You don't use the word Target to describe a surveyors cross hair. Nor do you use that word to describe a rifle-mans cross hair.
You use the word "target" or the Bullseye symbol to do that. The words are mechanically exclusive. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 19, 3:53 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Studio, > > > > your chaotic, painful spin at logic almost defies belief. > > No spin to facts. > > > Can you > > point to a single poll that indicates the percentage of Americans that > > believe Palin's map had anything to do with Loughner exceeding single > > digit? > > I don't have to. Palin's actions spoke for itself. > > > Do you think there is anyone, who is not attempting to > > fabricate an issue out of this, that actually believes there was a > > conceptual difference between cross-hairs and bulls-eyes? You DO know > > a bulls-eye is a target, right? A cross-hair is nothing more than > > something you place over a bulls-eye. > > You don't use the word Target to describe a surveyors cross hair. > > > I have no idea if Palin was involved in the decision to pull the map,.. > > No of course she has no say in what is put on her Web site... > tard excuse alert. > > You'll never be a great artist, you simply don't know when to stop > painting. > You would have made the Mona Lisa look like a jumbled mess of squiggly > lines. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Mark M. Kahle H. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
