Interesting.  Thanks. was not familiar with that case.

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM, MANOJ <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Please read the following link to understand the mindset of the so
> called non-radical Muslims..
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shah_Bano_case
>
> -MP
>
> On Aug 2, 4:02 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010080111207/editorial/12-reasons-to-ig...
> > dical-islam.html
> >
> > 12 Reasons to Ignore Radical Islam
> > SUNDAY, 01 AUGUST 2010 17:12 FRESNOZIONISM.ORG<http://fresnozionism.org/><
> http://fresnozionism.org/>
>  >
> > Parents and spouses of firefighters lost on 9/11 take part in a protest
> > against the Ground Zero mosque on June 6, 2010
> > NY Times:
> > An influential Jewish organization [ADL] on Friday announced its
> opposition
> > to a proposed Islamic center and mosque two blocks north of ground zero
> in
> > Lower Manhattan, intensifying a fierce national debate about the limits
> of
> > religious freedom and the meaning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
> >
> > Wrong.
> >
> > It is not about "the limits of religious freedom". Nobody wants to limit
> the
> > freedom of Muslims or anyone else to practice their religion, always
> > assuming that the practice thereof violates no laws.
> >
> > It is not about the meaning of 9/11. Even Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf agrees
> that
> > that was a terrorist attack perpetrated by radical Islamists.
> >
> > No, it's not about those things. It is about whether we should allow  a
> > monument for the first step in the Islamic conquest of America - because
> > that is how it will be seen in the Islamic world - in a place where 2,750
> > people were burned or crushed to death in the name of Islam.
> >
> > And here's another thing it's not about: domestic politics. The Times
> > writer, Michael Barbaro, wants us to think that it's just another
> partisan
> > issue:
> > ...around the country opposition is mounting, fueled in part by
> Republican
> > leaders and conservative pundits. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican
> > vice-presidential nominee, has urged "peace-seeking Muslims" to reject
> the
> > center, branding it an "unnecessary provocation." A Republican political
> > action committee has produced a television commercial assailing the
> > proposal. And former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has decried it in
> speeches.
> >
> > Yeah, that's it. The whole thing is 'fueled' by nasty Republicans and
> worse.
> > Sarah Palin is radioactive to most Democrats and centrist Republicans, so
> > Mr. Barbaro makes sure to mention her, although her statement is
> > comparatively mild.
> >
> > Newt Gingrich, on the other hand - who, I will remind you, holds a Ph.D
> in
> > History - nailed it when he said.
> >
> > "The World Trade Center is the largest loss of American life on our soil
> > since the Civil War," Mr. Gingrich said. "And we have not rebuilt it,
> which
> > drives people crazy. And in that setting, we are told, why don't we have
> a
> > 13-story mosque and community center?"
> >
> > He added: "The average American just thinks this is a political
> statement.
> > It's not about religion, and is clearly an aggressive act that is
> > offensive."
> >
> > Indeed. Anyone who can't see the strands of politics and ideology - a
> > particularly nasty form of expansionist politics and an anti-democratic,
> > medieval ideology - woven throughout Islam, is blind.
> >
> > The ADL didn't go there. The ADL's statement that the Times said "touched
> > off angry reactions from a range of religious groups," merely suggested
> that
> > in deference to the expressed feelings of many of the 9/11 families, the
> > mosque should be built somewhere else.
> >
> > This argument - an appeal to decency -  ought to be enough. But it's not,
> > for reasons which I am just beginning to analyze.
> >
> > Some suggest that opposition to the mosque stems from 'bigotry', which in
> > their circles is the worst imaginable personality defect. But
> interestingly,
> > many of the same people wax furious about the Christian Right. Somehow,
> it
> > is bigoted to attack some forms of religious ideology, but not others.
> >
> > Here are some of the reasons for not seeing the danger posed to the US by
> > radical Islam:
> >
> > 1. You are a Muslim who thinks it would be better if the US were governed
> in
> > accordance with Shaaria
> >
> > 2. You benefit in some way from Saudi petrodollars (this group includes
> > several ex-presidents)
> >
> > 3. You are an anti-Zionist or antisemite who wants to stick it to the
> Jews
> >
> > 4. You are Jewish and want to show your goyische friends that you're a
> > regular guy
> >
> > 5. You are afraid that Islam will be victorious and you want your future
> > rulers to like you
> >
> > 6. You are afraid but want to hide it, so you pretend that there's no
> danger
> >
> > 7. You want to back the 'strong horse'
> >
> > 8. You are a progressive and you see other progressives (including the
> > President) pretending that there's no danger, so you imitate them
> >
> > 9. You want to be on the other side of Newt Gingrich and especially Sarah
> > Palin
> >
> > 10. You are white and think opposing Islamic expansionism is racist and
> you
> > feel guilty for slavery and racism
> >
> > 11. You are black and think Islam is on the side of oppressed people of
> > color (never mind Sudan, the history of slavery, etc.)
> >
> > 12. You listen to KPFA [a Berkeley radio station] and have become
> convinced
> > that the US really is the great Satan and anything bad that happens to it
> is
> > good
>
>  --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to