Geesh Frank! That made sense! Do you expect a Moonbat to comprehend or understand this? Studio is looking like a deer in the headlights right now!!
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:00 PM, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Studio, > > "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you > paid in either retard." > > Your analogy is seriously flawed. Wealthy or poor, if you drive a car > you have the potential to have an accident and need insurance. > However, if Social Security worked as you propose, then someone > meeting your definition of wealth would have no chance of ever > collecting. So, really, what you're suggesting is that someone who > doesn't drive should still be paying car insurance to help pay for the > insurance of those who do. > > On May 19, 10:44 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 19, 12:00 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Then why take it from the rich. Why should they pay what you are > > > insuring they cannot receive back. > > > > You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you > > paid in either retard. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
