"Hair Wafted"? That ain't gonna happen here! <Grin>! No, I surmise that your irritable bowel syndrome is kicking in.....Have some Maalox!
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:28 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hair wafted yet again, Keith? > > Regard$, > --MJ > > "Yesterday, Sen. Rand Paul said, "“I rise today to begin to filibuster > John Brennan’s nomination for the CIA. I will speak until I can no longer > speak. I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from > coast to coast that our Constitution is important….” He thus launched a > filibuster against Pres. Obama's nominee for CIA director. In doing so, > Sen. Paul proved Dick Cheney's prediction right: Rand Paul is not Dick > Cheney's kind of Republican senator." -- Kevin Gutzman 07 Mar 13 > > > > At 11:22 AM 3/8/2013, you wrote: > > Yep, I'm sure it pisses folks like Chris Rossini off to no end, to see > Americans like Rand Paul take a stand that most Americans agree > with.....Like I said, with the exception of Chris Rossini, John McCain and > Lindsey Graham. > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:57 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thursday, March 7, 2013 > The Neocon Points That Rand Adhered To > By, Chris Rossini > > Earlier today, Bob Wenzel > asked<http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/did-planners-of-rand-pauls-filibuster.html>the > following: And > make no mistake, if neocon Jennifer Rubin and the rest of the crowd were > cheering on the filibuster, via tweets during the first hour > <https://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/309357406117326848>of the > speakathon, that calls were made in advance that Rand could be trusted. > Otherwise, > how could Rubin be so cocksure early on in the filibuster that Rand > wouldn't say something objectionable to neocons in, say, hour five? Rand > came through, nuff said. > > Later today Rubin gave us the > checklist<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/03/07/what-the-media-and-the-hawks-missed/>that > garnered her approval (my emphasis): Paul > was clever to pick an issue, a specific and narrow issue, on which > virtually no one can disagree. He wasn’t attacking the war on terror. He > wasn’t attacking drone use overseas. He surely wasn’t attacking indefinite > detention at Guantanamo for enemy combatants. He was objecting to the > refusal of the administration to say whether it is constitutional to use > drones on U.S. soil against U.S. citizens who are not combatants. Bob was > on the money. > > And Rand was able to get onto the Lincoln adorning Glenn Beck show as well > as Rush Limbaugh. > > > http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/03/the-neocon-points-that-rand-adhered-to.html > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
