After all Daniel Pearl was one of their own. Does the death of one of
their own really mean so little to the media?
Establishment Press Largely Covers Obama's Tracks on Disgraceful
Daniel Pearl Remark
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2010/05/22/establishment-press-largely-cover...>
Filed under: MSM Biz/Other Bias
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-bias/>, MSM Biz/Other
Ignorance <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/msm-biz-ignorance/>, Taxes
& Government <http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/taxes-government/> ---
TBlumer @ 10:33 am
DanielPearlInIslamistCaptorsVid2002President Barack Obama's statement
just before he signed the Freedom of the Press Act on Monday painfully
avoided reality to the point of giving offense. If it became widely
known, it would likely become very problematic.
Here is what the President said
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-signing-...>
that was particularly offensive (bolds are mine):
And obviously *the loss* of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments
that *captured the world's imagination* because it reminded us of
how valuable a free press is, and it reminded us that there are
those who would go to any length in order to silence journalists
around the world.
Two key administration-protecting original news disseminators picked up
on the need to keep the bolded words out of their news coverage of the
event. The Associated Press, which usually (i.e., almost always) quotes
the president in related stories, provided no quotes in its terse
five-paragraph report
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h3WHtDXRETxBP2JN2_i...>,
the first four of which follow (for fair use and discussion purposes, of
course):
*Obama signs Freedom of Press Act*
President Barack Obama has signed a law intended to provide more
protections for a free press around the world.
The law, the Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act, expands efforts to
identify countries where press freedom is being violated. The law is
named after Pearl, a Wall Street Journal reporter who was beheaded
by militants in Pakistan in 2002.
The law expands an annual report on human rights practices to
include information about media treatment, and identify countries
where the media is being repressed.
Obama said the law would be a signal to governments around the world
that their actions, including treatment of the media, are being watched.
The New York Times's five-paragraph story
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/world/18press.html?scp=2&sq=daniel+...>
quoted other portions of Obama's statement:
*U.S. to Promote Press Freedom*
President Obama signed legislation on Monday intended to promote a
free press around the world, a bipartisan measure inspired by the
murder in Pakistan of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal
reporter, shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
... The new law "puts us clearly on the side of journalistic
freedom," Mr. Obama said, praising Mr. Pearl's family for being
"outspoken and so courageous" in pursuing the cause. With the law,
the president added, "his legacy lives on."
The less influential wire service AFP must not have gotten the memo, as
carried it the statement quoted above. Its 10-paragraph story
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5glN6l4afLkwukZGjvR...>
also provided historical context AP and the Times avoided, as well as a
clearly superior headline:
*Obama signs law honoring slain reporter Daniel Pearl*
..."The loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured
the world's imagination because it reminded us how valuable a free
press is," Obama said.
... Pearl, 38, was the South Asia bureau chief for The Wall Street
Journal when he was abducted in Karachi on January 23, 2002 while
researching a story about Islamist militants.
A graphic video showing his decapitation was delivered to the US
consulate in the city nearly a month later.
Mariane Pearl was pregnant with their son when her husband was murdered.
In 2007, she filed a lawsuit Wednesday against 23 individuals and
organizations over the abduction and murder of Pearl, naming
Al-Qaeda, the group's alleged mastermind kingpin Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed --- who claimed responsibility for beheading Pearl and is
now in US custody --- and Pakistan's Habib Bank among the defendants.
In his column
<http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/pearl-249812-daniel-obama.html>
today, Mark Steyn finishes the job AFP only began. As usual with Steyn,
read the whole thing. Here are selected paragraphs:
... its clumsiness and insipidness is most revealing. First of all,
note the passivity: "The loss of Daniel Pearl." He wasn't "lost." He
was kidnapped and beheaded. He was murdered on a snuff video. He was
specifically targeted, seized as a trophy, a high-value scalp. And
the circumstances of his "loss" merit some vigor in the prose. Yet
Obama can muster none.
Even if Americans don't get the message, the rest of the world does.
This week's pictures of the leaders of Brazil and Turkey clasping
hands with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are also monuments to American passivity.
But what did the "loss" of Daniel Pearl mean? Well, says the
president, it was "one of those moments that captured the world's
imagination." Really? Evidently it never captured Obama's
imagination because, if it had, he could never have uttered anything
so fatuous. He seems literally unable to imagine Pearl's fate, and
so, cruising on autopilot, he reaches for the all-purpose bromides
of therapeutic sedation: "one of those moments" -- you know, like
Princess Di's wedding, Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction,
whatever -- "that captured the world's imagination."
Notice how reflexively Obama lapses into sentimental one-worldism:
Despite our many zip codes, we are one people, with a single
imagination. In fact, the murder of Daniel Pearl teaches just the
opposite -- that we are many worlds, and worlds within worlds. Some
of them don't even need an "imagination." Across the planet, the
video of an American getting his head sawed off did brisk business
in the bazaars and madrassahs and Internet downloads. Excited young
men e-mailed it to friends, from cell phone to cell phone, from
Karachi to Jakarta to Khartoum to London to Toronto to Falls Church,
Virginia. In the old days, you needed an "imagination" to conjure
the juicy bits of a distant victory over the Great Satan. But in an
age of high-tech barbarism the sight of Pearl's severed head is a
mere click away.
And the rest of "the world"? Most gave a shrug of indifference. And
far too many found the reality of Pearl's death too uncomfortable,
and chose to take refuge in the same kind of delusional pap as Obama.
I daresay that if a Republican or conservative president had suggested
that the "loss" of Dr. Martin Luther King had "captured the world's
imagination," the AP and the Times would not have so deliberately
avoided such a statement, and would instead have eagerly sought out
others to criticize it.
/Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org
<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2010/05/22/establishment-pres...>.
/
/http://www.bizzyblog.com/2010/05/22/establishment-press-largely-cover...
/
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
DanielPearlInIslamistCaptorsVid2002.jpg
28KViewDownload
