Here are a few quotes from Crazy Uncle Ron: On Black Americans:
*"If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be." - Ron Paul, 1992* ** "I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. " http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007/06/my_latest_column_the_conservat.php http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/aol-metropolitan/96/05/23/paul.html *"Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began."* http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/152192/5_reasons_progressives_should_treat_ron_paul_with_extreme_caution_--_'cuddly'_libertarian_has_some_very_dark_politics?page=2 ** *"AIDS sufferers enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick."* ** http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter Crazy Uncle Ron on the 9/11 "Truther" Movement: *CALLER:* I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001. I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please? *HON. DR. RON PAUL:* *Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as **more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.* http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/ Crazy Uncle Ron on the purported "North American Union" (which we all now know was much ado, about nothing, yet Ron Paul continued to bolster the crazy conspiracy theory) *According to the US government website dedicated to the project, the SPP is neither a treaty nor a formal agreement. Rather, it is a "dialogue" launched by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco, Texas in March, 2005. What is a "dialogue"? We don't know. What we do know, however, is that Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent. Congress has had no role at all in a "dialogue" that many see as a plan for a **North American union**.* Note: The quote is from fellow Crackpot Lou Rockwell's and his Jewish cohort, Murry Rothbard's web site: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul341.html ** *Dr. Paul published two newsletters: The Ron Paul Political Report and the Ron Paul Survival Report. I have linked PDFs of images from those actual newsletters from the 1980s and 1990s. In the letters, Paul accuses US troops of war crimes in Deser...**t Storm, accuses US troops of war crimes in Somalia, implied Pres. Reagan was closely tied to communist Armand Hammer in some sinister conspiracy, maintained that the US and Great Britain should not have gotten involved in the effort against Nazi Germany, accused Sen. Jesse Helms of essentially taking bribes to support Israel, and launched a tirade against Rep. Jack Kemp and Sen. Bob Dole for authoring legislation to close a PLO office in Wash DC (the PLO was a terrorist organization)... *http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc289/LSUfanFR/?mediafilter=images > *"Right now it’s an anybody-but-Romney primary. If Ron Paul wins Iowa, it > will become anybody-but-Ron Paul going forward."* > > *"Ron is accusing the speaker of being a hypocrite, I mean that’s how he > ends this last ad. Well look, when I was in Congress with Ron, he used to > put in, he would put in hundreds of millions of dollars of appropriations > requests, earmarks. And then he would sit on the floor and he would wait > until the vote was certain that his earmarks would be funded and then he > would put his card in the slot and vote No. So that he could then say with > purity, 'I don’t vote for earmarks.'"* > > *"He doesn’t complete the deal. He'd vote against his own earmarks, > knowing that they were going to pass, so he could then have his cake and > eat it too. And you know what, I don’t think that that's a totally honest > way of dealing with your fellow colleagues on that. If you truly are > against the earmarks, then you don't put them in and you don’t request > them." In a way, he was for the earmarks but he was against the earmarks, > if you know what I mean. I think that is kind of a hypocritical position to > take. So I think people ought to be a little careful when they live in > glass houses on this."* > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
