no ... but he does know how to piss the preacher off. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTopBVsai_4
On May 2, 1:22 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Does he "Sing" in tongues? > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, plainolamerican > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > I actually thought that this band jammed! > > --- > > yeah ... a really good band ... but the lead singer is a mental case. > > he was raised in MS by pentecostal parents. > > > On May 1, 11:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey Plain Ol! > > > > Yep, I did like the vid! I actually thought that this band jammed! > > Thanks > > > for sharing, (and thanks for having a sense of humor!) > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:07 AM, plainolamerican > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > I haven't read Wikipedia, > > > > --- > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_contra > > > > read it ... it will refresh your memory. > > > > > but no doubt I have seen a lot of "wrong" > > > > misinformation contained on Wiki in the past..... > > > > --- > > > > the documentation is listed. > > > > > Bless your heart! > > > > --- > > > > Southern for fuck you. > > > > You're going to love this ... watch it all. > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNafujwLWj4 > > > > > On Apr 30, 8:23 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Plain Ol' > > > > > > I haven't read Wikipedia, but no doubt I have seen a lot of "wrong" > > > > > misinformation contained on Wiki in the past.....Bless your heart! > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:53 PM, plainolamerican > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Again, it just didn't happen as you believe, or as some media > > reports > > > > > > now > > > > > > suggest. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > the history of the iran-contra affair is well known. > > > > > > if Wiki was wrong the repubs would have the information changed. > > > > > > > There is empirical data to show what exactly happened, as well as > > > > > > the testimony of Col. North. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > North is a lying pos to ignore. He lied to protect Ronald "I Can't > > > > > > Recall" Reagan. > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 2:11 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Again, it just didn't happen as you believe, or as some media > > > > reports > > > > > > now > > > > > > > suggest. There is empirical data to show what exactly happened, > > as > > > > well > > > > > > as > > > > > > > the testimony of Col. North. > > > > > > > > As far as the Reagan Taxes, we went through this not even a > > month > > > > ago, > > > > > > > where I presented evidence to show that such allegations are > > total > > > > > > > nonsense, not based on fact; not even logical, an nothing less > > than > > > > far > > > > > > > left extremist spin and revisionist history. > > > > > > > > If you want to believe in idiotic theory, no sweat off of my > > > > > > back......It > > > > > > > just is demonstrative of what we are dealing with in this > > Nation, and > > > > > > proof > > > > > > > positive of the , "Dumbing Down Of America". > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, plainolamerican > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > None of this of course, is even remotely true > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_contra > > > > > > > > fourteen administration officials were indicted, including > > then- > > > > > > > > Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions > > > > resulted, > > > > > > > > some of which were vacated on appeal. The rest of those > > indicted or > > > > > > > > convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the > > presidency of > > > > > > > > George H. W. Bush, who had been vice-president at the time of > > the > > > > > > > > affair. > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 9:35 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > *"As one might expect, most gloss over or completely avoid > > > > > > mentioning the > > > > > > > > > many embarrassing and outright alarming aspects of his > > > > presidency: > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > consulting astrologers to his fixation with biblical doom to > > the > > > > > > tortured > > > > > > > > > rationalizations that enabled him to believe that he never > > traded > > > > > > arms > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > hostages."