Hi Keith,
Yes that was Louise Slaughter (D NY) and her suggestion to
use this proceedure will fail and will be " deemed " unconstitutional
in court. There is precedent for this procedure but only for
ammendments to a law , not for a wholesale vote on new legislation or
in this case a New Healthcare bill that makes up 1/6 th of the
economy.
The constitution requires a straight up or down vote as prescribed in
( I believe ) Article I sections 5 & 7.
*********************************************************************************************************************
On Mar 18, 4:59 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> LOL Sage!!
>
> Usually, I find Studio's posts at least thoughtful.
>
> He missed the boat on this one.
>
> Maybe I am hearing incorrectly, but there was some Moonbat Congresswoman on
> CNN yesterday, describing how many laws had been "Deemed". Even the
> reporter was a bit taken aback. When asked several questions, it was
> obvious that she hadn't a friggin' clue about what she was talking about.
> Sounded a lot like Charlie Rangel, VT Sugarshack, and Hollywood.....
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Now all 3766 members understand why I call "
> > studio" ........ " stupido " it is more appropriate to his likeness
> > and image as a moonbat socialist !
>
> > ********************************************************************************************************
>
> > On Mar 17, 10:02 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mar 16, 11:50 am, studio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Do you think the majority of people do not want the health care reform
> > > > as it is currently proposed?
>
> > > I'll have to give the majority 3766 of our members a "maybe".
>
> > > But to the Republicans who said "no".
> > > It doesn't matter, we live in a Republic that doesn't have to listen
> > > to the majority. Don't you remember anything besides 911?
> > > How you like your Republic now?
>
> > > MJ wrote:
> > > > Seems as though were it 'embraced' by the appropriate number
> > > > to entail a mob ... such shenanigans would be unnecessary.
>
> > > According to Republicans, it isn't a majority mob. And they like and
> > > even praise the fact we live in a Republic where that can happen.
>
> > > > From what I understand a 'shell' is going to be voted upon -- what
> > > > is in it is meaningless.
>
> > > Then you're falling victim of hype. That's not necessarily how it will
> > > happen. It's probably just a tactic.
> > > Don't you just love how capitalism gives us all extremely accurate
> > > information about everything that goes on?
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community
> > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
politicalforum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
