not much difference ... one's just slightly more openly zionist than the other.
On Nov 19, 8:45 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > Unlike Obama? > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 19, 2012, plainolamerican wrote: > > She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable > > --- > > maybe as a republican candidate ... but America will not elect her > > because she's not qualified. > > > On Nov 19, 8:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: *Arhata Osho* > > > Date: Monday, November 19, 2012 > > > Subject: [LDA] She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable. > > > > I agree with a large part of this commentary. Males, while showing how > > > dumb they are to vote for a Mormon, will slobber to the voting booth for > > > Sarah. The Dem's need a well balanced woman, and she doesn't have to be > > as > > > young and sexy. Elizabeth Warren or Jill Stein will due, or....? > > > The economy will likely only be better in some areas, but it will be a > > BIG > > > issue. Sarah will look good - sorry if you can't see that > > > November 18, 2012 > > > She’s hot, she’s blue collar, she’s electable. > > > <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php> > > > > I kid you not and this article was published by the LA TIMES, Not only > > that > > > but if you go to the site they are holding a poll on *Sarah Palin for > > > president in 2016?* and the vote as of this posting is 76% in favour and > > > 23% against. You should also read the comments while visiting. Ted Belman > > > > *Hey GOP, take the Palin > > > cure*< > >http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-allen-palin-for-...> > > > > By Charlotte Allen, LA TIMES > > > November 18, 2012 > > > > <http://www.israpundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/palin20.jpg> > > > > In 2008, Palin, running as my party’s vice presidential candidate, was > > > widely supposed to have cost John > > > McCain< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/elections/u.s.-elections/john-m.. > > .>the > > > election. But that wasn’t so. A national exit poll conducted by CNN asked > > > voters whether Palin was a factor in their voting. Of those who said yes, > > > 56% voted for McCain versus 43% for Barack > > > Obama< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/barack-obama-PEPLT00...> > > > . > > > > Furthermore, Mitt > > > Romney< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/mitt-romney-PEPLT007...>, > > > the GOP’s anointed contender this year, got almost a million fewer votes > > > than McCain did in 2008. (Meanwhile, President Obama, although winning > > > reelection, lost far more voters than the Republicans, with nearly 7 > > > million fewer voters checking his name on their ballots than did in > > 2008). > > > > Millions of Americans didn’t much care for Obama and his > > > Obamacare< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/healthcare-laws/patient-protectio...> > > > spending > > > blowout, but they didn’t feel like voting for Romney either. Some said > > that > > > Romney didn’t resonate with recession-hit blue-collar folks in swing > > states > > > because he “looked like the boss who outsourced their jobs,” as one blog > > > commenter quipped. > > > > Gabriel Malor, writing for the New York Daily News’ blog, pinpointed > > > another reason: By focusing his campaign mostly on serious economic and > > > political issues such as the national debt and tax incentives, Romney > > > failed to take into account the fact that large segments of the > > electorate > > > neither know nor care much about serious economic and political issues. > > > What they — a group sometimes euphemistically called “uninformed voters” > > — > > > do know and care about are the tugs on their emotions, fears, revulsions > > > and heart strings provided by hours and hours of uninterrupted television > > > watching . > > > > The Democrats< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/democratic-pa...> > > > understood > > > how to reach that constituency. When a barrage of Obama campaign TV ads > > > told them that the GOP wanted to take away their > > > contraceptives< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/birth-control-HETHT000011.topic> > > > or > > > thatBain Capital< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/financial-busin...> > > > killed > > > someone’s wife, they took notice. When Obama strolled the > > > hurricane-stricken beaches of New Jersey in his bomber jacket, they were > > > snowed. As Malor put it, Obama won on “binders, Big Bird, birth control > > and > > > blameBush< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/presidents-of-the-un...> > > > .” > > > > Palin can more than keep up with the Democrats in appealing to voters’ > > > emotions. Hardly anyone could be more blue collar than Palin, out on the > > > fishing boat with her hunky blue-collar husband, Todd. Palin is > > > “View”-ready, she’s “Ellen”-ready, she’s Kelly-and-Michael-ready. > > > > A Palin “war against women”? Hah! Not only is she a woman, she’s got a > > > single-mom daughter, Bristol, to help with the swelling single-mom > > > demographic. On social issues, Palin, unlike Romney, has been absolutely > > > consistent. And let’s remember that most Americans, whatever their view > > of > > > choice, disapprove of most abortions. > > > > Gay marriage? Palin opposes it. But she is also a strong advocate of > > > states’ rights, and I’m betting she’d be fine with letting states and > > their > > > voters grapple with the issue on their own. Remember that all of America > > > didn’t swing toward approval of gay marriage on Nov. 6. Three reliably > > blue > > > states and their voters did. If she were smart, Palin would recruit a > > > member of her impressive gay fanboy base — yes, she has one — to help run > > > her campaign. I nominate Kevin DuJan of the widely read gay conservative > > > blog HillBuzz, a Palin stalwart since 2008. > > > > Palin’s son Track is an Iraq > > > war< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/unrest-conflicts-war/wars-interventions/...