On May 10, 11:22 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Jonathan: In any economic system there are good and bad points. > Executive compensation, that has sometimes been at the expense of the > workers cranking out the products, should be based on what is fair, > not just who the supposed leaders of the corporations are. Wal-Mart > started out giving financial incentives to the managers of the stores, > until the wife of the founder insisted that workers would do a better > job, and stay on those jobs longer if there was a profit sharing > plan. A black janitor retired after forty or so years with the > company and had several million dollars in the bank. That sort of > fairness doesn't sound like socialism, now, does it. > > I can't speak for Donald Trump, but in order to get quality labor for > building quality real estate properties—as he knows so well how to do— > the compensation needs to be tops. In the long run, everyone in the > employment hierarchy will benefit when fairness reigns for those at > the bottom or at the top. — John A. Armistead — Patriot. > > On May 10, 11:59 am, Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > John, > > > Repeat after me: Donald Trump is a socialist. From a 2009 interview > > about whether there should be executive pay limits: > > > Larry King: Is Obama right or wrong to go after these executives with > > salary caps? > > > Donald Trump: Well, I think he's absolutely right. Billions of dollars > > is being given to banks and others. You know, once you start using > > taxpayer money, it's a whole new game. So I absolutely think he's right. > > > That's socialism Einstein. > > > On 05/09/2011 11:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Republican presidential contenders are gearing-up to fight-it-out for > > > the right to run against� �Obama� in 2012. Every one of those > > > should > > > be required to answer this question: �Is it FAIR to have hugely > > > expensive primaries spread over months, with the most �power� going to > > > the voters in the corn state of� Iowa? Answer: Hell NO! Nor is it > > > FAIR to allow political parties to have any say-so, whatsoever, > > > regarding who the contenders can be, and how the country will be run > > > once the �winning party� has been decided. > > > > Rep. Ron Paul, that sunken-cheek retread from the 2008 election, has > > > already raised a million dollars�probably earmarked for brown-nosing > > > the farmers of Iowa for a chance to become President. Paul�s early > > > polling lead among the announced candidates has him positioned much as > > > he was four years ago. The same anti-war, less-government crowd who > > > filled his coffers with hard cash, must still be impressed by his > > > unwavering positions on most issues. When Paul withdrew in 2008, he > > > said, �Elections are over quickly. Winning a revolution will take a > > > bit longer.� But instead of leading a revolution, Paul settled back > > > into business as usual in our broken and corrupt, party-dominated > > > government. Anyone so corrupted could never lead this country in the > > > new direction needed. > > > > Judge Andrew Napolitano, filling in for a flagging Glenn Beck, asked a > > > guest this question: �Who among the possible Republican presidential > > > candidates do you think Barack Obama would LEAST like to run > > > against?� The answer to that question isn�t as important as the fact > > > Napolitano is so matter-of-fact that Barack Obama will still be in > > > office, let alone be a candidate for President in 2012. My above > > > average computer graphics experience leads me to conclude that both of > > > Obama�s purported birth certificates are bogus. *** In a very public > > > and straightforward way, the US Secret Service should conduct a > > > definitive investigation of all �birther� issues, lest they continue > > > to �protect� a scoundrel who isn�t a bona fide President of the USA. > > > Napolitano shows his naivet� by recommending we vote for candidates > > > desiring smaller, lower cost Government who will support� the > > > Constitution. Over the decades, the Constitution has been ritually > > > praised. But that document was so WEAK that our government evolved > > > away from being the Representative Republic the Founding Fathers > > > surely wanted to mandate. My New Constitution is strength (control > > > over what goes on in Washington) made manifest! > > > > Donald Trump is being �tagged� a �birther� and a �racist� by > > > Mort > > > Zuckerman�s NY news paper. Liberals call it a conspiracy that anyone > > > would wish to apply the same level of technical facility to analyzing > > > two questionable birth certificates, as was used to assess the Shroud > > > of Turin, or the remains of King Tut. The long form birth > > > certificate, which Obama released to the press, was a *.PDF file, not > > > a photocopy of an original. That file was clearly LAYERS of PDF files > > > placed one over the other to form a composite, counterfeit > > > certificate. Detractors of scientific reason, such as my own and the > > > hundreds of others like me, like to state that �The officials of the > > > State of Hawaii have confirmed that the birth certificate is real.