She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable --- maybe as a republican candidate ... but America will not elect her because she's not qualified.
On Nov 19, 8:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Arhata Osho* > Date: Monday, November 19, 2012 > Subject: [LDA] She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable. > > I agree with a large part of this commentary. Males, while showing how > dumb they are to vote for a Mormon, will slobber to the voting booth for > Sarah. The Dem's need a well balanced woman, and she doesn't have to be as > young and sexy. Elizabeth Warren or Jill Stein will due, or....? > The economy will likely only be better in some areas, but it will be a BIG > issue. Sarah will look good - sorry if you can't see that > November 18, 2012 > She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable. > <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php> > > I kid you not and this article was published by the LA TIMES, Not only that > but if you go to the site they are holding a poll on *Sarah Palin for > president in 2016?* and the vote as of this posting is 76% in favour and > 23% against. You should also read the comments while visiting. Ted Belman > > *Hey GOP, take the Palin > cure*<http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-allen-palin-for-...> > > By Charlotte Allen, LA TIMES > November 18, 2012 > > <http://www.israpundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/palin20.jpg> > > In 2008, Palin, running as my party’s vice presidential candidate, was > widely supposed to have cost John > McCain<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/elections/u.s.-elections/john-m...>the > election. But that wasn’t so. A national exit poll conducted by CNN asked > voters whether Palin was a factor in their voting. Of those who said yes, > 56% voted for McCain versus 43% for Barack > Obama<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/barack-obama-PEPLT00...> > . > > Furthermore, Mitt > Romney<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/mitt-romney-PEPLT007...>, > the GOP’s anointed contender this year, got almost a million fewer votes > than McCain did in 2008. (Meanwhile, President Obama, although winning > reelection, lost far more voters than the Republicans, with nearly 7 > million fewer voters checking his name on their ballots than did in 2008). > > Millions of Americans didn’t much care for Obama and his > Obamacare<http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/healthcare-laws/patient-protectio...> > spending > blowout, but they didn’t feel like voting for Romney either. Some said that > Romney didn’t resonate with recession-hit blue-collar folks in swing states > because he “looked like the boss who outsourced their jobs,” as one blog > commenter quipped. > > Gabriel Malor, writing for the New York Daily News’ blog, pinpointed > another reason: By focusing his campaign mostly on serious economic and > political issues such as the national debt and tax incentives, Romney > failed to take into account the fact that large segments of the electorate > neither know nor care much about serious economic and political issues. > What they — a group sometimes euphemistically called “uninformed voters” — > do know and care about are the tugs on their emotions, fears, revulsions > and heart strings provided by hours and hours of uninterrupted television > watching . > > The > Democrats<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/democratic-pa...> > understood > how to reach that constituency. When a barrage of Obama campaign TV ads > told them that the GOP wanted to take away their > contraceptives<http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/birth-control-HETHT000011.topic> > or > thatBain > Capital<http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/financial-busin...> > killed > someone’s wife, they took notice. When Obama strolled the > hurricane-stricken beaches of New Jersey in his bomber jacket, they were > snowed. As Malor put it, Obama won on “binders, Big Bird, birth control and > blameBush<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/presidents-of-the-un...> > .” > > Palin can more than keep up with the Democrats in appealing to voters’ > emotions. Hardly anyone could be more blue collar than Palin, out on the > fishing boat with her hunky blue-collar husband, Todd. Palin is > “View”-ready, she’s “Ellen”-ready, she’s Kelly-and-Michael-ready. > > A Palin “war against women”? Hah! Not only is she a woman, she’s got a > single-mom daughter, Bristol, to help with the swelling single-mom > demographic. On social issues, Palin, unlike Romney, has been absolutely > consistent. And let’s remember that most Americans, whatever their view of > choice, disapprove of most abortions. > > Gay marriage? Palin opposes it. But she is also a strong advocate of > states’ rights, and I’m betting she’d be fine with letting states and their > voters grapple with the issue on their own. Remember that all of America > didn’t swing toward approval of gay marriage on Nov. 6. Three reliably blue > states and their voters did. If she were smart, Palin would recruit a > member of her impressive gay fanboy base — yes, she has one — to help run > her campaign. I nominate Kevin DuJan of the widely read gay conservative > blog HillBuzz, a Palin stalwart since 2008. > > Palin’s son Track is an Iraq > war<http://www.latimes.com/topic/unrest-conflicts-war/wars-interventions/...