a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for freedom, prosperity and non- interventionism ... regardless of how his supporters make you feel
I find your partisanship toward a conservative republican interesting. I suspect that you have financial incentives to want a continued invasion on the middle east. On Dec 22, 12:17 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Good Afernoon PlainOl; > > As I pointed out above: > > *Fact: A lot of Ron Paul's supporters are incredibly irritating: *There > are, without question, plenty of decent folks who support Ron Paul. > However, for whatever reason, his supporters as a group are far more > annoying than those of all the other candidates put together. It's like > every spammers, truther, troll, and flake on the net got together under one > banner to spam polls and try to annoy everyone into voting for Ron Paul > (which is, I must admit, a novel strategy). > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, plainolamerican > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the Ron Paul promotion material and more proof that > > imperialist interventionists in the GOP will vote for somebody other > > than a conservative republican. > > > On Dec 22, 11:05 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Some very astute observations by Former Iowa Congressman Greg Ganske > > > on crazy Uncle Ron: > > > > *"Right now it’s an anybody-but-Romney primary. If Ron Paul wins Iowa, it > > > will become anybody-but-Ron Paul going forward."* > > > > *"Ron is accusing the speaker of being a hypocrite, I mean that’s how he > > > ends this last ad. Well look, when I was in Congress with Ron, he used to > > > put in, he would put in hundreds of millions of dollars of appropriations > > > requests, earmarks. And then he would sit on the floor and he would wait > > > until the vote was certain that his earmarks would be funded and then he > > > would put his card in the slot and vote No. So that he could then say > > with > > > purity, 'I don’t vote for earmarks.'"* > > > > *"He doesn’t complete the deal. He'd vote against his own earmarks, > > knowing > > > that they were going to pass, so he could then have his cake and eat it > > > too. And you know what, I don’t think that that's a totally honest way of > > > dealing with your fellow colleagues on that. If you truly are against the > > > earmarks, then you don't put them in and you don’t request them." In a > > way, > > > he was for the earmarks but he was against the earmarks, if you know > > what I > > > mean. I think that is kind of a hypocritical position to take. So I think > > > people ought to be a little careful when they live in glass houses on > > this." > > > * > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
