>The "problems" you seem to be alluding to exist BECAUSE of the
> Government's intervention.
I just heard on fox news this morning that the white house just
started a hotline where you could get legal help if u feel victimized
at work. isn't that gov'ts job (govt is paid well to do his job) to
protect people and dispense justice?
Victimized? By these invented 'crimes' or something else?
Government -- LEGITIMATE Government -- secures rights <period>.
My point is that so much love is given to business and an unsucessfull
working man is viewed lowly. That's the opposite of justice. I suggest
that minimum wage be more than it takes to pay the bills, I know at
first that sounds crazy but it also sounds right. ungainful businesses
should be boycoted but outlawing them is also a good idea. There never
would've been a civil war if people refused to buy cotton from slave
owners.
Given?
Minimum wage only ensures that someone MUST be paid at least X.
It does not guarantee employment. In fact, those worth LESS than
X will not be employed.
Talk about a VIOLATION of rights.
- Every citizen who has produced or acquired a product, should have the option of applying it immediately to his own use or of transferring it to whoever on the face of the earth agrees to give him in exchange the object of his desires. To deprive him of this option . . . solely to satisfy the convenience of another citizen, is to legitimize an act of plunder and to violate the law of justice. -- Frédéric Bastiat
by (largely) Southern States. He was elected to implement Clay's American
System (which had been rejected for decades) which would have 'spent' those
dollars (largely) in the Northern States. Liberty lost and the nation was
subsequently enslaved. Slavery was already becoming a loser and would have
gone by the wayside (peacefully) as it had in surrounding Western Hemisphere
areas.
- "But what am I to do in the meantime with
those men at Montgomery [meaning the Confederate constitutional
convention]? Am I to let them go on... [a]nd open Charleston, etc., as
ports of entry, with their ten-percent tariff. What, then, would become
of my tariff?" -Lincoln to Colonel John B. Baldwin, deputized by the
Virginian Commissioners to determine whether Lincoln would use force,
April 4, 1861
guaranteed by the constitution and the Bill of Rights had "proved
inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness."
Roosevelt's remedy was to declare an "economic bill of rights" which
would guarantee:
Employment, with a living wage,
Which is a VIOLATION of rights. The remainder of the socialist wet dream
so contained in that nonsense is as well,
One cannot have a right to what another must provide WITHOUT slavery.
Regard$,
--MJ
[The New Deal gave us a] state-supported economic system
that will continue to devour a little at a time the private
system until it disappears altogether.
-- John T. Flynn, Journalist, 1948
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
