some 33 percent of chaplains are now evangelical Christians
---
and 100 percent of USSC justices are jews and catholics.

tit for tat among the myth believers who have forgotten that the USA
is a secular nation

On Jun 19, 3:11 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> A Biblical Threat to National SecuritybyKelley B. Vlahos, June 19, 2012
> Can a Bible be a “threat to national security”?
> For years, the government has employed the risk of “national security” excuse 
> to infringe on a wide range of freedoms like the right to pass through an 
> airport security checkpoint unmolested, or read library books without Big 
> Brother peeking over your shoulder.Michael L. “Mikey” Weinsteinis trying to 
> prove that there is more than one way to put the country at risk, and he’s 
> found it in a heretofore unlikely place: the Bible.
> Well, the Holman Bible. To be more exact, a version of the Bible that, for 
> reasons still undetermined, was authorized with the trademarked official 
> insignia of the U.S. Armed Forces emblazoned on the front cover. There isThe 
> Soldier’s Biblewith the Army’s seal,The Marine’s Biblewith the Marine Corps 
> seal,The Sailor’s BibleandThe Airman’s Bible, both with their respective 
> insignia. The books have been sold for nearly six years throughout Christian 
> bookstores, commissaries and PXs on U.S. military installations and are still 
> available on Christianbook.com,Amazon.comand Barnes & Noble.
> It’s not theKing James Versionthatthe Gideonsleave behind in hotel rooms 
> drawers. The Holman Bible was commissioned and published by LifeWay Christian 
> Resources, a subsidiary of theSouthern Baptist Convention, the largest 
> Baptist denomination in the world, in 2003.
> In a 1999press releaseannouncing the edition’s progress, Broadman & Holman 
> Publishers called the new version “a fresh, precise translation of the 
> Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek of the Old and New Testaments.” LifeWay President 
> James T. Draper Jr. weighed in, saying there was a “serious need for a 
> 21st-century Bible translation in American English that combines accuracy and 
> readability,” adding, “the Holman Christian Standard Bible is an accurate, 
> literal rendering with a smoothness and readability that invites 
> memorization, reading aloud and dedicated study.”
> The Holman Bible, or HCSB, has been popular with evangelicals for its 
> references and study tools. Someone convinced each branch of the service 
> they’d be perfect for the military, too. So the HCSB became the “official” 
> Bible of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines in 2004, complete with 
> reader-friendly text and custom “designed to meet the specific needs of those 
> who serve in the most difficult of situations,” according to the publishers.
> In other words, aside from the text, the books are filled with “devotionals” 
> and “inspirational essays” tailored to each branch of service. I was unable 
> to get my hands on a copy by press time, but Amazon’s “peek” inside the book 
> and several positive reader reviews confirm some of the contents, revealing 
> what could only be described as a guileless conflation of both Christian and 
> American military iconography. War and service as religious devotion.
> In addition to the Pledge of Allegiance and the first and fourth verses of 
> the Star Spangled Banner, there are excerpts from one of George W. Bush 
> inaugural addresses and the Republican president’s remarks at a National 
> Prayer Breakfast.Gen. George S. Patton’s famous Christmas prayer cardfrom the 
> field of battle 1944 is also included, as is“George Washington’s 
> Prayer,”which has been widely circulated (and debunked) as proof of America’s 
> Christian paternity.
> These Bibles also feature “testimonials and encouragement from theOfficers’ 
> Christian Fellowship,” which has approximately 15,000 members across the 
> military and whose primary purpose is “to glorify God by uniting Christian 
> officers for biblical fellowship and outreach, equipping and encouraging them 
> to minister effectively in the military society.” In other words they 
> proselytize within the officer corps as part of an evangelical “parachurch” 
> within the military.
> A largely unfettered one, apparently, as one watches Pentagon officers 
> commenting freely on camera and in uniform for this Bush-era 
> promotionalvideofor Christian Embassy, another federal government-wide 
> “fellowship” with similar missionary goals.
> One officer, Air Force Maj. Gen. Jack Catton, who said he worked on the Joint 
> Staff at the Pentagon, described himself as “an old fashioned American and my 
> first priority is my faith in God.” Pointing to his meeting with other 
> officers under the auspices of Christian Embassy, he said, “I think it’s a 
> huge impact because you have many men and women who are seeking God’s counsel 
> and wisdom as we advise the Secretary of Defense.”
> Then U.S. Brigadier Gen. Bob Caslan (currently promoted to lieutenant general 
> as the commanding general at the U.S. Army’s prestigious Combined Arms Center 
> at Ft. Leavenworth, Kan.) went so far as to say he sees the “flag officer 
> fellowship groups … hold me accountable.”
> “We are the aroma of Jesus Christ,” he added.
> Something smells, all right, said Weinstein, who heads theMilitary Religious 
> Freedom Foundation (MRFF). The roles of the officers in the video werelater 
> deemed improperafter MRFF demanded an investigation in 2007. As for the 
> Bibles, Weinstein said he received some 2,000 complaints about them from 
> service members over the last year. Weinstein, a former Air Force Judge 
> Advocate (JAG) whose 2005 charges against the Air Force Academy in Colorado 
> led to an investigation thatofficially found religious “insensitivity”against 
> non- fundamentalists there, has gone on to expose a much wider climate 
> of“top-down, invasive evangelicalism”at the institution and throughout the 
> military as a whole.
> “We’re fighting a 
> Fundamentalist-Christian-Parachurch-Military-Corporate-Proselytizing-Complex,”
>  Weinstein said told Antiwar.com last week, “and we have been fighting this 
> for some time.” MRFF just posted a video montage, which could easily be 
> called the military evangelicals’ greatest hits,here.
> He said aside from “prostituting” the military insignia, the military’s 
> endorsement of the Bibles violated federal separation of church and state, 
