The Department of Justice is obliged to uphold existing laws. President Obama wants Congress to repeal DADT.
On 12/12/10, GregfromBoston <[email protected]> wrote: > The 9th District Court of Appeals ruled DADT unconstitutional and > issued an injunction against its further practice. > > THAT is killed mate. You know - dead, over, toast, kaput. > > Someone is challenging that ruling, and it ain't no republican. > > Stop denying that will ya? > > On Dec 11, 11:10 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, it failed because all of the Republicans voted against it. >> >> On 12/11/10, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Tommy, it failed because not all the Dems voted for it. There are not >> > enough Republicans in office until Jan to stop it. The Dems voted >> > against it and that is why it failed. Simple Mathematics!! There are >> > not 41 Republican senators and the Dems still have a majority in the >> > House. The Dems could pass this any time they want. Instead they pack >> > it into an omnibus military spending bill along with the Dream Act and >> > the statue for the Fat Swimmer and then when it fails you try to blame >> > the Republicans for voting against DADT. You keep doing this and it >> > makes no sense at all. You could just as well say that the Dream Act >> > did not pass because of Obstructions or the statue for Fat Teddy did not >> > pass because of Obstructions and it would be just as true. You really >> > have no basis for saying it was all because of DADT at all. Why did >> > your Dems not all fall in line and vote for it. They are the reason it >> > did not pass. It was a Dem bill proposed and pushed by a Dem Majority >> > Leader and he did not get his own troops in line and therefore it >> > failed. You are just trying to shove the blame off on anyone else who >> > might disagree with your POV. Simple Maths!! The Dems did not support >> > this bill enough to pass it. Your Majority Leader screwed up in not >> > lining up enough of his own troops to pass the bill. >> >> > On 12/11/2010 12:39 PM, Tommy News wrote: >> >> Best chance for DADT repeal failed due to the Grand Old Republican >> >> Obstructionists, led by John McCain and John Boehner. >> >> >> On 12/10/10, GregfromBoston<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Best chance failed then, but of course, you just don't knno that. >> >> >>> Drop the court challenge and best chance is 100%. >> >> >>> If republicans block it stand alone, I will join you in your >> >>> opposition. Until then, you're still guessing. >> >> >>> Note well that you aren't claiming dems just voted against UI >> >>> extension. Its piggy backed too. Get it? >> >> >>> On Dec 10, 10:20 am, Tommy News<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> The amaendment was the best chance of getting this bill past the >> >>>> Republican Obstructionists. >> >>>> A Stand alone bill will face even stronger opposition fron John >> >>>> McCain >> >>>> and his homophobic Republican cronies. >> >> >>>> DUH! >> >> >>>> On 12/10/10, GregfromBoston<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>> Still working on this Tom? Its the same piggy back bill. This is >> >>>>> why >> >>>>> Snowe and Lieberman will submit a stand alone bill. Duh! >> >>>>> Using your logic, House dems just voted against extending >> >>>>> unemployment >> >>>>> insurance. Funny you're not mentioning that. >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>>>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> >>>> Have a great day, >> >>>> Tommy >> >>> -- >> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> > -- >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> -- >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> Have a great day, >> Tommy- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
