MJ, the party-crasher, socialist-communist is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 24, 12:40 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > And yet ANOTHER response parading as though a response is somehow undeserving > -- complete with fallacy spew. > Is it any wonder he chooses fallacy and name-calling over the 'defense' of > his nonsense exposed for what it actually is? > Regard$, > -MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It > has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside > and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or > contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual > process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as > a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power > in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 12:08 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:MJ, the > party crasher, is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So, > that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. — > J. A. A. — > > > On Mar 22, 6:47 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending > > it did not occur.ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and communism are the > > anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or > > hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you > > attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get > > lost, Jonathan! J. A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:I am > > personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and > > Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile continuing to "cover" only > > those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of > > getting first rate care. The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps > > the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.There is ALSO this from > > the same person:Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards > > germane to the type and scope of work such perform, and being regularly > > apprised of substantive new developments, may control their own work > > without governmental sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to be > > other than self-trained to maintain continuing competency for doing safe > > work within their chosen type. Professionals qualified by training, testing > > and experience who perform safe and acceptable work within an area of their > > competency shall not be sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job > > class or licensing jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than > > 25% of regulatory board members shall have been employed in the profession > > or industry regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.It should no > > longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR > > that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.<sigh> Sad.As noted, > > were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE examples -- > > one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you refuse to > > present and merey proclaim. > > Regard$, > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. > > It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its > > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and > > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:43 PM > > 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is > > clearly LYING about > > the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference > > a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private > > property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John > > A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You > > > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably > > > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas > > > and I the converse. > > > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see > > > how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a > > > foundation. > > > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private > > > property without outside interference. > > > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy > > > when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately > > > become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me > > > say something like this: "I > > > applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient > > > government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career > > > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good > > > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country! > > > — J. A. Armistead — > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > > > > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000 transactions > > > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for > > > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they are > > > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time. > > > > > > > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce. > > > > > > > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative > > > > > republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties > > > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who > > > > > support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro capitalism > > > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! > > > > > � > > > > > J. A. A. � > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a > > > > >> free > > > > >> sovereign, I do not consent. > > > > > > > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference, > > > > >> 96% > > > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise as > > > > >> it > > > > >> gets. > > > > > > > > >> On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free enterprise. > > > > >>> So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent on > > > > >>> tearing > > > > >>> down this country rather than saving it. He should be railroaded > > > > >>> out > > > > >>> of the USA! � J. A. A. � > > > > >>> On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>> Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again! > > > > >>>> He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw political > > > > >>>> parties. > > > > >>>> He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has "the > > > > >>>> smarts > > > > >>>> and the temperament to be President." > > > > >>>> On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > >>>>> Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace get hot-under-the-collar if a > > > > >>>>> "guest", > > > > >>>>> like Sarah Palin, avoids answering questions that tie her hands on > > > > >>>>> issues that are in flux. Those two Fox jerks suppose that since > > > > >>>>> they > > > > >>>>> are high paid and elitist, that people must do exactly like they > > > > >>>>> say > > > > >>>>> or face ridicule. Within one week after my New Constitution is > > > > >>>>> ratified, the entire Fox News Network will likely be closed down > > > > >>>>> for > > > > >>>>> not being in the best interest of the country. But not to > > > > >>>>> worry! The > > > > >>>>> other News Networks will be shuttered as well. The "problem" is > > > > >>>>> that > > > > >>>>> NEWS, and commentary on that news, cannot occur on the same > > > > >>>>> network. > > > > >>>>> Of course that is only for news relating to elections or > > > > >>>>> "politics". > > > > >>>>> I put that word in quotes, because political parties will be > > > > >>>>> outlawed! Socialism will become a non issue,... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
