Free Enterprise was destroyed in America long
ago. Obama has merely picked up where GWB left
off ... who picked up where WJC left off ... who picked up ...
As Jeffrey Tucker so aptly observed,
Every aspect of our lives is subjected to
[government planning] from birth to death. Every
product we buy, every service we use, every
decision we make is filtered through this morass.
You can try this on your own by going to
gpoaccess.gov and typing in anything from chicken
stock to funerals, and observe the state at work,
managing the whole of life as we know it in the
most minute detail one can imagine. Think of
anything and search it, and then see if you think we enjoy "free enterprise".
Obama's disregard of Constitutional limitations
is not new either. AGAIN, he has merely continued
from the examples and usurpations of each of his predecessors.
Bribery has been the standard modus operandi of
the DC swamp since AT LEAST the implementation of
the Fed and the immoral income tax ... hell,
Lincoln started a War over his NEED to 'pay off' those who put him in office.
As I noted, the Constitution is SPECIFIC in regards to treason:
Treason against the United States shall consist
only in levying War against them, or in adhering
to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No
Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on
the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt
Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Should he be impeached? Certainly. The problem is
his so-called 'opposition' cannot wait until THEY
get to use what Obama has usurped ... and build upon his efforts.
Regard$,
--MJ
"It is easy to prescribe improvement for others;
it is easy to organize something, to
institutionalize this or that, to pass laws,
multiply bureaucratic agencies, form pressure
groups, start revolutions, change forms of
government, tinker at political theory. The fact
that these expedients have been tried
unsuccessfully in every conceivable combination
for 6,000 years has not noticeably impaired a
credulous unintelligent willingness to keep on trying them again and again."
-- Albert Jay Nock
At 04:10 PM 3/12/2013, you wrote:
Dear MJ: You are smarter than this! Obama's destroying of our free
enterprise capitalist system—that the Founding Fathers wanted; his
disregard for the Constitutions limits on the scope of government; his
assuming 'dictatorial' powers (with his Czars, executive orders, and
court challenges to fair practices); his wrongly supposing that he was
"elected" by those he BRIBED with "gifts, stuff and entitlements"; and
his refusal to consider his constantly increasing taxes and
expenditures as a threat to the social and economic survival of the
USA are ALL TREASON! Inflation under Obama has STOLEN at least $8,000
per family in the USA during Obama's ILLEGAL first term in office.
For that THEFT alone, he must be hanged-by-the-neck-until-dead! —
John A. Armistead — Author of the "NC" and the top patriot in the USA!
On Mar 11, 1:20 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> Treason -- in the US -- is defined within the
> Constitution. Specifically, AIIIS3C1:
> Treason against the United States shall consist
> only in levying War against them, or in adhering
> to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No
> Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on
> the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt
> Act, or on Confession in open Court.
> The Tyrant Lincoln, for instance EPITOMIZES this definition.
>
> As has been pointed out numerous times, the US
> Constitution is an agreement between Sovereign
> States. The Senate half of the Legislature was to
> represent the States (Am 17 violates Article V).
> The Constitution itself is CHANGED by the
> Sovereign States' (legislature) consent. The
> Executive is CHOSEN by Electors selected in
> whatever manner decided upon by the STATE Legislatures.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> "Media figure Steve Deace says in his latest
> column, "A good example of contractual rights
> would be the U.S. Constitution, which begins with
> the words, 'We the people of the United States in
> order to form a more perfect union.' Immediately
> the parties involved in the contract are
> established: the people, the states, and the
> federal government (or union). From there each
> party states in the contract the terms,
> jurisdictions, and liabilities each are
> responsible for and permitted to perform." He is
> mistaken here in two ways. First, the Federal
> Government is not a party to the Constitution,
> which created the Federal Government, any more
> than an individual can be a party to his own
> conception; second, the people and the states are
> the same, as James Madison explained in his
> "Report of 1800." He there explained that the
> word "states" can have any of three
> significations: it can refer to the territory of
> a state, as in "I am presently in the state of
> Connecticut"; it can refer to the government of a
> state, as in, "The policy of the state of New
> York is that the speed limit on interstate
> highways is 65 m.p.h.; and it can refer to the
> sovereign people of a state, as in, "The state of
> Virginia ratified the Constitution."
>
> "The parties to the Constitution are the states,
> in that third Madisonian sense of the word "state."" -- Kevin Gutzman
>
> At 09:47 PM 3/10/2013, you wrote:>Dear Bruce
M.: NO! Obama should be HANGED for TREASON!!!
> >Impeachment is a practically unworkable and weak process that is one
> >of the three major errors of the Founding Fathers. The other two?
> >Allowing the low population states to BRIBE the Constitutional
> >Convention into having a non-Representative (population proportional)
> >US Senate. And... Allowing Congress to make its own rules without
> >stipulating that all rules must be consistent with Fairness and parity
> >of voting power that is the very SPIRIT of the entire Constitution!
> >By the latter immutable standards there can be no "leaders" of
> >Congress; no greater power to those with seniority; no determination
> >of chairmanships of committees depending on the winning party; and
> >nothing else that "divides the house down the aisle"! Political
> >parties are the antithesis of a FAIR Representative Republic! I
> >should know, because I've penned and polished our 'New Constitution of
> >the United States of America'—an updated, strengthened, clarified and
> >expanded Big Brother of the original weak Constitution, that is, at
> >this moment, the ONLY active document capable of solving every
> >governmental and socioeconomic problem in America! Having a liberated
> >Fair free enterprise Capitalist system should increase the prosperity
> >of most Americans, left and right. And no grannies will be pushed
> >over any cliffs to do it! — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
>
> >On Mar 9, 6:38 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > ------
>
> > >http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/07/why-obama-should-be-impeached/
>
> > > Who Will Step Up to Defend the Constitution?
> > > Why Obama Should be Impeached
> > > by DAVE LINDORFF
>
> > > If the Constitution is to have any
relevance, and if America is to remain a
> > > free society, then there is really no alternative: there must
> > > be a bill of impeachment drawn up and submitted in the House, and there
> > > must at least be a hearing on that bill in the House Judiciary
> > > Committee.
>
> > > The disclosure, by NBC, of a so-called “white paper” by the White
> > > House offering the legal justification for the executing of American
> > > citizens solely on the authority of the executive branch and the
> > > president exposes a White House so blatantly in violation of the
> > > Constitution that it simply demands such a hearing....
> > > Dave Lindorff is a founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a
> > > contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion,
> > > published by AK Press. Hopeless is also
available in a Kindle edition. He
> > > lives in Philadelphia.
> > > --
--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
