Perl was killed because he was a jew - not because he was journalist

some don't forget

On May 22, 8:31 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> After all Daniel Pearl was one of their own.  Does the death of one of
> their own really mean so little to the media?
>
>   Establishment Press Largely Covers Obama's Tracks on Disgraceful
>   Daniel Pearl Remark
>   <http://www.bizzyblog.com/2010/05/22/establishment-press-largely-cover...>
>
> Filed under: MSM Biz/Other Bias
> <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-bias/>, MSM Biz/Other
> Ignorance <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-ignorance/>, Taxes
> & Government <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/taxes-government/> ---
> TBlumer @ 10:33 am
>
> DanielPearlInIslamistCaptorsVid2002President Barack Obama's statement
> just before he signed the Freedom of the Press Act on Monday painfully
> avoided reality to the point of giving offense. If it became widely
> known, it would likely become very problematic.
>
> Here is what the President said
> <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-signing-...>
> that was particularly offensive (bolds are mine):
>
>     And obviously *the loss* of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments
>     that *captured the world's imagination* because it reminded us of
>     how valuable a free press is, and it reminded us that there are
>     those who would go to any length in order to silence journalists
>     around the world.
>
> Two key administration-protecting original news disseminators picked up
> on the need to keep the bolded words out of their news coverage of the
> event. The Associated Press, which usually (i.e., almost always) quotes
> the president in related stories, provided no quotes in its terse
> five-paragraph report
> <http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h3WHtDXRETxBP2JN2_i...>,
> the first four of which follow (for fair use and discussion purposes, of
> course):
>
>     *Obama signs Freedom of Press Act*
>
>     President Barack Obama has signed a law intended to provide more
>     protections for a free press around the world.
>
>     The law, the Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act, expands efforts to
>     identify countries where press freedom is being violated. The law is
>     named after Pearl, a Wall Street Journal reporter who was beheaded
>     by militants in Pakistan in 2002.
>
>     The law expands an annual report on human rights practices to
>     include information about media treatment, and identify countries
>     where the media is being repressed.
>
>     Obama said the law would be a signal to governments around the world
>     that their actions, including treatment of the media, are being watched.
>
> The New York Times's five-paragraph story
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/world/18press.html?scp=2&sq=daniel+...>
> quoted other portions of Obama's statement:
>
>     *U.S. to Promote Press Freedom*
>
>     President Obama signed legislation on Monday intended to promote a
>     free press around the world, a bipartisan measure inspired by the
>     murder in Pakistan of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal
>     reporter, shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
>
>     ... The new law "puts us clearly on the side of journalistic
>     freedom," Mr. Obama said, praising Mr. Pearl's family for being
>     "outspoken and so courageous" in pursuing the cause. With the law,
>     the president added, "his legacy lives on."
>
> The less influential wire service AFP must not have gotten the memo, as
> carried it the statement quoted above. Its 10-paragraph story
> <http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5glN6l4afLkwukZGjvR...>
> also provided historical context AP and the Times avoided, as well as a
> clearly superior headline:
>
>     *Obama signs law honoring slain reporter Daniel Pearl*
>
>     ..."The loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured
>     the world's imagination because it reminded us how valuable a free
>     press is," Obama said.
>
>     ... Pearl, 38, was the South Asia bureau chief for The Wall Street
>     Journal when he was abducted in Karachi on January 23, 2002 while
>     researching a story about Islamist militants.
>
>     A graphic video showing his decapitation was delivered to the US
>     consulate in the city nearly a month later.
>
>     Mariane Pearl was pregnant with their son when her husband was murdered.
>
>     In 2007, she filed a lawsuit Wednesday against 23 individuals and
>     organizations over the abduction and murder of Pearl, naming
>     Al-Qaeda, the group's alleged mastermind kingpin Khalid Sheikh
>     Mohammed --- who claimed responsibility for beheading Pearl and is
>     now in US custody --- and Pakistan's Habib Bank among the defendants.
>
> In his column
> <http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/pearl-249812-daniel-obama.html>
> today, Mark Steyn finishes the job AFP only began. As usual with Steyn,
> read the whole thing. Here are selected paragraphs:
>
>     ... its clumsiness and insipidness is most revealing. First of all,
>     note the passivity: "The loss of Daniel Pearl." He wasn't "lost." He
>     was kidnapped and beheaded. He was murdered on a snuff video. He was
>     specifically targeted, seized as a trophy, a high-value scalp. And
>     the circumstances of his "loss" merit some vigor in the prose. Yet
>     Obama can muster none.
>
>     Even if Americans don't get the message, the rest of the world does.
>     This week's pictures of the leaders of Brazil and Turkey clasping
>     hands with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are also monuments to American passivity.
>
>     But what did the "loss" of Daniel Pearl mean? Well, says the
>     president, it was "one of those moments that captured the world's
>     imagination." Really? Evidently it never captured Obama's
>     imagination because, if it had, he could never have uttered anything
>     so fatuous. He seems literally unable to imagine Pearl's fate, and
>     so, cruising on autopilot, he reaches for the all-purpose bromides
>     of therapeutic sedation: "one of those moments" -- you know, like
>     Princess Di's wedding, Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction,
>     whatever -- "that captured the world's imagination."
>
>     Notice how reflexively Obama lapses into sentimental one-worldism:
>     Despite our many zip codes, we are one people, with a single
>     imagination. In fact, the murder of Daniel Pearl teaches just the
>     opposite -- that we are many worlds, and worlds within worlds. Some
>     of them don't even need an "imagination." Across the planet, the
>     video of an American getting his head sawed off did brisk business
>     in the bazaars and madrassahs and Internet downloads. Excited young
>     men e-mailed it to friends, from cell phone to cell phone, from
>     Karachi to Jakarta to Khartoum to London to Toronto to Falls Church,
>     Virginia. In the old days, you needed an "imagination" to conjure
>     the juicy bits of a distant victory over the Great Satan. But in an
>     age of high-tech barbarism the sight of Pearl's severed head is a
>     mere click away.
>
>     And the rest of "the world"? Most gave a shrug of indifference. And
>     far too many found the reality of Pearl's death too uncomfortable,
>     and chose to take refuge in the same kind of delusional pap as Obama.
>
> I daresay that if a Republican or conservative president had suggested
> that the "loss" of Dr. Martin Luther King had "captured the world's
> imagination," the AP and the Times would not have so deliberately
> avoided such a statement, and would instead have eagerly sought out
> others to criticize it.
>
> /Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org
> <http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2010/05/22/establishment-pres...>.
> /
>
> /http://www.bizzyblog.com/2010/05/22/establishment-press-largely-cover...
> /
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>  DanielPearlInIslamistCaptorsVid2002.jpg
> 28KViewDownload

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to