MJ: You prove nothing by arguing that another way of characterizing socialism is to claim such interferes with the free use of one's property. I say the same thing: Socialism STEALS from those who actually WORK for a living to give to the good-for-nothings who are unwilling to lift a finger, other than to vote in the most leftist Democrats around. You will never best me at anything, MJ, because you simply don't measure up. — NE —
On May 16, 2:05 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > At 07:36 PM 5/12/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ: When the cost of running our > government(s) starts > approaching the optimum 10% of the GNP, there will be such a huge > What makes 10% GNP 'optimum'?amount of cash available to purchase desired > goods and services, the > many more people should be willing to be charitable. Socialism is > FORCED charity that robs from the rich to give to the lazy and good- > Nonsense. > Socialism is INTERFERING in the free use of one's private property. > Regard$, > --MJAll States are governed by a ruling class that is a minority of the > population, and which subsists as a parasitic and exploitative burden upon > the rest of society. Since its rule is exploitative and parasitic, the State > must purchase the alliance of a group of Court Intellectuals, whose task is > to bamboozle the public into accepting and celebrating the rule of its > particular State. The Court Intellectuals have their work cut out for them. > In exchange for their continuing work of apologetics and bamboozlement, the > Court Intellectuals win their place as junior partners in the power, > prestige, and loot extracted by the State apparatus from the deluded public. > -- Murray Rothbard -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
