Barney Frank was censured for a single violation (granted, it was a doozy). Shouldn't 11 warrant a reprimand?
On Nov 18, 8:41 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > He will likely escape much of anything (do not want additional > precedents). He will, however, be the Republican whipping boy for at > least the next two years. Gots to emphasize something as a difference. > > Regard$, > --MJ > > ... where corruption and public crimes are not carefully opposed, > and severely punished, neither liberty nor security can possibly > subsist. -- Cato's Letters (1721) > > At 08:32 AM 11/18/2010, you wrote: > > > > >Reprimand is doubtful, Public statement "deploring his conduct" is > >the likely "penalty" > > >On Nov 18, 7:41 am, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Charlie learns his fate today. Bela Pelosi has done such a > > wonderful job of "draining the swamp". > > > > Rangel will be reprimanded and then go on "business as usual". Sad. > > > >http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-charles-rangel-faces-sanctions-eth... > > >-- > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