> > veteran, > so she can be proudly patriotic without being labeled another George W. > Bush, looking to do aggressive nation-building. She seems aware there is > only one nation in need of building right now: America. > > Furthermore, looks count in politics, and Palin at age 48, has it all over > her possible competition, including Hillary Rodham > Clinton<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/hillary-clinton-PEPL...>, > who will be 69 by election day 2016 and who let someone talk her into > adopting the flowing blond locks of a college student, making her look like > Brunnhilde in a small-town Wagner production. Men love Sarah Palin, and she > loves men. > > She’s tough as nails too. After Election 2008, she was supposed to have > been through. This year eight of the 14 GOP candidates Palin endorsed for > Congress won election or reelection, including tea > party<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/tea-party-movement-ORCIG000068....> > favorite > Ted Cruz for a Senate seat in Texas. > > Sure, there is going to be never-ending nastiness from the left, but she’s > already lived through that once. Katie > Couric<http://www.latimes.com/topic/arts-culture/mass-media/katie-couric-PEC...>? > A has-been. Tina > Fey<http://www.latimes.com/topic/entertainment/tina-fey-PECLB001672.topic>? > Her shtick was already wearing thin in 2008. > > There are also the snooty East Coast Republican intellectual types, such as > Peggy Noonan, who look down their noses at a woman who doesn’t shop at Neiman > Marcus<http://www.latimes.com/topic/services-shopping/clothing-accessories-s...> > and > didn’t attend an Ivy League university. But Peggy made a fool of herself > calling the election for Romney on Nov. 5. Who’s going to care what she and > her ilk have to say next time? > > Some Republicans will say Palin has too much baggage from 2008, and we need > to look for a new Sarah Palin. But I don’t see what’s wrong with the one > we’ve got. Ever since the 1990s, Republicans have been looking for the > next Ronald > Reagan<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/presidents-of-the-un...>. > Reagan is now revered in bipartisan circles, but during his presidency he > was, like Palin, ridiculed by liberals. They cited “Bedtime for Bonzo” and > sneered at his no-name college degree. > > Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan: charming and affable and unwilling to > back down if she’s right. I can’t see what’s wrong with that. > > *Charlotte Allen writes frequently about feminism, politics and religion.* > Posted by Ted Belman @ 1:56 pm *|* 15 Comments > »<http://www.israpundit.com/archives/50788#comments> > > Arhata > > arhataosho.com > > __._,_.___ > Reply via web > post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...> > Reply > to sender <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dRe%3A%20She%E2%80%99s%20hot%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20bl > ue%20collar%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20electable%2E');> > Reply > to group <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dRe%3A%20She%E2%80%99s%20hot%2C%20she%E2%80%99s% > 20blue%20collar%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20electable%2E');> > Start > a New > Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...> > Messages > in this > topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/message/99606;_yl...>(1) > Recent Activity: > > - New > Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/members;_ylc=X3oD...> > 1 > > Visit Your > Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMTRr...> > > Have a great peaceful DAY! > [image: Yahoo! > Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkOW0ycWg5BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...> > Switch to: Text-Only <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional');>, > Daily Digest <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest');>• > Unsubscribe <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dUnsubscribe');>• > Terms > of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> • Send us Feedback > <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', > '[email protected]?subject\x3dFeedback+on+the+redesigned+individual+mail+v1') > ;> > . > > __,_._,___ -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
