What I said was that even fire departments in PODUNK are trained in this
manner and they recieve this training and annual updates because of Federal
Mandate/Law. Again first hand info. Whether or not New York FD follows
Federal Law in its training was not part of my treatise. I would however
make a reasonable assumption that they are indeed subject to the same
Federal Guidelines.



On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM, reallyconservative <
[email protected]> wrote:

> You have proof the staff firefighters were ALL provided with that info
> and provided respirators?  Then why didn't you testify at that trial
> (since the city apparently had no such proof)?
>
> On Mar 21, 2:19 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > They therefore obviously entered despite their training and are at "own
> > risk".... MSDS is inviolable... That, too, is in the training.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:15 PM, reallyconservative <
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > To say that FDNY did not know or have access or have notice is just
> > > BULLSHIT
> > > --
> >
> > > Who said they didn't?  In fact, one of the links I posted states quite
> > > clearly that they did or should have known and made sure all of their
> > > firefighters were equipped with respirators long before 9/11.
> >
> > > On Mar 21, 1:53 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I just talked to an old friend of mine that is the Volunteer fire
> chief
> > > for
> > > > a small town in Ohio.... They have the records for every site that
> > > contains
> > > > hazardous materials in their service area and have "By Federal Law"
> > > > maintained such records since the early 70's when he joined the
> group.
> >
> > > > To say that FDNY did not know or have access or have notice is just
> > > BULLSHIT
> > > > !!! By federal law even a fire unit in PODUNK, USA covers this with
> ALL
> > > > entrants and has done so for 40 + years.
> >
> > > > Maybe those "trained professionals" decided to forego their training
> and
> > > > listen to "hearsay".... tough shit.
> >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, reallyconservative <
> >
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, everyone who disagrees with you is a liar and full of shit.
> >
> > > > >
> http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/02/28/2010-02-28_a_911_smoki.
> > > ..
> >
> > > > > No - the city and feds never told people the air was safe to
> breathe:
> >
> > > > >http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/02/07/usat-wtc-acov.htm
> >
> > > > > Nah, there was no problem with enforcing regulations that required
> > > > > people to wear respirators:
> >
> > > > > Remarkably, not one fatal accident occurred on the pile. But the
> > > > > city’s inspectors found that by late October, only 29 percent of
> > > > > ground zero workers were wearing the sophisticated respirators that
> > > > > were required by OSHA. Even Mr. Giuliani sometimes showed up
> without
> > > > > one.
> >
> > > > >
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/nyregion/14giuliani.html?_r=1&pagew.
> > > ..
> >
> > > > > Nah, no ground zero workers or residents have died from rare lung
> > > > > diseases:
> >
> > > > >
> http://autoimmunedisease.suite101.com/article.cfm/post_911_sarcoidosis
> >
> > > > > And while I agree that if the masks and proper warnings were indeed
> > > > > provided to everyone in danger, those who chose to not wear them
> have
> > > > > nobody to blame but themselves, it doesn't appear that the proper
> > > > > warnings were provided NOR the respirators to all of those at
> Ground
> > > > > Zero from day one.
> >
> > > > > On Mar 20, 11:11 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > As one who worked in that area, you are full of s*it.  The city
> had
> > > > > > special setups all over the place with EMT, face masks, bottled
> > > liquids
> > > > > > 24/7 for weeks after the event.   We were not even permitted to
> go to
> > > > > > work for 3 weeks and even then they still had all the EMT, face
> > > masks,
> > > > > > bottled liquids after that.   The technicians were all over the
> place
> > > to
> > > > > > see that people were safe.  What more could they do.  I know what
> > > they
> > > > > > did.  I was there.  I worked in that area.   I have emphysema and
> > > they
> > > > > > sure saw that I was safe.  You really do not know what you are
> > > talking
> > > > > > about.
> >
> > > > > > reallyconservative wrote:
> > > > > > > Not true.  Apparently there were a ton of toxins (including
> > > asbestos
> > > > > > > and benzene) in that rubble.  And the workers were told not to
> > > concern
> > > > > > > themselves with it and to go about their business.  That's
> > > > > > > negligence.  The city (or the leaders of the first responders)
> > > should
> > > > > > > have made sure all of them wore protective masks before digging
> in
> > > > > > > that rubble.
> >
> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 10:34 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >> Why in the hell would ANYONE get a settlement unless they were
> > > suing
> > > > > > >> al-Qaeda ??? The only "fault" or action lies with them.....
> >
> > > > > > >> Talk about drinkin' kool-aid !!!!!!!
> >
> > > > > > >> On Mar 20, 1:12 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >>>           Originally published 12:05 a.m., March 20, 2010,
> > > updated
> > > > > 12:30
> > > > > > >>>           a.m., March 20, 2010
> >
> > > > > > >>>   Judge rejects settlement for 9/11 rescuers
> >
> > > > > > >>> ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >
> > > > > > >>> NEW YORK | A federal judge on Friday rejected a legal
> settlement
> > > that
> > > > > > >>> would have given at least $575 million to people sickened by
> ash
> > > and
> > > > > > >>> dust from the World Trade Center, saying the deal
> shortchanged
> > > 10,000
> > > > > > >>> ground zero workers whom he called heroes.
> >
> > > > > > >>> "In my judgment, this settlement is not enough," said U.S.
> > > District
> > > > > > >>> Judge Alvin Hellerstein, who delivered his pronouncement to a
> > > stunned
