Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is undeserving of being replied to. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist > hodge-podge. > > On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening- > > out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is... > > > " Article IV: > > > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts, > > records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more > > strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the > > states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically > > written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and > > shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws, > > documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written > > concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average > > people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. > > Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages > > in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws > > that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral consensus > > of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first > > year and passed by less than 60% of the House. > > Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and > > immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with > > treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall, > > on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled, > > be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in > > such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude� > > except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been > > duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place > > subject to its jurisdiction. > > The House may create new states if such aren�t within the > > jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by > > joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can > > make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the > > United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the > > USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the > > union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall > > protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or > > the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened), > > the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence." > > � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My > >> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most > >> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The > >> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct > >> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to > >> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the > >> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or > >> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony > >> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is > >> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the > >> presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury > >> has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be > >> the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... *** > >> Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not > >> guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended! > > >> I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said > >> anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others. > >> Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System: > > >> "Article III: > > >> Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and > >> such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to > >> interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its > >> rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt > >> laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New > >> Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never > >> as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor > >> from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of > >> such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal > >> executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new > >> justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on > >> good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President, > >> or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any > >> nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect, > >> high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable > >> nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such > >> shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments, > >> yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall > >> make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never on > >> their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel > >> shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of > >> seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters > >> nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren�t > >> royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently > >> superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered > >> lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress > >> in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not > >> socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the > >> Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend > >> State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not > >> stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be > >> addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not > >> respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or > >> pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall > >> begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: �The justice system is > >> on trial.� All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for > >> one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall > >> not�on their own�reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of > >> gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor > >> process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or > >> respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice > >> to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy. > > >> Section 2& 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the > >> People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption > >> within any arm of government�including the entire judicial system� > >> judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing, > >> favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law > >> enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges, > >> justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful > >> acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to > >> respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government > >> official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be > >> guilty of a felony. The determination of the above status shall be > >> made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a yea vote of 1/3 > >> of the House, a national public trial, televised from the House, shall > >> be held regarding all named parties�with judgment being determined via > >> referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered voters who vote determine > >> that there is guilt, the government officials, judges, justices and/or > >> members of law enforcement shall be removed from their former > >> positions and sentenced commensurate with their crimes, up to and > >> including the death penalty. > >> Judicial authority shall extend to all cases in law and equity > >> arising under this New Constitution, the laws of the United States, > >> treaties made or which shall be made under their authority, to all > >> cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, to > >> all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to controversies in > >> which the United States is a party, to controversies between two or > >> more states, between a state and Citizens of another state, between > >> Citizens of different states, between Citizens of the same state > >> claiming lands under grants of different states or the Citizens > >> thereof, and foreign states, Citizens or subjects. The Supreme Court > >> shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors > >> and consuls, and those in which a state is a party. In all other > >> cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate juris-diction both as to > >> law and to fact�with such exceptions and under such regulations as the > >> House shall make. Except in cases of impeachment, the trial of all > >> crimes shall be by jury in the state where said crimes were allegedly > >> committed, or if otherwise, where the House directs. Misdemeanors and > >> crimes occurring conjunctively shall be tried with the more serious > >> crime, unless the disproving of the misdemeanor would excuse the > >> crime. If either occurred in multiple jurisdictions, the trial shall > >> be at a single common venue that is least compromising to the > >> defense. But capital murder cases may be tried consecutively. > > >> Section 4: New trials shall be granted to anyone previously found > >> guilty if there is substantive new evidence for innocence, or if there > >> was an improper > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