� > > > Great! (Gag, gag.) Objective, concerned Americans are expected to > > > defer to the word of officials in perhaps THE most liberal state in > > > the union. And only one corrupt official would be needed to unbind > > > and stitch-in a bogus certificate. > > > > I found it most interesting that a supposed girlfriend of the daughter > > > of the Dr. Sinclair, who purportedly delivered Obama, recalled, *** > > > after half a century *** a dinner conversation like this: �What > > > interesting things have happened to you this week, Dr.� > > > > �Oh, I gave birth to a kid named Barack Hussein Obama. Isn�t that a > > > pretty name! His mother is named Stanley, like I�m searching in my > > > family genealogy.� > > > > That girlfriend then went on to say that she was �the last surviving > > > person who remembers Obama�s birth.� Yeah, right. And that aunt of > > > Obama who was at his birth in Kenya, must have had a� flawed memory. > > > And wasn�t a Kenya birth certificate shown to be fake? Or� was a fake > > > birth certificate PLANTED to discredit those seeking the truth? > > > > *** Donald Trump is�in my well-considered opinion�the most qualified > > > person to be President. I view his being a government outsider as a > > > 200% advantage, because, as has been the case with Ron Paul, the > > > corruption of the rituals of Washington runs deep for those who�ve > > > been there too long. Trump commented that his running as an > > > independent might actually help Obama by drawing votes from the� > > > Republican candidate. But know this, Mr. Trump: When Obama�s birth > > > certificates and etc. are recognized as being fake, no candidate needs > > > to fear helping Obama win. Political parties are UNCONSTITUTIONAL > > > under the present Constitution. So, all primaries and runoffs should > > > rightfully be held on the dates spelled out in my New Constitution: > > > �The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all the states and territories > > > shall reduce the field of presidential candidates to 8, with the > > > incumbent Pres.& VP to be included in such number, if applicable. > > > The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall reduce the field to four, > > > with the incumbent Pres. and VP not automatically included. The 1st > > > Tuesday in November, each voter selects their 1st& 2nd choices�points > > > 4 and 3 respectively. The President and Vice President Elect receive > > > the highest the 2nd highest total points.� > > > > It�s obvious that few in the media, including at Fox News, want > > > Obama�s birth certificate to be shown to be fake. Glenn Beck calls > > > the �birthers� a conspiracy. And Beck discredits my calling Obama the > > > �Manchurian Candidate,� saying, simply, that isn�t so. With > > > regularity, Beck talks about America needing� �manafacturing� (sic) > > > jobs. And he says� �If they �would have� done that�� rather > > > than > > > saying, correctly, if they HAD done that.� Beck�s regularly making > > > grammatical errors like those, places his IQ at between 90 and 95�too > > > low to understand the figurative meaning in calling Obama the > > > Manchurian Candidate. > > > > Those in the media, such as Britt Hume, Mort Zuckerman and Andrew > > > Napolitano, want to stampede the voters into believing there will be > > > business as usual in government. Nothing would so �shake up� the > > > media and our corrupt two-party government as having overwhelming > > > acceptance that Obama is indeed a FORGER as well as a bribe-giver and > > > taker. He did the latter things in arranging the endorsements of the > > > Clintons, and others, to allow him to become our� Manchurian Candidate > > > President. > > > > The (White) House cleaning that this country so needs, should be the > > > end of business as usual in Washington, and the beginning of our > > > rebirth as a prosperous nation! > > > > Respectfully submitted, > > > > � John A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > AKA NoEinstein on Google�s sci.physics news group. > > > -- > > > Freedom is always illegal! > > > When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we > > declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we > > have any possibility of being free.
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