> > > > veteran, > > > so she can be proudly patriotic without being labeled another George W. > > > Bush, looking to do aggressive nation-building. She seems aware there is > > > only one nation in need of building right now: America. > > > > Furthermore, looks count in politics, and Palin at age 48, has it all > > over > > > her possible competition, including Hillary Rodham > > > Clinton< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/hillary-clinton-PEPL...>, > > > who will be 69 by election day 2016 and who let someone talk her into > > > adopting the flowing blond locks of a college student, making her look > > like > > > Brunnhilde in a small-town Wagner production. Men love Sarah Palin, and > > she > > > loves men. > > > > She’s tough as nails too. After Election 2008, she was supposed to have > > > been through. This year eight of the 14 GOP candidates Palin endorsed for > > > Congress won election or reelection, including tea > > > party< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/tea-party-movement-ORCIG000068....> > > > favorite > > > Ted Cruz for a Senate seat in Texas. > > > > Sure, there is going to be never-ending nastiness from the left, but > > she’s > > > already lived through that once. Katie > > > Couric< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/arts-culture/mass-media/katie-couric-PEC...>? > > > A has-been. Tina > > > Fey< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/entertainment/tina-fey-PECLB001672.topic>? > > > Her shtick was already wearing thin in 2008. > > > > There are also the snooty East Coast Republican intellectual types, such > > as > > > Peggy Noonan, who look down their noses at a woman who doesn’t shop at > > Neiman > > > Marcus< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/services-shopping/clothing-accessories-s...> > > > and > > > didn’t attend an Ivy League university. But Peggy made a fool of herself > > > calling the election for Romney on Nov. 5. Who’s going to care what she > > and > > > her ilk have to say next time? > > > > Some Republicans will say Palin has too much baggage from 2008, and we > > need > > > to look for a new Sarah Palin. But I don’t see what’s wrong with the one > > > we’ve got. Ever since the 1990s, Republicans have been looking for the > > > next Ronald > > > Reagan< > >http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/presidents-of-the-un...>. > > > Reagan is now revered in bipartisan circles, but during his presidency he > > > was, like Palin, ridiculed by liberals. They cited “Bedtime for Bonzo” > > and > > > sneered at his no-name college degree. > > > > Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan: charming and affable and unwilling > > to > > > back down if she’s right. I can’t see what’s wrong with that. > > > > *Charlotte Allen writes frequently about feminism, politics and > > religion.* > > > Posted by Ted Belman @ 1:56 pm *|* 15 Comments > > > »<http://www.israpundit.com/archives/50788#comments> > > > > Arhata > > > > arhataosho.com > > > > __._,_.___ > > > Reply via web > > > post< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...> > > > Reply > > > to sender <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dRe%3A%20She%E2%80%99s%20hot%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20bl > > > > <http://[email protected]?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20She%E2%80%99s%20hot%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20 > > bl>ue%20collar%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20electable%2E');> > > > Reply > > > to group <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dRe%3A%20She%E2%80%99s%20hot%2C%20she%E2%80%99s% > > 20blue%20collar%2C%20she%E2%80%99s%20electable%2E');> > > > Start > > > a New Topic< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...> > > > Messages > > > in this topic< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/message/99606;_yl.. > > .>(1) > > > Recent Activity: > > > > - New Members< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything/members;_ylc=X3oD...> > > > 1 > > > > Visit Your Group< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lets_Discuss_Anything;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMTRr...> > > > > Have a great peaceful DAY! > > > [image: Yahoo! > > > Groups]< > >http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkOW0ycWg5BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...> > > > Switch to: Text-Only <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional')<http://Le > > > > [email protected]?subject%5Cx3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional')> > > ;>, > > > Daily Digest <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest')<http://Lets_Discuss_An > > [email protected]?subject%5Cx3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest')> > > ;>• > > > Unsubscribe <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dUnsubscribe')<http://Lets_Discuss_Anything-unsu > > [email protected]?subject%5Cx3dUnsubscribe')> > > ;>• > > > Terms > > > of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> • Send us Feedback > > > <javascript:_e({}, > > > 'cvml', > > > ' > > [email protected]?subject\x3dFeedback+on+the+redesigned+individual+mail+v1<h > > > > ttp://[email protected]?subject%5Cx3dFeedback+on+the+redesigned+individual+mail+v1 > > >') > > ;> > > > . > > > > __,_._,___ > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
