close enough. On Feb 27, 4:49 pm, Brian Bednarek <[email protected]> wrote: > How about this ... make all unions that the Gov't acknowledges, civil > unions with all the same rights, not something like 60% and then if some > flying spaghetti monster wants to bless your union, call in marriage ... > but it's not a legal thing, only a religious thing ... not recognized by > the state!!! > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:42 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@ges > > > > > > > > > > mail.com <[email protected]>> wrote: > > Changing the "definition" of the word marriage to include > > homosexuals is an absolute INSULT to most heterosexuals. > > --- > > hogwash ... it's only an insult to religious myth believers who > > persecute homosexuals. > > > their days of morality policing is over. > > > On Feb 26, 8:26 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > MJ: As I've explained several times, the primary issue shouldn't be > > > whether or not gays have a right to form contractual, significant- > > > other relationships, and have the same benefits as a heterosexual > > > spouse. It should only be about prohibition of the use of the WORD > > > married. Changing the "definition" of the word marriage to include > > > homosexuals is an absolute INSULT to most heterosexuals. My "NC" > > > requires that 'pair bonded gays' say that they are "gayged" rather > > > than married. And requires that they use the word "gaygement" rather > > > than marriage. Other than for that, no "do-gooders" in the USA have a > > > right to tell anyone how they choose to live their personal lives; and > > > any 'law' saying otherwise is UNCONSTITUTIONAL social engineering! — > > > John A. Armistead, author of the 'New Constitution of the United > > > States of America'—the updated, strengthened, clarified, and expanded > > > Big Brother of the original Constitution. > > > > On Feb 25, 12:49 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What about the OBVIOUS AIVS1C1? > > > > Regard$, > > > > --MJ > > > > "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this > > much is certain -- that it has either authorized such a government as we > > have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit > > to exist." --L. SpoonerAt 12:20 PM 2/25/2013, you wrote:Obama > > Administration Urges Supreme Court To Strike Down DOMA > > > > By Sakib Ahmed on February 25th, 2013 (1 hour ago) > > > > The Obama administration seems to be serious with this whole, new- > > > > found support of gay marriage. > > > > On Friday, the administration filed a legal brief with the Justice > > > > Department that urges the Supreme Court to strike down a key part of > > > > the Defense of Marriage Act. The brief formally asks the court to > > > > declare Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional—the part that bars > > > > recognition of same-sex marriages for purposes of federal benefits > > > > such as income taxes or federal employee benefits. The brief points > > > > out that there are more than 1,000 federal statues and programs that > > > > come into play depending on a person’s marital status. > > > > The Obama administration notes that some of these couples are legally > > > > married so targeting them is “a harsh form of discrimination that > > > > bears no relation to their ability to contribute to society.” > > > > Moreover, the brief states it violates the constitutional guarantee of > > > > equal protection. > > > -- > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "PoliticalForum" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > brinehttp://brineb.blogspot.com/
-- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
