WE'VE SEEN THIS (AND WORSE) BEFORE.... Following up on an _earlier item_ 
(http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/023849.php) , 
Connecticut Attorney General Richard  Blumenthal (D) clearly has a problem on 
his hands, after _misleading rhetoric_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html?hp)  about his 
Vietnam-era military  service. As 
far as the political implications go, there's one key question: is  this 
controversy survivable, or is it a career-killer? 
We'll know fairly quickly whether Blumenthal can persevere -- either he and 
 his campaign will be effective in responding to this, or it won't. 
Blumenthal  hasn't been tested much as a candidate, and this will clearly 
constitute the  biggest test of his professional life. 
But speaking generally, it's not unreasonable to think a politician can  
survive -- and even thrive -- after a controversy like this one. One  
particularly high-profile figure comes to mind. 
Remember George W. Bush? 
You may recall, for example, that when Bush launched an unsuccessful  
congressional campaign, he claimed to have "_served in the U.S. Air Force_ 
(http://www.eschatonblog.com/2004_09_12_atrios_archive.html#109500958708998636) 
." 
 That was clearly not true. 
In 2002, Bush claimed that he'd "_been to war_ 
(http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0309.mendacity-experts.html) ." 
That was clearly  not 
true, either. 
In many instances, Bush claimed to have completed his obligations to  the 
Texas Air National Guard. Again, _that wasn't true_ 
(http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/roane040908.htm) . 
In 2007, Bush claimed to have "_firsthand_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/11/09/BL2007110901363_pf.html)
 " experience with the 
 consequences of combat. That, at a minimum, is misleading. 
My point here is not to rehash the former president's deceptive 
descriptions  of his military service. My point is that a politician can be 
caught 
misleading  voters about a service record, and still do very well on Election 
Day. In Bush's  case, he made dishonest claims about serving, and managed to 
nevertheless get  elected president -- twice.—_Steve Benen_ 
(mailto:[email protected])  8:35 AM _Permalink_ 
(http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/023850.php) 

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to