Then why take it from the rich. Why should they pay what you are
insuring they cannot receive back.
How do you get assets without having a bank balance. Do you think
people just hand you money for the fun of it? Unless you are one of the
no-goodniks who live for and on welfare? People get handed money (or
other assets) for a reason and that reason is based on their net worth
at the time. Their net worth at the time is in turn what their cash
balance was at an earlier time. See what I mean about how the stupid
Dems can't follow one thought to another? You are looking at one point
in time and calculating assets. I am looking at how those assets were
accrued and why. Big difference and obviously you have no clue about
how these things happen.
On 05/18/2011 10:28 PM, studio wrote:
On May 18, 10:01 pm, dick thompson<[email protected]> wrote:
Fool. Without the bank balance they would not have the assets at
the time they qualify for SSA payments.
Assets are not just bank balance tard.
If people can figure out how many billions billionaires are worth,
they can certainly figure out how much the average joe is worth.
Social Security is an insurance for the poor, not an entitlement for
the rich.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
