You really think Vice-President Chew Gum would be worse? On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:28 PM, GWH <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would really like to get Obambam impeached except for the fact what we > would end up with is worse than what we have. Hmmmmm, I do not think it > could be much worse. > > My sone called me today very upset, he had to lay off one of his employees > today. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Travis <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:08 PM > *Subject:* Re: I wonder if this is the first stage for setting prices > based on the grade the cars get - sounds like it would be the next stage > > Comes right after they price the snacks in vending machines based on the > calorie count. > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:13 AM, dick thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | EPA Proposes Grading System For Car Fuel Economy >> | >> | from the miles-per-gallon-per-dead-otter dept. >> | >> | posted by Soulskill on Monday August 30, @22:05 (Transportation) >> | >> | >> https://news.slashdot.org/story/10/08/30/2325259/EPA-Proposes-Grading-System-For-Car-Fuel-E|<https://news.slashdot.org/story/10/08/30/2325259/EPA-Proposes-Grading-System-For-Car-Fuel-E%7C> >> >> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> suraj.sun writes with this snippet from CNET: "The EPA and Department of >> Transportation on Monday [0]proposed a fuel economy label overhaul to >> reflect how electric and alternative fuel vehicles stack up against >> gasoline passenger vehicles. ... The changed label, mandated by the 2007 >> energy law, includes the same information on city and highway miles per >> gallon and estimated driving costs based on 15,000 miles a year now >> available. But the new labels add more comparative information, rating >> cars on mileage, greenhouse gas contribution, and other air pollutants >> from tailpipe emissions. That means that consumers can look at a label to >> see how one vehicle compares to all available vehicles, rather than only >> cars in a specific class. One label proposes grades, ranging from an >> A-plus to a D. There are no failing grades, since vehicles need to comply >> with the Clean Air Act." >> >> Discuss this story at: >> http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10/08/30/2325259 >> >> Links: >> 0.http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-20015069-54.html >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> * It's active >> and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the >> latest breaking news, and more. > > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