* > > > > > > > > > > None of this of course, is even remotely true, nor is Green's > > > > > > assertion > > > > > > > > > regarding Reagan raising taxes four times, or most of > > Green's > > > > > > > > allegations > > > > > > > > > that besmirch the Reagan legacy. But what is one to expect > > > > from a > > > > > > > > > fiction writer from "The Onion", who was only 7 years of age > > > > when > > > > > > > > > President Reagan was elected.: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:41 PM, MJ <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > "When conservatives mythologize the Reagan presidency as > > the > > > > golden > > > > > > > > era of > > > > > > > > > > conservatism, it's not Reagan that they're mythologizing, > > but > > > > > > > > conservatism." > > > > > > > > > > > **Reagan's Liberal Legacy > > > > > > > > > > *Joshua Green, Washington Monthly, 35/1, Jan/Feb 2003 > > > > > > > > > > > OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, Nancy Reagan has quietly been > > > > > > alerting > > > > > > > > > > friends and family that the health of her husband Ronald > > > > Reagan, > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > nation's 40th president, is failing rapidly due to > > Alzheimer's. > > > > > > Reagan > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > turn 92 on Feb. 6, and the signs seem to suggest that he > > won't > > > > be > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > for very much longer. > > > > > > > > > > > It is not uncommon, when such circumstances involve a > > national > > > > > > figure, > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > the media to prepare tributes and obituaries in > > anticipation > > > > of the > > > > > > > > event. > > > > > > > > > > But in the case of Ronald Reagan, the magnitude of this > > ritual > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > > > > certain to eclipse anything that has preceded it. As long > > as > > > > five > > > > > > years > > > > > > > > > > ago, the three main newsweeklies had locked up eminent > > > > presidential > > > > > > > > > > historians to write his valedictories. The conservative > > > > Heritage > > > > > > > > Foundation > > > > > > > > > > has underwritten a multimedia Reagan legacy project, cued > > up > > > > and > > > > > > > > awaiting > > > > > > > > > > word of his death. The major networks and the History > > Channel > > > > have > > > > > > > > prepared > > > > > > > > > > exhaustive documentaries (the latter didn't even wait for > > > > Reagan's > > > > > > > > > > departure, airing "Ronald Reagan: A Legacy Remembered" over > > > > > > > > Thanksgiving). > > > > > > > > > > And media jockeying to pay tribute has already begun: This > > > > month's > > > > > > > > Esquire > > > > > > > > > > dubs Reagan the "greatest living American." > > > > > > > > > > > But the clearest indicator can be found at the bookstore. > > The > > > > last > > > > > > few > > > > > > > > > > months have brought an avalanche of Reagan biographies, > > from > > > > John > > > > > > > > Harmer's > > > > > > > > > > Reagan: Man of Principle to Peter Schweizer's Reagan's War > > to > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > Wallison's Ronald Reagan: The Power of Conviction and the > > > > Success > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > His > > > > > > > > > > Presidency. They join such recent fare as William E Buckley > > > > Jr.'s > > > > > > > > Ronald > > > > > > > > > > Reagan: An American Hero, Peggy Noonan's When Character Was > > > > King, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > Dinesh D'Souza's Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became > > an > > > > > > > > Extraordinary > > > > > > > > > > Leader, themselves just a fraction of the 427 listings on > > > > > > Amazon.com, > > > > > > > > many > > > > > > > > > > of them gauzy tributes, each striving to bestow an encomium > > > > more > > > > > > noble > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > gallant than the last. Indeed, what is so striking about > > these > > > > > > > > > > books--besides their sheer number--is their collective > > > > > > determination to > > > > > > > > > > exalt Reagan as the heroic embodiment of American > > conservatism. > > > > > > > > > > > This is no accident. In fact, there is an active campaign > > to > > > > nail > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > place a canonical version of Reagan's life and career. > > > > Energetic > > > > > > > > > > conservatives have organized a drive to glorify the former > > > > > > president by > > > > > > > > > > trying to do everything from affixing his name to public > > > > buildings > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > of the nation's 3,066 counties to substituting his face for > > > > > > Alexander > > > > > > > > > > Hamilton's on the $10 bill. A similar dynamic applies here. > > > > Many of > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > hagiographies are written by noted conservative authors > > > > (Buckley, > > > > > > > > Noonan, > > > > > > > > > > D'Souza) or former Reagan staffers (Wallison, Martin > > Anderson, > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > Deaver), under the auspices of conservative think tanks > > such > > > > as the > > > > > > > > > > American Enterprise Institute (Wallison), the Hoover > > > > Institution > > > > > > > > (Anderson > > > > > > > > > > and Schweizer), and the Heritage Foundation (Stephen E > > > > Hayward's > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > Age of > > > > > > > > > > Reagan, the first of two volumes). > > > > > > > > > > > One would have to go back to FDR to find a comparable > > example > > > > of a > > > > > > > > > > president portrayed in such consistently glowing > > terms--and the > > > > > > > > > > swashbuckling triumphs depicted in these books mythologize > > > > Reagan > > > > > > to a > > > > > > > > > > degree which exceeds even that. As one might expect, most > > gloss > > > > > > over or > > > > > > > > > > completely avoid mentioning the many embarrassing and > > ... > > read more » -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
