Nor has anyone else to my knowledge. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jonathan <[email protected]>wrote:
> John, > > To quote you: "MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in sounding negative to > my efforts, as though in concert to defend... socialism and communism." > > You are nothing if not an Ass! I have NEVER defended socialism or communism > in any reply to any post of yours relating to that piece-of-excrement you > call YOUR New Constitution. > > > On 05/02/2011 08:55 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >> Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The >> Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful. >> (Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has monkeys >> in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international peace >> negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of trying >> to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you that >> none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from my >> New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what I >> have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that >> 'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what everyone >> on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would tire of >> reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are first- >> time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New >> Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the adjunct >> block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There are >> many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the lives >> of average Americans better. >> >> It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a fall- >> from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group isn't >> part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am sympathetic to >> the computer storage problems associated with active posts. Several >> months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in >> sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to defend... >> socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, because >> those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding what I >> was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would be >> for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang >> around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied >> below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" tone >> and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a >> Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, if >> Mark interferes again, with THE most important post in the history of >> Political Forum. >> >> — John A. Armistead — Patriot >> >> [The following Email was received from The Annointed (sic) One, >> today.] >> >> Posting your thoughts and ideas is a wonderful thing. It is a JOY to >> read every single posting every single day. >> >> There has been a problem of late, though. The posting of three or four >> original sentences that is followed by several paragraphs that are >> simply cut and paste that can also be found numerous times throughout >> that same thread and other threads as well is not what we do here. >> >> Well,, thats SPAM !!! I have no problem reading the same material once >> or twice but on some threads it is becoming ridiculously >> repetitive..... when that action spreads to other threads and the >> supposed posting either originates or answers in that (or those) >> threads using the same cut and paste diatribe it is against our rules. >> WE DO NOT ACCEPT SPAM from outside sources or from >> members !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> >> So BASTA, GENUG, ENOUGH !!!! In the future said posts will be removed, >> the explanation is here. >> >> On May 1, 8:50 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear J. Ashley: Since as little as one to four sentences are needed >>> to address the crucial issues, there are NO paragraphs in my New >>> Constitution! If there were, the entire document would require fifty >>> plus pages, rather than just ten ledger-size pages to print. In many >>> cases I have "highlighted" the answer to a specific comment by putting >>> *** ... in front of the main point in the reply. The reason I show >>> the entire BLOCK of text (but not a paragraph) is so that people can >>> read larger sections and get a feel for how things are organized. The >>> 160 words you counted probably addressed 10 or more separate issues. >>> In some cases, my adding a single word modifier to an existing >>> sentence allows going in an entire new direction. For example: In the >>> 1st Amendment, I added the word "peaceable" to "freedom of * >>> religion." That is a protection against any religion that advocates >>> or condones violence as a means of fostering its objectives. — J. A. >>> Armistead — >>> >>> On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John, >>>> I accomplished the same outcome with 43 words of clarity that you did >>>> with your convoluted paragraph of more than 160 words. >>>> On 04/24/2011 05:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote: >>>> >>>>> J. Ashley: How quickly YOU forget! The following is from my New >>>>> Constitution: >>>>> "Section 9& 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person, >>>>> news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within >>>>> government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives >>>>> while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can >>>>> make scheduled depositions provided they don�t communicate with the >>>>> representatives otherwise. A representative�s constituents shall be >>>>> allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes >>>>> only while they are in their home states or districts. >>>>> Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or >>>>> return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their >>>>> constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held >>>>> accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The >>>>> solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted >>>>> solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person, >>>>> organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is >>>>> prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as >>>>> above, is a felony�defined as any crime requiring a minimum three >>>>> year >>>>> prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed." � John >>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot >>>>> On Apr 22, 11:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> John, >>>>>> How quick you forget. Do you not remember when you challenged me once >>>>>> before? I posted the following problem and solution: >>>>>> (1) The lobbying of Members of Congress by any Person on behalf >>>>>> of >>>>>> anyone other than themselves shall be prohibited. >>>>>> (2) Any Person found guilty of lobbying under the Prohibitions of >>>>>> this Article shall be imprisoned for not less than 10 Years >>>>>> and/or >>>>>> deported; >>>>>> On 04/21/2011 06:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> J. Ashley: You never did define a single problem with our government >>>>>>> or society, and solve that problem in less than four sentences. I >>>>>>> did >>>>>>> that for fourteen years! Convoluted or not, my New Constitution >>>>>>> solves society's problems! � J. A. A. � >>>>>>> On Apr 21, 12:06 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John, >>>>>>>> How does your reply have anything to do with what I posted? It's no >>>>>>>> wonder YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted. >>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone >>>>>>>>> stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes >>>>>>>>> sense. >>>>>>>>> But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! � J. A. A. � >>>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> John, >>>>>>>>>> 1) Trump has no ideology! >>>>>>>>>> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists. >>>>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If >>>>>>>>>>> Trump >>>>>>>>>>> was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's >>>>>>>>>>> ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for >>>>>>>>>>> your own >>>>>>>>>>> socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> the head. � J. A. A. � >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley< >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *John, >>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a >>>>>>>>>>>> socialist, >>>>>>>>>>>> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. >>>>>>>>>>>> Pay >>>>>>>>>>>> attention!* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp.... >>>>>>>>>>>> .. >>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of >>>>>>>>>>>>> my New >>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> present >>>>>>>>>>>>> post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can Donald Trump �Fix� the Thin Ice that the USA is skating >>>>>>>>>>>>> on? >>>>>>>>>>>>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidacy >>>>>>>>>>>>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For one >>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something�like our broke >>>>>>>>>>>>> economy� >>>>>>>>>>>>> you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall >>>>>>>>>>>>> that a >>>>>>>>>>>>> certain new ice skating rink in New York�s Central Park >>>>>>>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>>>>>>> leaking water and couldn�t be used. That work had been done >>>>>>>>>>>>> by three >>>>>>>>>>>>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the >>>>>>>>>>>>> other. >>>>>>>>>>>>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, >>>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on >>>>>>>>>>>>> that ice >>>>>>>>>>>>> before long. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are >>>>>>>>>>>>> effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a >>>>>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>>>>> �free� free enterprise system, I think of The Donald. He >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been >>>>>>>>>>>>> able to find considerable success working in the morass of >>>>>>>>>>>>> labor >>>>>>>>>>>>> unions and government regulations that are found in NYC. That >>>>>>>>>>>>> man >>>>>>>>>>>>> THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to >>>>>>>>>>>>> get the >>>>>>>>>>>>> job done! Part of the secret is his charisma. But most of it >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word. He makes sure >>>>>>>>>>>>> that all >>>>>>>>>>>>> those involved in a project realize just what their >>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibilities >>>>>>>>>>>>> are, and what they are expected to do if there are any >>>>>>>>>>>>> glitches. In >>>>>>>>>>>>> short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country >>>>>>>>>>>>> of all >>>>>>>>>>>>> time. His executive experience probably exceeds that of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> governors >>>>>>>>>>>>> of most states. Under him people do their jobs and do them >>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of >>>>>>>>>>>>> projects, because it�s an honor just to be associated with >>>>>>>>>>>>> one of his >>>>>>>>>>>>> projects! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative. But he >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn�t >>>>>>>>>>>>> owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be >>>>>>>>>>>>> rivals >>>>>>>>>>>>> do even without realizing that they do. The USA has been >>>>>>>>>>>>> hamstrung >>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time >>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>> �invade� other nations to help the oppressed. The reason >>>>>>>>>>>>> oil fields >>>>>>>>>>>>> get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there� >>>>>>>>>>>>> just for >>>>>>>>>>>>> their oil. By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply >>>>>>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>>>>>> away. The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> will have >>>>>>>>>>>>> enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted >>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those >>>>>>>>>>>>> �poor� >>>>>>>>>>>>> people till they are back on their feet. All of that is being >>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>> like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose >>>>>>>>>>>>> standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> size and the over-control of our government. If The Donald can >>>>>>>>>>>>> get us >>>>>>>>>>>>> trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American >>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxpayers for >>>>>>>>>>>>> our sacrifices, I�ll vote for him! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of >>>>>>>>>>>>> dollars in >>>>>>>>>>>>> �possible� budget cuts that might save this country. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> bad news is >>>>>>>>>>>>> that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the >>>>>>>>>>>>> never- >>>>>>>>>>>>> should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs >>>>>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>>>>>> run by government. After the nearly 15 years that I�ve spent >>>>>>>>>>>>> penning >>>>>>>>>>>>> and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average >>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas >>>>>>>>>>>>> how to fix our government, fast. The following 5 things >>>>>>>>>>>>> aren�t >>>>>>>>>>>>> written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>>> importance: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Privatize >>>>>>>>>>>>> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment >>>>>>>>>>>>> Insurance, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But >>>>>>>>>>>>> unlike >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>> >>> read more » >>> >> > -- > Freedom is always illegal. > > > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's > active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest > breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
