On Jan 19, 3:53 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Studio, > > your chaotic, painful spin at logic almost defies belief.
No spin to facts. > Can you > point to a single poll that indicates the percentage of Americans that > believe Palin's map had anything to do with Loughner exceeding single > digit? I don't have to. Palin's actions spoke for itself. > Do you think there is anyone, who is not attempting to > fabricate an issue out of this, that actually believes there was a > conceptual difference between cross-hairs and bulls-eyes? You DO know > a bulls-eye is a target, right? A cross-hair is nothing more than > something you place over a bulls-eye. You don't use the word Target to describe a surveyors cross hair. > I have no idea if Palin was involved in the decision to pull the map,.. No of course she has no say in what is put on her Web site... tard excuse alert. You'll never be a great artist, you simply don't know when to stop painting. You would have made the Mona Lisa look like a jumbled mess of squiggly lines. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
