MJ, the party crasher, socialist-communist is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > On Mar 26, 1:47 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > Another meaningless fallacy spew from Armistead. A pity. > Post this Constitution of yours so we can all revel in its splendor -- of > course doing so would further expose your failures. > Regard$, > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. > It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring > strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using > political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:10 PM 3/25/2011, you > wrote:MJ, the party-crasher, socialist-communist is bent on destroying, not > saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly > undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. — > > > On Mar 24, 12:40 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > And yet ANOTHER response parading as though a response is somehow > > undeserving -- complete with fallacy spew. > > Is it any wonder he chooses fallacy and name-calling over the 'defense' of > > his nonsense exposed for what it actually is? > > Regard$, > > -MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. > > It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught > > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient > > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the > > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its > > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and > > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 12:08 PM > > 3/24/2011, you wrote:MJ, the party crasher, is bent on destroying, not > > saving the USA. So, > > that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. — > > J. A. A. — > > > > > On Mar 22, 6:47 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while > > > pretending it did not occur.ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and > > > communism are the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a > > > democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and > > > will fire, jail or hang those in government who support socialism and > > > communism. When you attack my New Constitution with your "include me" > > > talk, you are attacking THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties > > > person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J. A. A.And now HERE in THIS > > > thread the same person:I am personally recommending that Social Security, > > > Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile > > > continuing to "cover" only those older or sicker people who have no other > > > means of surviving or of getting first rate care. The implications are > > > rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of > > > socialism.There is ALSO this from the same person:Businesses or > > > professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type and scope of > > > work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive new > > > developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction, > > > nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to > > > maintain continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen > > > type. Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who > > > perform safe and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall > > > not be sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing > > > jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of > > > regulatory board members shall have been employed in the profession or > > > industry regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.It should no > > > longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented > > > NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.<sigh> Sad.As > > > noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE > > > examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you > > > refuse to present and merey proclaim. > > > Regard$, > > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual > > > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has > > > taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at > > > inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to > > > sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the > > > sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means > > > of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas > > > SowellAt 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ: You are a deranged, > > > socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about > > > the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference > > > a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private > > > property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John > > > A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You > > > > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably > > > > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas > > > > and I the converse. > > > > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see > > > > how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a > > > > foundation. > > > > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private > > > > property without outside interference. > > > > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention. > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy > > > > when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately > > > > become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with > > > > me say something like this: "I > > > > applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient > > > > government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career > > > > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good > > > > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country! > > > > — J. A. Armistead — > > > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000 > > > > > transactions > > > > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for > > > > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they > > > > > are > > > > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time. > > > > > > > > > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce. > > > > > > > > > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative > > > > > > republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil > > > > > > liberties > > > > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who > > > > > > support socialism and communism. When you attack my New > > > > > > Constitution > > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro > > > > > > capitalism > > > > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! > > > > > > � > > > > > > J. A. A. � > > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a > > > > > >> free > > > > > >> sovereign, I do not consent. > > > > > > > > > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government > > > > > >> interference, 96% > > > > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise > > > > > >> as it > > > > > >> gets. > > > > > > > > > > >> On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>> Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free enterprise. > > > > > >>> So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent on > > > > > >>> tearing > > > > > >>> down this country rather than saving it. He should be railroaded > > > > > >>> out > > > > > >>> of the USA! � J. A. A. � > > > > > >>> On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>> Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again! > > > > > >>>> He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw political > > > > > >>>> parties. > > > > > >>>> He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has "the > > > > > >>>> smarts > > > > > >>>> and the temperament to be President." > > > >... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
