Jonathan Ashley, the socialist-communist, is undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 11, 5:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > Re: "Unless one understands the hundreds of problems solved, most don't > have the smarts to realize how much more personal liberty and how much > less government control there will be that would otherwise have affected > most Americans." > > John, > > Perhaps a definition of liberty is needed for your perusal. From > Webster's 1828 dictionary: > > *LIB''ERTY,* n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.] > > 1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the > body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not > confined; the will or mind is at liberty, when not checked or > controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to > restrain his actions or volitions. > > How does one gain liberty from YOUR New Constitution? From what little > you have provided, for every problem YOUR New Constitution claims to > solve, YOUR New Constitution creates ten new problems. > > On 03/11/2011 12:46 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Mark: Your pet one-page constitution was unknown to me when I > > wrote my New Constitution�which is based on and expanded from, the > > original. So, don't fault me for not following your lead. At no time > > is the input of any outsider, like you, being sought to... "evaluate" > > what I have done. Most of the content was for solving very specific > > governmental problems highlighted in the news. Unless one understands > > the hundreds of problems solved, most don't have the smarts to realize > > how much more personal liberty and how much less government control > > there will be that would otherwise have affected most Americans. Even > > YOU will be a beneficiary! � J. A. Armistead � > > On Mar 11, 9:34 am, Mark<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public > >> acts, > > >>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more > >>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the > >>>> states having laws governing such. > >> THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR > >> REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES... > > >> English, that is grammatically > > >>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and > >>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws, > >>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written > >>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average > >>>> people, > >> JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT > >> CERTAINLY > >> IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW > >> IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT ANYONE > >> WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT. > > >> or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. > > >>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages > >>>> in civil court. > >> EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE?? > > >> No person shall be punished for violations of laws > > >>>> that: aren�t common knowledge; > >> SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I > >> CAN'T BE PROSECUTED. > > >> disagree with the macro moral consensus > > >>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first > >>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House. > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is > >>> undeserving of being replied to. � J. A. A. � > >>> On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist > >>>> hodge-podge. > >>>> On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>> Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening- > >>>>> out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is... > >>>>> " Article IV: > >>>>> Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts, > >>>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more > >>>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the > >>>>> states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically > >>>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and > >>>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws, > >>>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written > >>>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average > >>>>> people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed. > >>>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages > >>>>> in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws > >>>>> that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral > >>> consensus > >>>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first > >>>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House. > >>>>> Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and > >>>>> immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with > >>>>> treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall, > >>>>> on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled, > >>>>> be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in > >>>>> such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude� > >>>>> except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been > >>>>> duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place > >>>>> subject to its jurisdiction. > >>>>> The House may create new states if such aren�t within the > >>>>> jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by > >>>>> joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can > >>>>> make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the > >>>>> United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the > >>>>> USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the > >>>>> union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall > >>>>> protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or > >>>>> the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened), > >>>>> the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence." > >>>>> � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>> On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My > >>>>>> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most > >>>>>> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The > >>>>>> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct > >>>>>> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to > >>>>>> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the > >>>>>> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or > >>>>>> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony > >>>>>> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is > >>>>>> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the > >>>>>> presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury > >>>>>> has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be > >>>>>> the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... *** > >>>>>> Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not > >>>>>> guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended! > >>>>>> I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said > >>>>>> anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others. > >>>>>> Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System: > >>>>>> "Article III: > >>>>>> Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and > >>>>>> such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to > >>>>>> interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its > >>>>>> rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt > >>>>>> laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New > >>>>>> Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never > >>>>>> as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor > >>>>>> from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of > >>>>>> such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal > >>>>>> executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new > >>>>>> justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on > >>>>>> good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President, > >>>>>> or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any > >>>>>> nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect, > >>>>>> high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable > >>>>>> nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such > >>>>>> shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments, > >>>>>> yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall > >>>>>> make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never on > >>>>>> their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel > >>>>>> shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of > >>>>>> seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters > >>>>>> nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren�t > >>>>>> royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently > >>>>>> superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered > >>>>>> lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress > >>>>>> in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not > >>>>>> socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the > >>>>>> Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