> and continue to sanction an insidious culture of radical evangelicalism and 
> discrimination throughout the services (as a Jew, Weinstein said he felt the 
> sting of prejudice when he attended the Air Force academy in the late 1970s; 
> his sons had it even worse, he claims, prompting his first formal complaint 
> seven years ago).
> Since then, “(MRFF) has had 28,000 clients and a hundred more each month,” 
> said Weinstein, rejecting claims by his critics that they are all atheist. He 
> insists that 96 percent of his clients are Christians (Catholic and Mainline 
> Protestant) and that his is not a religious crusade. On the other hand,some 
> 33 percent of chaplains are now evangelical Christians(Weinstein’s MRFF 
> places that number at 84 percent), while only 3 percent of service members 
> describe themselves as such.
> “They are spiritually raping the U.S. Constitution, the American people and 
> the men and women who are fighting for us,” said Weinstein, who never, ever 
> minces words.
> MRFF’s lawyers senta formal letterto Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s 
> office in January. In it, MRFF charged that authorizing LifeWay to print its 
> Bibles with the service insignia “is in violation of the Establishment Clause 
> of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution … and several 
> regulations,” and that the authority should be withdrawn immediately or face 
> legal action from MRFF.
> Interestingly, according to thedocuments now available online, the Army, Navy 
> and Air Force responded to the letter in February, insisting that the summer 
> before Weinstein’s lawyers at Jones Day contacted the Pentagon, they had 
> already pulled their trademark authorizations to LifeWay, for “unrelated 
> reasons.” So, in effect, according to the military, the Southern Baptist 
> Convention subsidiary no longer had use of the trademarks and the question 
> was moot.
> Weinstein responded with one word: “lies.” He told Antiwar.com that they were 
> just informed of the letters in June, not in February. Furthermore,according 
> to MRFF senior research director Chris Rodda, MRFF has obtained documents 
> through Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests that indicated the “AAFES (the 
> Army and Air Force Exchange Service, which runs the BXs, PXs, and other 
> stores on military bases) was clearly concerned about the complaints about 
> the Holman Bibles, with emails as early as June 6, 2011 from AAFES to LifeWay 
> saying that these Bibles had ‘become a hot issue,’ and referencing and 
> linking to a June 2, 2011 article on MRFF’s website as the reason they were 
> becoming a hot issue.”
> Nevertheless, according to aFox News Radio story, LifeWay insists it’s “sold” 
> all existing copies of the military Bible in question, and instead is 
> printing the same Bibles with “generic insignias, which continue to sell well 
> and provide spiritual guidance and comfort to those who serve.”
> The AAFES told Fox News Radio it has 961 copies of the Bible left on shelves 
> at 83 facilities. Weinstein doesn’t know how many are out there but contends 
> that until each and every one is gone, “they’re still aiding and abetting the 
> cause of al- Qaeda.”
> Why? Because it is a national security issue if America is perceived as 
> waging a religious war against the Muslim world. One can’t help but get that 
> impression reading the added material in these Holman Bibles, suggesting that 
> that God has blessed the American warrior for his existential struggle of 
> good versus evil.
> A crusade and one playing right into the religious extremism on the other 
> side, putting Americans overseas, and at home, at risk, said Weinstein.
> His approach which is as fiery and combative as the preachers he rebukes 
> (he’s taken to calling the Pentagon, “Pentacostal-gon,”) has drawn fire from 
> a number of conservative Christian organizations and websites, which have 
> labeled MRFF a bunch of zealous atheist agitators.
> “Why should these Bibles be removed because of the demands of a small 
> activist group?” Ron Crews, head ofThe Chaplain Alliance for Religious 
> Liberty, asked last week, adding in an interview with Fox News Radio that the 
> Department of Defense was acting “cowardly” by backing down to MRFF.
> “MRFF must cease and desist their reckless assault on religious liberty. The 
> Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty calls on Congress to investigate this 
> frivolous threat and apparent discrimination against religious views by the 
> DoD.”
> But this “reckless assault” has offered the public a window into how much 
> evangelicalism threads through the military ethos today from the Pentagon 
> buying gunswith sights outfitted with biblical references, to born-again 
> chaplainsdirecting soldiers to hand out Bibles and proselytizeamong the 
> Muslim locals in Afghanistan.
> MRFF has accused Army chaplains ofusing religion in lieu of mental health 
> counseling to aid battlefield stress, and drew attention toprovocative 
> displaysof religious murals and crosses sprawled on walls at U.S. bases and 
> on vehicles driven through the urban battlefront. MRFF has protested the 
> taxpayer-funded “Spiritual Fitness Concert Series” performed on bases here in 
> the states, and followed up on complaints by service members at Fort Eustis 
> in Virginia who said they werepunished by a superior officer for not 
> attending. MRFF also helped put the brakes on an Air Force training program 
> in 2011 that used the New Testament and the insights of an ex-Nazito teach 
> missile officers about the morals and ethics of launching nuclear weapons.
> More recently, MRFFcriticized a fighter squadron’s decisionto switch back to 
> its old “Crusader” moniker, complete with a Knights Templar red cross 
> emblazoned on its planes. Under pressure, the Marines have since reversed 
> that decision, returning to its old World War II-era “werewolves” 
> nickname,earlier this month.
> Weinstein said “predatory” evangelicals in the military “believe the 
> Separation of Church and State is a myth, like Bigfoot and the Loch Ness 
> Monster,” and he doesn’t mind putting his own reputation and safety on the 
> line to smash that myth to pieces.
> “If we’re catching them on things like this Bible, what the hell else is 
> going on? Well, we know,” he said. “The Bible situation is not innocent, it 
> is not innocuous, it is another raging example of this cancer.”

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to