Does he "Sing"  in tongues?


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, plainolamerican
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I actually thought that this band jammed!
> ---
> yeah ... a really good band ... but the lead singer is a mental case.
> he was raised in MS by pentecostal parents.
>
> On May 1, 11:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey Plain Ol!
> >
> > Yep, I did like the vid!  I actually thought that this band jammed!
>  Thanks
> > for sharing,  (and thanks for having a sense of humor!)
> >
> > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:07 AM, plainolamerican
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I haven't read Wikipedia,
> > > ---
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_contra
> > > read it ... it will refresh your memory.
> >
> > >  but no doubt I have seen a lot of "wrong"
> > > misinformation contained on Wiki in the past.....
> > > ---
> > > the documentation is listed.
> >
> > > Bless your heart!
> > > ---
> > > Southern for fuck you.
> > > You're going to love this ... watch it all.
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNafujwLWj4
> >
> > > On Apr 30, 8:23 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hey Plain Ol'
> >
> > > > I haven't read Wikipedia, but no doubt I have seen a lot of "wrong"
> > > > misinformation contained on Wiki in the past.....Bless your heart!
> >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:53 PM, plainolamerican
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > Again,  it just didn't happen as you believe, or as some media
> reports
> > > > > now
> > > > > suggest.
> > > > > ---
> > > > > the history of the iran-contra affair is well known.
> > > > > if Wiki was wrong the repubs would have the information changed.
> >
> > > > >   There is empirical data to show what exactly happened, as well as
> > > > > the testimony of Col. North.
> > > > > ---
> > > > > North is a lying pos to ignore. He lied to protect Ronald "I Can't
> > > > > Recall" Reagan.
> >
> > > > > On Apr 30, 2:11 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Again,  it just didn't happen as you believe, or as some media
> > > reports
> > > > > now
> > > > > > suggest.  There is empirical data to show what exactly happened,
> as
> > > well
> > > > > as
> > > > > > the testimony of Col. North.
> >
> > > > > > As far as the Reagan Taxes,  we went through this not even a
> month
> > > ago,
> > > > > > where I presented evidence to show that such allegations are
> total
> > > > > > nonsense, not based on fact; not even logical, an nothing less
> than
> > > far
> > > > > > left extremist spin and revisionist history.
> >
> > > > > > If you want to believe in idiotic theory,  no sweat off of my
> > > > > back......It
> > > > > > just is demonstrative of what we are dealing with in this
> Nation, and
> > > > > proof
> > > > > > positive of the , "Dumbing Down Of America".
> >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, plainolamerican
> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > None of this of course, is even remotely true
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_contra
> > > > > > > fourteen administration officials were indicted, including
> then-
> > > > > > > Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions
> > > resulted,
> > > > > > > some of which were vacated on appeal. The rest of those
> indicted or
> > > > > > > convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the
> presidency of
> > > > > > > George H. W. Bush, who had been vice-president at the time of
> the
> > > > > > > affair.
> >
> > > > > > > On Apr 29, 9:35 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > *"As one might expect, most gloss over or completely avoid
> > > > > mentioning the
> > > > > > > > many embarrassing and outright alarming aspects of his
> > > presidency:
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > consulting astrologers to his fixation with biblical doom to
> the
> > > > > tortured
> > > > > > > > rationalizations that enabled him to believe that he never
> traded
> > > > > arms
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > hostages."*
> >
> > > > > > > > None of this of course, is even remotely true, nor is Green's
> > > > > assertion
> > > > > > > > regarding Reagan raising taxes four times,  or most of
> Green's
> > > > > > >  allegations
> > > > > > > > that besmirch the Reagan legacy.   But what is one to expect
> > > from a
> > > > > > > > fiction writer from "The Onion",  who was only 7 years of age
> > > when
> > > > > > > > President Reagan was elected.:
> >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:41 PM, MJ <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >  *
> > > > > > > > > "When conservatives mythologize the Reagan presidency as
> the
> > > golden
> > > > > > > era of
> > > > > > > > > conservatism, it's not Reagan that they're mythologizing,
> but
> > > > > > > conservatism."
> >
> > > > > > > > > **Reagan's Liberal Legacy
> > > > > > > > > *Joshua Green, Washington Monthly, 35/1, Jan/Feb 2003
> >
> > > > > > > > > OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, Nancy Reagan has quietly been
> > > > > alerting
> > > > > > > > > friends and family that the health of her husband Ronald
> > > Reagan,
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > nation's 40th president, is failing rapidly due to
> Alzheimer's.
> > > > > Reagan
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > turn 92 on Feb. 6, and the signs seem to suggest that he
> won't
> > > be
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > us
> > > > > > > > > for very much longer.
> >
> > > > > > > > > It is not uncommon, when such circumstances involve a
> national
> > > > > figure,
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > the media to prepare tributes and obituaries in
> anticipation
> > > of the
> > > > > > > event.
