to the standards of the Office," Gerber wrote. "I also apologize to the reporters whose interviews I taped without permission. They deserved better from me."


Call Jack Chang, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5543.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at [email protected]. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to [email protected]. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Add a comment (max 1000 characters)

Comments: 4      Showing: Oldest first Newest first Most-recommended first Least-recommended first

  • rhomp2002 wrote on 11/03/2009 11:32:53 AM:

    Interesting that nobody seems to question the fact that the reporter misquoted the interviewee. Does that mean that reporters can keep doing that and know that the interviewee has no recourse to prove that the reporter misquoted them? Granted the reporter should have known they were being recorded, the reporter should have had a recording of her own to show that she did not misquote and to insure that she did not misquote the interviewee. Seems like the reporter is getting a pass on putting out false information and should be held responsible just as the spokesman for the AG is being held responsible for what he did. Both sides should have to pay for this one. Instead it seems the San Fran Chronicle is getting off for not doing its job.

  • PruittBlewIt wrote on 11/03/2009 08:50:11 AM:

    JERRY BROWN AKA GOVERNOR MOONBEAM WAS THE ROOT OF ALL OF CALIFORNIA'S PROBLEMS THAT STARTED WITH HIS LIBERAL, LEFTIST ADMINISTRATION IN THE 1970's.

    FOLKS, IF YOU WANT YOUR STATE TO LOOK LIKE OAKLAND, JUST VOTE FOR JERRY! THIS IS WHAT JERRY'S LIBERALISM WILL BRING YOU, A GANGLAND INFESTED STATE OF DRIVE-BY SHOOTINGS, HIGH CRIME AND ILLEGAL ALIENS.

  • Paris2006 wrote on 11/03/2009 08:32:47 AM:

    This kind of activity is far more worrying and ethically charged than any of the peccadilloes enumerated by the self-righteous commentators in the BEE's Duvall/sex worker articles.

  • mschliebs wrote on 11/03/2009 05:57:31 AM:

    Gerry Brown: "Ahem, just because Gerber violated the law doesn't mean that I, the attorney general, his boss, had anything to do with it. Vote for me and as governor I will change things."

More comments on this story: 1

Reply via email to