Hey Greg,

No, they are not, but "DaBabyMama"  who has five kids and is a continuous
breeder solely for the purpose of generating revenue count the same as my
vote.  This is the predominant make-up of the Gerrymandered Congressional
District where Charlie Rangel depends upon for his support.

Even using your example, a college student who is dependent upon Pell Grants
and generates nothing in the way of tax dollar revenue; his vote counts the
same as mine.

I just think that it is an interesting concept of voting, and why
votes should count the same.  Maybe the college student should deserve a
vote, but then, why shouldn't my vote be counted a bit more?  Why not give
"DaBabyMama"  a single vote, the college kid two votes, and give
taxpaying citizens who also pay property taxes ten votes?

Why is there such a push by these far left extremist groups, to register
voters, and it has been well documented that they have registered illegal
aliens who should not have a vote, as well as fictional individuals, or
folks like DaBabyMama  who have registered numerous times under fictitious
addresses?

Just some general thoughts is all.....



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, GregfromBoston <[email protected]>wrote:

> Why should my vote, as a taxpayer, be
> of the same value as someone who is totally dependent upon federal or
> state
> subsistence?
> ---------------------------
>
> Well ya didn't say that.  Thats more interesting, but still a rather
> major problem.
>
> People who live in apartments and students (at least the males of whom
> are  REQUIRED to register for selective service) are not, "totally
> dependent upon federal or state subsistence"
>
>
> On Nov 18, 12:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree that it will never happen, and I am not exactly serious when I
> even
> > suggest such a notion.
> >
> > I only throw the thought out there.   Why should my vote, as a taxpayer,
> be
> > of the same value as someone who is totally dependent upon federal or
> state
> > subsistence?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, GregfromBoston <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>  >
> >
> >
> > > I can't go along with that man.  You can't vote because you live in an
> > > apartment or are a full time student?
> >
> > > Not a chance in hell, ever.
> >
> > > On Nov 18, 11:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > This is what happens, when we continue to allow for Gerrymandered
> > > > districts.
> >
> > > > This is but one more reason to reconsider allowing only taxpaying
> > > > individuals who are property owners the right to vote.
> >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:00 AM, GregfromBoston <
> [email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> >
> > > > > Agreed.  But censure trumps reprimand, and reprimand trumps,
> > > > > "deploring".
> >
> > > > > What is less than meaningless?
> >
> > > > > We're about to find out.
> >
> > > > > Censure didn't effect Barny Frank or Gerry Studds an inch (ooh, bad
> > > > > pun), but hey, this is Massachusetts.
> >
> > > > > On Nov 18, 10:54 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Censure is largely meaningless -- the type of chiding
> > > > > > he will likely receive.
> >
> > > > > > At 09:33 AM 11/18/2010, you wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >Barney Frank was censured for a single violation (granted, it
> was a
> > > > > > >doozy).  Shouldn't 11 warrant a reprimand?
> >
> > > > > > >On Nov 18, 8:41 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > He will likely escape much of anything (do not want
> additional
> > > > > > > > precedents).  He will, however, be the Republican whipping
> boy
> > > for at
> > > > > > > > least the next two years.  Gots to emphasize something as a
> > > > > difference.
> >
> > > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > > --MJ
> >
> > > > > > > > ... where corruption and public crimes are not carefully
> opposed,
> > > > > > > > and severely punished, neither liberty nor security can
> possibly
> > > > > > > > subsist. -- Cato's Letters (1721)
> >
> > > > > > > > At 08:32 AM 11/18/2010, you wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >Reprimand is doubtful,  Public statement "deploring his
> conduct"
> > > is
> > > > > > > > >the likely "penalty"
> >
> > > > > > > > >On Nov 18, 7:41 am, Cold Water <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Charlie learns his fate today.  Bela Pelosi has done such
> a
> > > > > > > > > wonderful job of "draining the swamp".
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Rangel will be reprimanded and then go on "business as
> > > usual".
> > > > >  Sad.
> >
> > > > >
> http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-charles-rangel-faces-sanctions-eth.
> > > ..
> >
> > > > > > > > >--
> > > > > > > > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > > >For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > > > > > > >* Visit our other community athttp://
> www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/><
> http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > > > > > > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text
> -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > >For options & help seehttp://
> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > > > > >* Visit our other community 
> > > > > > >athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > > > > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > > > * Visit our other community 
> > > > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > >  > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > * Visit our other community 
> > > athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to