> > > > > > > > > But in the case of Ronald Reagan, the magnitude of this
> ritual
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > > certain to eclipse anything that has preceded it. As long
> as
> > > five
> > > > > years
> > > > > > > > > ago, the three main newsweeklies had locked up eminent
> > > presidential
> > > > > > > > > historians to write his valedictories. The conservative
> > > Heritage
> > > > > > > Foundation
> > > > > > > > > has underwritten a multimedia Reagan legacy project, cued
> up
> > > and
> > > > > > > awaiting
> > > > > > > > > word of his death. The major networks and the History
> Channel
> > > have
> > > > > > > prepared
> > > > > > > > > exhaustive documentaries (the latter didn't even wait for
> > > Reagan's
> > > > > > > > > departure, airing "Ronald Reagan: A Legacy Remembered" over
> > > > > > > Thanksgiving).
> > > > > > > > > And media jockeying to pay tribute has already begun: This
> > > month's
> > > > > > > Esquire
> > > > > > > > > dubs Reagan the "greatest living American."
> >
> > > > > > > > > But the clearest indicator can be found at the bookstore.
> The
> > > last
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > months have brought an avalanche of Reagan biographies,
> from
> > > John
> > > > > > > Harmer's
> > > > > > > > > Reagan: Man of Principle to Peter Schweizer's Reagan's War
> to
> > > Peter
> > > > > > > > > Wallison's Ronald Reagan: The Power of Conviction and the
> > > Success
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > His
> > > > > > > > > Presidency. They join such recent fare as William E Buckley
> > > Jr.'s
> > > > > > > Ronald
> > > > > > > > > Reagan: An American Hero, Peggy Noonan's When Character Was
> > > King,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > Dinesh D'Souza's Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became
> an
> > > > > > > Extraordinary
> > > > > > > > > Leader, themselves just a fraction of the 427 listings on
> > > > > Amazon.com,
> > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > > > of them gauzy tributes, each striving to bestow an encomium
> > > more
> > > > > noble
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > gallant than the last. Indeed, what is so striking about
> these
> > > > > > > > > books--besides their sheer number--is their collective
> > > > > determination to
> > > > > > > > > exalt Reagan as the heroic embodiment of American
> conservatism.
> >
> > > > > > > > > This is no accident. In fact, there is an active campaign
> to
> > > nail
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > place a canonical version of Reagan's life and career.
> > > Energetic
> > > > > > > > > conservatives have organized a drive to glorify the former
> > > > > president by
> > > > > > > > > trying to do everything from affixing his name to public
> > > buildings
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > of the nation's 3,066 counties to substituting his face for
> > > > > Alexander
> > > > > > > > > Hamilton's on the $10 bill. A similar dynamic applies here.
> > > Many of
> > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > hagiographies are written by noted conservative authors
> > > (Buckley,
> > > > > > > Noonan,
> > > > > > > > > D'Souza) or former Reagan staffers (Wallison, Martin
> Anderson,
> > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > Deaver), under the auspices of conservative think tanks
> such
> > > as the
> > > > > > > > > American Enterprise Institute (Wallison), the Hoover
> > > Institution
> > > > > > > (Anderson
> > > > > > > > > and Schweizer), and the Heritage Foundation (Stephen E
> > > Hayward's
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > Age of
> > > > > > > > > Reagan, the first of two volumes).
> >
> > > > > > > > > One would have to go back to FDR to find a comparable
> example
> > > of a
> > > > > > > > > president portrayed in such consistently glowing
> terms--and the
> > > > > > > > > swashbuckling triumphs depicted in these books mythologize
> > > Reagan
> > > > > to a
> > > > > > > > > degree which exceeds even that. As one might expect, most
> gloss
> > > > > over or
> > > > > > > > > completely avoid mentioning the many embarrassing and
> outright
> > > > > alarming
> > > > > > > > > aspects of his presidency: from consulting astrologers to
> his
> > > > > fixation
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > biblical doom to the tortured rationalizations that enabled
> > > him to
> > > > > > > believe
> > > > > > > > > that he never traded arms for hostages. But they also do
> > > something
> > > > > > > else.
> > > > > > > > > Most of his conservative biographers espouse a Manichaean
> > > > > worldview in
> > > > > > > > > which Reagan's constancy in the face of liberal evils is
> the
> > > key
> > > > > to his
> > > > > > > > > greatness. But to sustain such an argument requires more
> than
> > > > > simply
> > > > > > > > > touting (and often exaggerating) his achievements,
> considerable
> > > > > though
> > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > of them were. The effort to gild Reagan's legacy also
> seems to
> > > > > demand
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > any accomplishment that didn't explicitly advance
> conservative
> > > > > goals be
> > > > > > > > > expunged from his record. And so they have been.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Reagan is, to be sure, one of the most conservative
> presidents
> > > in
> > > > > U.S.
> > > > > > > > > history and will certainly be remembered as such. His
> record
> > > on the
> > > > > > > > > environment, defense, and economic policy is very much in
> line
> > > > > with its
> > > > > > > > > portrayal. But he entered office as an ideologue
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more ยป
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to