nobody is asking the state to change the definition of marriage. what's in question is equal rights for gays. persecuting someone because of sexual preference seems quite archaic and that's exactly what jewish/christian/muzzy religious doctrine promotes.
On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a > Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against > modifying the definition of Marriage. > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal... > > > -- > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "PoliticalForum" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
