Thursday, March 7, 2013
The Neocon Points That Rand Adhered To
By, Chris Rossini
Earlier today, Bob Wenzel asked the following:
- And make no mistake, if neocon Jennifer Rubin and the rest of the
crowd were cheering on the filibuster, via tweets during
the
first hour of the speakathon, that calls were made in advance that
Rand could be trusted.
- Otherwise, how could Rubin be so cocksure early on in the filibuster that Rand wouldn't say something objectionable to neocons in, say, hour five? Rand came through, nuff said.
- Otherwise, how could Rubin be so cocksure early on in the filibuster that Rand wouldn't say something objectionable to neocons in, say, hour five? Rand came through, nuff said.
- Paul was clever to pick an issue, a specific and narrow issue, on which virtually no one can disagree. He wasn’t attacking the war on terror. He wasn’t attacking drone use overseas. He surely wasn’t attacking indefinite detention at Guantanamo for enemy combatants. He was objecting to the refusal of the administration to say whether it is constitutional to use drones on U.S. soil against U.S. citizens who are not combatants.
And Rand was able to get onto the Lincoln adorning Glenn Beck show as well as Rush Limbaugh.
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/the-neocon-points-that-rand-adhered-to.html --
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