> > > > > > >>> gallery at a federal courthouse in Manhattan.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Rising from his chair, the 76-year-old jurist said he feared
> > > police
> > > > > > >>> officers, firefighters and other laborers who cleared rubble
> > > after
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks were being pushed into signing
> a
> > > deal
> > > > > few
> > > > > > >>> of them understood.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Under the terms of the settlement, workers had been given
> just 90
> > > > > days
> > > > > > >>> to say yes or no to a deal that would have assigned them
> payments
> > > > > based
> > > > > > >>> on a point system that Hellerstein said was complicated
> enough to
> > > > > make a
> > > > > > >>> Talmudic scholar's head spin.
> >
> > > > > > >>> "I will not preside over a settlement that is based on fear
> or
> > > > > > >>> ignorance," he said.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Of the proposed settlement of $575 million to $657 million,
> > > workers
> > > > > > >>> stood to get amounts ranging from a few thousand dollars to
> more
> > > than
> > > > > $1
> > > > > > >>> million.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein said the deal should be richer. Too much of it
> would
> > > be
> > > > > > >>> eaten up by legal fees, he said.
> >
> > > > > > >>> A third or more of the money set aside for the workers was
> > > expected
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >>> go to their lawyers. Some plaintiffs had agreed at the start
> of
> > > the
> > > > > case
> > > > > > >>> to give as much as 40 percent of any judgment to cover fees
> and
> > > > > > >>> expenses. That might have meant $200 million or more going to
> > > > > attorneys.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein, who presides over all federal court litigation
> > > related
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >>> the terror attacks, ripped into the agreement after hearing
> > > several
> > > > > > >>> ground zero responders speak tearfully of their illnesses and
> > > after
> > > > > > >>> receiving letters and phone calls from others expressing
> > > confusion
> > > > > about
> > > > > > >>> the deal.
> >
> > > > > > >>> He said he was speaking "from the heart" out of great
> compassion
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> thousands of men and women who spent time at ground zero.
> >
> > > > > > >>> It wasn't immediately clear whether the judge's actions would
> > > kill
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> settlement entirely.
> >
> > > > > > >>> The deal had taken years to negotiate and was announced March
> 11,
> > > > > with
> > > > > > >>> about two months to go until the first trials.
> >
> > > > > > >>> A spokeswoman for the law partnership that negotiated the
> > > settlement
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >>> behalf of the workers said she had no comment on the judge's
> > > remarks.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Christine LaSala, president of the WTC Captive Insurance Co.,
> a
> > > > > special
> > > > > > >>> insurance entity created by Congress to represent the city in
> the
> > > > > > >>> lawsuit, said the judge "has now made it more difficult, if
> not
> > > > > > >>> impossible, for the people bringing these claims to obtain
> > > > > compensation
> > > > > > >>> and a settlement."
> >
> > > > > > >>> She said the lawyers would confer with city officials and
> "try to
> > > > > find a
> > > > > > >>> way forward."
> >
> > > > > > >>> New York City's chief lawyer, Michael Cardozo, said, "We have
> > > great
> > > > > > >>> respect for Judge Hellerstein and will consider his comments,
> but
> > > his
> > > > > > >>> reaction to the settlement will make it extremely difficult
> to
> > > > > resolve
> > > > > > >>> these cases."
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein laid out a number of proposed fixes for what he
> saw
> > > as
> > > > > > >>> deficiencies in the settlement and told the two sides to
> resume
> > > > > > >>> negotiations.
> >
> > > > > > >>> He rejected the idea that a third or more of the money should
> go
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> plaintiffs' lawyers and said the legal fees should be paid by
> the
> > > WTC
> > > > > > >>> Captive, not the workers.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein said workers should have ample opportunities to
> ask
> > > > > > >>> questions and get answers about the settlement, and he
> offered to
> > > go
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >>> a mini-speaking tour to get information to the plaintiffs.
> >
> > > > > > >>> "I will make myself available in union halls, fire department
> > > houses,
> > > > > > >>> police precincts and schools," Hellerstein said.
> >
> > > > > > >>> He said more money should be set aside for people who later
> > > develop
> > > > > > >>> cancer that may be linked to ground zero toxins. He said he
> > > wanted to
> > > > > > >>> retain ultimate control over which workers were entitled to
> have
> > > > > claims
> > > > > > >>> paid.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein acknowledged that he felt a personal connection
> to
> > > the
> > > > > case,
> > > > > > >>> calling it "the greatest burden in my life," but insisted
> that
> > > his
> > > > > > >>> unusual intervention was legally and morally necessary, given
> the
> > > > > > >>> importance of the Sept. 11 attacks to the country.
> >
> > > > > > >>> "This is no ego trip for me. This is work," he said.
> >
> > > > > > >>> Hellerstein spoke after several ground zero recovery workers
> had
> > > > > risen
> > > > > > >>> in court to describe a litany of health problems they believe
> are
> > > > > linked
> > > > > > >>> to inhaling the ash and dust left by the collapse of the
> World
> > > Trade
> > > > > > >>> Center.
> >
> > > > > > >>> The settlement rejected by the judge would have created a
> pool of
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to politicalforum+
> unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE
> ME" as the subject.
>



-- 
Mark M. Kahle,  ,
www.filacoffee.com

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
politicalforum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to