Mark: As I did at the beginning of this post, I will stop replying to you from this point on. I don't have time to argue over your worthless points of view on anything. I will of course continue to reply to those who have a considerate tone, and a genuine interest in understanding what I have done for the good of the American People. Long may an America, that is consistent with the ideals of the Founding Fathers, survive. — John A. Armistead — Patriot — > On May 7, 10:58 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:53 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Moderator Mark: Some of the arguments on other groups have been > > going on for years. > > How nice for them, just how does that apply here?? > > > Not a week goes by that the same explanations are > > made over and over. > > Explanations are just fine, how does that apply to your trolling and > spamming?? > > > Precisely worded material, like my New > > Constitution, cannot be paraphrased. > > *Your tripe has precise words but is definitely NOT precisely worded. * > > > Anyone reading the same thing > > ten times can find something new and important with each reading. > > Not according to you... there is but ONE definition... yours and ANY > disagreement with the worlds premier "Patriot" is received with cries of > "Communist/Socialist" the very things your supposed super document > promotes.....right down to Stalinesque systems of denouncements on the > street. > > > Only a socialist-communist like you, would be offended reading a > > document that will outlaw your kind in the USA. > > See, it proves point above. Absolute Stalinism. > > > So, stay a Tico. > > You say that as though there is a choice. There is not. (Look it up before > thinking or saying something really stupid....AGAIN) > > > The > > cost of living down there is low enough you should be able to survive > > on a moderator's stipend. > > Thanks to the US policy of simply printing more cash (and idiots like you > DOING nothing about it) to pay its bills the Dollar has lost about 20% of it > value outside the US (read in the real world). The US is now just as > affordable for someone from outside. > > And to end this...... Keep *Spamming* the board with something that is > simply an invention (and a poor one at that) of you mind while simply * > trolling* to get your blog search numbers up and I will simply delete the > thread. > > Keep advertising your book(s) in your posts and the thread will disappear. > > *LAST Warning.* > > > > > > > > > — J. A. A. — > > > On May 6, 8:40 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > noeinstein, > > > > Of course I am safe from prosecution...I have not come close to breaking > > any > > > law. It has NOTHING to do with my location. I can also NOT be fired. > > > Periodically copying identical material from identical sources with near > > or > > > identical comments is the very definition of *SPAM. * > > > *** > > > *Your supposed "reason" for spamming is not relevant and is obviously > > more > > > important to you than anyone else. > > > > I could care less if its your "new constitution" or a treatise on > > scratching > > > your ass... spam is spam is spam. > > > > As to people taking umbrage with what YOU and you ALONE alone call an > > > attack... they have pills and psychiatrists for that... this is not the > > > place..maybe a little inpatient care for a while....seek help. > > > > As to the rules governing this Forum.... repeated use of it and TROLLING > > > just to keep the thread alive so it drives search engines to your > > personal > > > blog through keywords is SPAMMING.... > > > > Keep it up and the thread you have been so careful to groom will > > disappear. > > > > As to your unabashed advertising of your "Book".... that too, has been > > > stopped. there is an area supplied on our "pages" section for such tripe. > > > > Play by the rules.... no lobbyists allowed.... no unsolicited ads for > > > personal gain... > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Dear Mark: You may be "safe" from prosecution, but not safe from > > > > being fired. Most of the readers I'm attracting are conservatives in > > > > the USA. Few of those take kindly to your attacking me for > > > > periodically copying parts of my precisely-worded New Constitution. > > > > That document isn't something that can be paraphrased, repeatedly. > > > > I'm sure you would enjoy discussing each little point. But like I've > > > > told J. Ashley, not one word of my document is in flux. — J. A. A. — > > > > > On May 4, 5:11 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear Einstein, > > > > > > I fully comply with "Google, Costa Rica" and WTO rules and in no way > > am I > > > > > subject to ANY part of your governments rules, regulations, or > > > > Constitution. > > > > > Just how ignorant are you that you would think so >?? > > > > > > I could care less that Google is a US Corporation... It is also a > > Costa > > > > > Rican S.A. and those are the rules that cover me and those ONLY. > > Please > > > > read > > > > > OUR constitution. > > > > > > All political points of view are accepted here.... we just do not > > accept > > > > > SPAM regardless of how it is cloaked. > > > > > > Your civil rights are exactly what MY constitution says they are at > > MY > > > > ISP > > > > > address. Welcome to the world!!!!!! > > > > > > If "wringing the neck" continues to be a source of ad nausea SPAM the > > > > thread > > > > > will be shut down and removed. > > > > > > In short, you are on a WORLD forum.... NOT a USA forum..... get used > > to > > > > it. > > > > > > The posters here are not stupid nor are they ignorant. > > > > > Constant repetition is a standard tool of the communist/socialist > > left > > > > and > > > > > you, more than anyone else seem to be perfectly comfortable using > > it.... > > > > I > > > > > wonder why. > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Mark: It's one thing to enjoy reading different points of > > view. > > > > > > It's another one, entirely, to use your unlimited response time to > > > > > > attack, often by TONE, the ideas of others. Though you are in > > Costa > > > > > > Rica, you aren't above having to conform to the Free Speech > > > > > > requirements of the US Constitution. Google is, first and > > foremost, a > > > > > > US corporation. When you violate MY civil rights, Google becomes > > > > > > responsible. Political Forum bragged that all political points of > > > > > > view are accepted. When you cited me for rightfully demanding that > > > > > > Barack Obama be made to account (hang by the neck until dead) for > > his > > > > > > anti-America actions, you sided with the LEFT, > > socialist-communists. > > > > > > You show yourself to have been using your... "moderator" job to > > > > > > promote your personal political objectives. I don't think... > > "that" > > > > > > was part of your job description. I highly recommend that you just > > > > > > fade into the woodwork, like Keith has tended to do. The > > readership > > > > > > of "Wringing-the-neck... " isn't going up because you keep popping > > > > > > in. — J. A. Armistead — > > > > > > > On May 3, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Einstein... here is your latest post.... it did not post when > > > > > > > moderated. I have checked and there are indeed large portions of > > your > > > > > > > former posts missing... our local moderators did NOT do that. If > > you > > > > > > > check though you will find that each section of your constitution > > > > that > > > > > > > was posted is still there at least ONCE. Gee, I warned you > > against > > > > > > > spam... Talk to your buddies at Google...ONLY they can do that, > > and > > > > it > > > > > > > is an auto response accomplished within the servers to save > > space. > > > > > > > > As to my "lowly" "job" here... I enjoy reading different points > > of > > > > > > > view and am not so stupid that I need things CONSTANTLY repeated > > to > > > > > > > me; neither are the other posters. > > > > > > > > Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The > > > > > > > Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful. > > > > > > > (Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has > > monkeys > > > > > > > in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international > > peace > > > > > > > negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of > > trying > > > > > > > to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you > > that > > > > > > > none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from > > my > > > > > > > New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what > > I > > > > > > > have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that > > > > > > > 'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what > > everyone > > > > > > > on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would > > tire > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are > > > > > > > first- > > > > > > > time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New > > > > > > > Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the > > adjunct > > > > > > > block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There > > are > > > > > > > many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the > > lives > > > > > > > of average Americans better. > > > > > > > > It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a > > fall- > > > > > > > from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group > > isn't > > > > > > > part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am > > sympathetic to > > > > > > > the computer storage problems associated with active posts. > > Several > > > > > > > months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith > > popped-in > > > > > > > sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to > > defend... > > > > > > > socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, > > because > > > > > > > those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding > > what I > > > > > > > was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would > > be > > > > > > > for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang > > > > > > > around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied > > > > > > > below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" > > tone > > > > > > > and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a > > > > > > > Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, > > if > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
